Militarization of the US police force

schneiderguy

Lifer
Jun 26, 2006
10,801
91
91
http://www.alternet.org/world/15152...arization_of_the_us_police_force/?page=entire

I find this disturbing. Police should be well armed, but not that well armed. AR-15's? Sure, against a bad guy with body armor something better than their handgun or a shotgun comes in handy. Grenade launchers and armored tanks? WTF do they need those for?

IMO "regular" civilians should have access to any weaponry that the police use. If they need automatic weapons and grenade launchers and armored tanks for defense against criminals, we do too.
 

Doppel

Lifer
Feb 5, 2011
13,306
3
0
IMO "regular" civilians should have access to any weaponry that the police use. If they need automatic weapons and grenade launchers and armored tanks for defense against criminals, we do too.
What about access to what military uses?
 
May 16, 2000
13,522
0
0
http://www.alternet.org/world/15152...arization_of_the_us_police_force/?page=entire

I find this disturbing. Police should be well armed, but not that well armed. AR-15's? Sure, against a bad guy with body armor something better than their handgun or a shotgun comes in handy. Grenade launchers and armored tanks? WTF do they need those for?

IMO "regular" civilians should have access to any weaponry that the police use. If they need automatic weapons and grenade launchers and armored tanks for defense against criminals, we do too.

We do have access to those things, just with one more step. We use our 2nd amendment rights to raid the police storage for the bigger weapons when necessary. Then we use the police weapons to raid military storage for the stage after that. You don't have to walk around with a howitzer in tow...just need to know where to get one, and carry a pistol to trade up along the way.
 

Howard

Lifer
Oct 14, 1999
47,982
11
81
We do have access to those things, just with one more step. We use our 2nd amendment rights to raid the police storage for the bigger weapons when necessary. Then we use the police weapons to raid military storage for the stage after that. You don't have to walk around with a howitzer in tow...just need to know where to get one, and carry a pistol to trade up along the way.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e5Iey0wDqBE
 

Darwin333

Lifer
Dec 11, 2006
19,946
2,330
126
What about access to what military uses?

The military is forbiden by law to fight against the citizens of the United States except in very special circumstances.

The "Police" are considered civilian law enforcement. Pretty big difference between the two, or do you think your local police department needs and should bring to use a stealth bomber or two?
 

schneiderguy

Lifer
Jun 26, 2006
10,801
91
91
What about access to what military uses?

I see no reason why a private citizen shouldn't be able to own artillery or fighter jets or an aircraft carrier along with their respective munitions if they aren't a violent felon.
 

PeshakJang

Platinum Member
Mar 17, 2010
2,276
0
0
Somebody needs to stop all those radical war vet terrorists who didn't vote for Obama.
 

1prophet

Diamond Member
Aug 17, 2005
5,313
534
126

Anarchist420

Diamond Member
Feb 13, 2010
8,645
0
76
www.facebook.com
I see no reason why a private citizen shouldn't be able to own artillery or fighter jets or an aircraft carrier along with their respective munitions if they aren't a violent felon.
No one should be prohibited by the Federal govt from owning anything, regardless if they're a criminal.

I think it's ridiculous that the state is more armed than the citizens. The most the Federal government should be allowed to do during peacetime in terms of militarism is to guard common armories on U.S. soil only. The Federal govt also should not be allowed to own more than 10% of the land in the Republic during peacetime. And, the military should not be allowed off U.S. soil.
 

Ackmed

Diamond Member
Oct 1, 2003
8,499
560
126
IMO "regular" civilians should have access to any weaponry that the police use. If they need automatic weapons and grenade launchers and armored tanks for defense against criminals, we do too.

This is an idiotic statement. Civilians should not be brandishing street justice. It's the Police Offices job to protect the citizens. Not the citizens job to protect themselves out in the street. In their home? Sure. A lot of perps are using some sort of Kevlar vest now days, with the same, or higher powered guns that Police use.

FYI, not all AR-15's are automatic. In fact, I know for a fact our Police Officer's are not. Also, a 40mm is used commonly for smoke and gas, not explosives.

Get some facts, get some common sense, and shut up.
 
