Nebor
Lifer
- Jun 24, 2003
- 29,582
- 12
- 76
Why would trans members be subject to the same limitations as diabetic members? Can you provide any medical evidence to back this up?
Isn't gender identity disorder primarily caused by insulin imbalance?
Why would trans members be subject to the same limitations as diabetic members? Can you provide any medical evidence to back this up?
defense of the nation? Dont you mean attack of other nations?
Good Lord. I am so glad I retired from this circus they are running from Washington DC they are trying to pass off as a Military.
Women on Submarines, Transgenders everywhere ... what is next? It scares me.
Women on Submarines, Transgenders everywhere ... what is next? It scares me.
Well said, and thank you for your service.Absolutely terrible idea. I am currently in Quantico,VA. Headquarters of the Marine Corps in a class with 95 (had 97 dropped two to being fatties) other Marines. We break out into open discussions sometimes about this or that. A woman who "identifies" (stupid term) as a man and tried to be a Marine would not go over well based from personal experience. Especially based on which MOS he/she went to. Fact is females can't do everything physically men can do.
edit, and to claim that Ortega deployed with no problems on deployments, is because Ortega was on a big base. As an helicopter crew chief they don't go down range. Ortega was not without a good chow hall, gym, place to actually sleep. Which all effect working out. Washington post calling them "combat deployments" is misleading. Sure it can technically be in a combat zone, but no where near combat. Touchy subject for me.
Just like it's funny to watch you pretend that transitioning from one sex to another is simple and inexpensive.It's funny to watch you fail when simply asked to support your position. Instead you made up some military fanfic.
If you guys want to argue that supporting trans troops in the field is infeasible how about providing a single, solitary piece of evidence other than your own opinion?
Oh wait, that's a lot more work than whining about how someone told you that you should have spent a second looking up if testosterone needed to be refrigerated.
Thanks.:sneaky:
And I agree with everything you've posted on this one.
Problem is a lot of Americans don't want the most bang for our buck. They want social justice, and if that weakens our military, even better.Either way, you want the most bang for your buck. You're not getting that with the transgender F35 program.
Problem is a lot of Americans don't want the most bang for our buck. They want social justice, and if that weakens our military, even better.
Still waiting for a big SJW push to require women to sign up for the draft.
lol So a line in a policy platform designed to push the ERA is a "big SJW push to require women to sign up for the draft"? Don't think so.You mean like this? It's not your scary little 'SJWs' though.
http://usnews.nbcnews.com/_news/201...ter-with-selective-service-gaining-steam?lite
Or, going back to 1980 and NOW, they oppose the draft for everyone but believe that if there is one, it should be for both men and women.
"1980 NOW announces opposition to the draft, but states that if there is a draft, NOW supports the inclusion of women on the same basis as men."
http://now.org/about/history/highlights/
You mean like this? It's not your scary little 'SJWs' though.
http://usnews.nbcnews.com/_news/201...ter-with-selective-service-gaining-steam?lite
Or, going back to 1980 and NOW, they oppose the draft for everyone but believe that if there is one, it should be for both men and women.
"1980 NOW announces opposition to the draft, but states that if there is a draft, NOW supports the inclusion of women on the same basis as men."
http://now.org/about/history/highlights/
Maybe people in the military realized there's no valid military reason to keep excluding these people so how about we stop kicking them out.
^ LMAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Looks like we'll have comic relief for a few days until tuggy get's underway again.
Usual hateful rhetoric for our favorite homophobic idiot.
Debate me.
How is wanting to have an arm or leg cut off mentally ill, but cutting a penis off is not?
Should the military allow people with a mental illness to serve?
This may save our female soldiers from being raped. Say you're an average Islamic thug fighting for the Allah-given right to keep women as property and you capture an American female soldier. You would like to rape her. Mohammad says it's fine for you to rape her. Allah approves. However, now you cannot be sure she does not have a penis, in which case Allah will change his mind and insist you cut off your own head. And no virgins!
No, go fuck a chicken. You're not worth the time I've already spent typing this response.
With young boys, yes. And with sheep or goats, as long as you don't eat the meat. Not with grown men. Although I'll admit I'm not sure where grown men with breasts fall on the Islamic scale of damnation.Because pre-marital sex carries such a harsh penalty in Islam (particularly for women,) heterosexual premarital sex is actually fairly uncommon. Instead, homosexual premarital sex, often with young boys, is fairly common throughout the Middle East and southwest Asia. This habit tends to carry on into married life for a small percentage of men.
Would you let someone who thinks he is a dog serve in the military? Let him/her dress in a dog suit and go around barking at people?
Or would you tell that person they are not a dog and go get some help?
^ LMAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Looks like we'll have comic relief for a few days until tuggy get's underway again.
Would you let someone who thinks he is a dog serve in the military? Let him/her dress in a dog suit and go around barking at people?
Or would you tell that person they are not a dog and go get some help?
yet when a man or woman thinks they are the opposite sex we are supposed to accept it?
