Militia group with active military members commit murder

JKing106

Platinum Member
Mar 19, 2009
2,193
0
0
Seems a new formed militia group named F.E.A.R. (Forever Enduring Always Ready) with active military members decided to murder a former member, and his girlfriend, to protect their plans. The founder used the $500,000 insurance he collected after the death of his wife to buy $87,000 worth of weapons and material for making bombs, and bought land outside of Kent... I mean, Washington state to start his little "family." He also had other plans:

"The prosecutor said the militia group had big plans. It plotted to take over Fort Stewart by seizing its ammunition control point and talked of bombing the Forsyth Park fountain in nearby Savannah, she said. In Washington state, she added, the group plotted to bomb a dam and poison the state's apple crop. Ultimately, prosecutors said, the militia's goal was to overthrow the government and assassinate the president."

Guess Aguigui read "The Turner Diaries" too much instead of using it to wipe his ass, like any sane and moral person would. Guess he's going to be spending a lot of time with "thugs." His perfect white society fantasy just went up in smoke.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/08/27/military-terror-plot-murd_n_1833435.html
 

spidey07

No Lifer
Aug 4, 2000
65,469
5
76
Occupiers? Sounds like their MO and would be in line with the other OWS domestic terrorists arrested this year.
 

JKing106

Platinum Member
Mar 19, 2009
2,193
0
0
Occupiers? Sounds like their MO and would be in line with the other OWS domestic terrorists arrested this year.

Sounds like a group you'd be a member of. What do your friends on Stormfront.org think about it?
 

Jaskalas

Lifer
Jun 23, 2004
35,455
9,677
136
You want to take a stand, convince a state to secede and then protect their government from the inevitable confrontation. You don't go around plotting a suicidal stand at a military base, and you most certainly do not think of harming our food supply.

Good riddance, props to those who protected us.
 

spidey07

No Lifer
Aug 4, 2000
65,469
5
76
They're anarchists. It's well known that OWS is full of them. Hell they stand "side by side in solidarity", so it's no surprise they would be associated with OWS and occupiers.
 

trenchfoot

Lifer
Aug 5, 2000
15,642
8,184
136
I recall viewing a special on Discovery(?) about gang members joining the military to gain experience in tactical manuevers and weapons training.

The problem being hard pressed overzealous recruiters looking to fill quotas and insufficient security clearance procedures.
 

IronWing

No Lifer
Jul 20, 2001
72,365
32,935
136
They're anarchists. It's well known that OWS is full of them. Hell they stand "side by side in solidarity", so it's no surprise they would be associated with OWS and occupiers.


They were wearing hats. The pope wears a hat! This is an obvious catholic plot to overthrow our republic!!!

Spidey, time to put away the oxycodone.
 

JKing106

Platinum Member
Mar 19, 2009
2,193
0
0
They're anarchists. It's well known that OWS is full of them. Hell they stand "side by side in solidarity", so it's no surprise they would be associated with OWS and occupiers.

They're white supremacists. It's well know you're one, so it's no surprise you are trying to deflect their ideology to something idiotic you heard from Rush Limbaugh. You're really quite transparent, Spidey. I knew this post would bring you faster than a fly after shit.
 

Nintendesert

Diamond Member
Mar 28, 2010
7,761
5
0
I recall viewing a special on Discovery(?) about gang members joining the military to gain experience in tactical manuevers and weapons training.

The problem being hard pressed overzealous recruiters looking to fill quotas and insufficient security clearance procedures.



What security clearance procedures? A vast majority of the military doesn't have any sort of a clearance. :confused:

And I don't know if you've noticed but with such a shitty economy recruiters haven't had any difficulty finding people to join the military. The gangs learning tactical training from the military is overblown.
 
Jan 25, 2011
17,017
9,460
146
They're anarchists. It's well known that OWS is full of them. Hell they stand "side by side in solidarity", so it's no surprise they would be associated with OWS and occupiers.

Since the leader of this group is also believed to have been a page at the 2008 RNC Convention, I'm going to guess no on it being OWS people.
 
Last edited:

cybrsage

Lifer
Nov 17, 2011
13,021
0
0
They're white supremacists.

Please quote the portion of the article which says this. I looked and did not find it, so it appears your racist tendancies invented it. Everything I have read says "anarchist" not "white surpremist".

I could be wrong, please quote this part of your article.
 

JKing106

Platinum Member
Mar 19, 2009
2,193
0
0
Please quote the portion of the article which says this. I looked and did not find it, so it appears your racist tendancies invented it. Everything I have read says "anarchist" not "white surpremist".

I could be wrong, please quote this part of your article.

It's called logic. It's called deductive reasoning. It's called using your fucking head, something you don't know anything about. You're used to being told what to do, say and think, so it's not surprising if it's not literally in black and white print, you're completely lost and clueless. Tell me, how many members of this fledgling militia weren't white? Now, which member of the Executive branch of our government isn't white, the person they planned to assassinate?
 

cybrsage

Lifer
Nov 17, 2011
13,021
0
0
It's called logic.

Ah, that explains why you failed then. You made it up because you are a racist and live to try and make everything race based. You failed miserably this time.

Apparently, you have never heard of Black Anarchism

You no longer can claim you do not know that anarchy is a white thing and therefor everyone who does it must be a white supremist. You also need to stop pretending that anarchists wanting to kill national leaders means they are racists...that is part and parcel of what it means to be an anarchist - the destruction of the government.
 

JKing106

Platinum Member
Mar 19, 2009
2,193
0
0
Ah, that explains why you failed then. You made it up because you are a racist and live to try and make everything race based. You failed miserably this time.

Apparently, you have never heard of Black Anarchism

You no longer can claim you do not know that anarchy is a white thing and therefor everyone who does it must be a white supremist. You also need to stop pretending that anarchists wanting to kill national leaders means they are racists...that is part and parcel of what it means to be an anarchist - the destruction of the government.

Right. You're defending your own racism by pointing out black racists. That makes everything ok. Just like it did on the playground. He did it, so I can, too. You're a fucking moron, and a hypocrite. You're right at home on this forum.
 

cybrsage

Lifer
Nov 17, 2011
13,021
0
0
:D You really think EVERYTHING is a race based issue! Wow. Even when presented with proof you are wrong, you instead decide that being proven wrong means you are right!

You are desperately close to taking the Forum Jester role from Cerpin.
 
Apr 27, 2012
10,086
58
86
Where did it say that they were white supremacists? As well there are lots of people that want to kill obama after all the damage he has done to them,not that its justified though
 

JKing106

Platinum Member
Mar 19, 2009
2,193
0
0
These douchebags don’t fit the mold of either White Supremacy or Occupy.

Sure they do. Well, not Occupy. Angry white males with guns, can't stand the thought of a black man in the White House, ruining our country, handing out all that welfare to his "kids," all them food stamps, running them Planned Parenthood places that churn out black babies and kill white babies. Hell, the only reason he got the job is affirmative action, right? Makes perfect sense.'
 

cybrsage

Lifer
Nov 17, 2011
13,021
0
0
Who has he done damage to?

map-of-the-united-states-with-states-labeled_1.jpg
 

thraashman

Lifer
Apr 10, 2000
11,112
1,587
126

He asked who Obama damaged, not who was saved from a massive depression by Obama's policies after years of horrible policies by the GOP. And not who now has access to healthcare because of Obama.

Really, up until this I would've said you were making a more intelligent argument than JKing. Now you're even.