May 16, 2000
13,522
0
0
This is an idiotic statement. Civilians should not be brandishing street justice. It's the Police Offices job to protect the citizens. Not the citizens job to protect themselves out in the street. In their home? Sure. A lot of perps are using some sort of Kevlar vest now days, with the same, or higher powered guns that Police use.

FYI, not all AR-15's are automatic. In fact, I know for a fact our Police Officer's are not. Also, a 40mm is used commonly for smoke and gas, not explosives.

Get some facts, get some common sense, and shut up.


Not according to the supreme court, or rational possibility. Police exist to take reports AFTER a crime has occurred. ONLY the individual can protect themselves.
 

Triumph

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
15,031
14
81
This is an idiotic statement. Civilians should not be brandishing street justice. It's the Police Offices job to protect the citizens. Not the citizens job to protect themselves out in the street. In their home? Sure. A lot of perps are using some sort of Kevlar vest now days, with the same, or higher powered guns that Police use.

FYI, not all AR-15's are automatic. In fact, I know for a fact our Police Officer's are not. Also, a 40mm is used commonly for smoke and gas, not explosives.

Get some facts, get some common sense, and shut up.

USSC ruled that police have no responsibility to protect the citizenry. Thus every man for himself.

Police have no business using full military style hardware. This isn't Mexico.
 

schneiderguy

Lifer
Jun 26, 2006
10,801
91
91
This is an idiotic statement. Civilians should not be brandishing street justice. It's the Police Offices job to protect the citizens. Not the citizens job to protect themselves out in the street. In their home? Sure. A lot of perps are using some sort of Kevlar vest now days, with the same, or higher powered guns that Police use.

FYI, not all AR-15's are automatic. In fact, I know for a fact our Police Officer's are not. Also, a 40mm is used commonly for smoke and gas, not explosives.

Get some facts, get some common sense, and shut up.

Wow, way to read way too far into what I was saying.

Note I did not say that "citizens should be carrying grenade launchers down the street" like you seem to think I did.

No shit AR-15's are not all automatic, I have one (and it's semi auto :eek:). Note in the OP I said I don't mind police having AR-15s.

Pic related, it's my AR-15. It's sexy :wub:

ayarr1.jpg
 

waggy

No Lifer
Dec 14, 2000
68,143
10
81
Not to feel left out, the Special Emergency Response Team (SERT) in Lancaster, Penn., was recently seen sporting the Lenco BearCat, a camouflage colored Humvee-styled tank that can knock down a wall, pull down a fence, withstand small-arms fire and deliver a dozen heavily armed police officers to a tense emergency scene. The BearCat was purchased a year and a half ago with a $226,224 grant from DHS, yet it has spent nearly two years sitting in a garage at the county's Public Safety Training Center.


lol great use of tax money
 

Triumph

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
15,031
14
81
Not to feel left out, the Special Emergency Response Team (SERT) in Lancaster, Penn., was recently seen sporting the Lenco BearCat, a camouflage colored Humvee-styled tank that can knock down a wall, pull down a fence, withstand small-arms fire and deliver a dozen heavily armed police officers to a tense emergency scene. The BearCat was purchased a year and a half ago with a $226,224 grant from DHS, yet it has spent nearly two years sitting in a garage at the county's Public Safety Training Center.


lol great use of tax money

Lancaster, huh? Yeah, you definitely need an up armored Humvee to contain all of those rowdy Amish!
 

piasabird

Lifer
Feb 6, 2002
17,168
60
91
An AR15 is just a rifle. It is fairly low calaber as the size of the bullet/shell goes.

Civilians can purchase plenty of weapons that are more powerful like a winmag 300, a 30-06, Win 30-30 and the snipers favorite a 308. The .44 is also a nice handgun along with the respectable 357 which is just a .38 on steroids. The standard military issue 45 is also widely available along with all of its variants. There are also available in many places the .49 caliber rifle which was a favorite type of round used in IRAQ because it could shoot straight through a door and body armor.

In the hands of a good shot the range of an M16 was over 1,000 meters. Of course in the middle of a metropolitan area I cant see a long range weapon much use. They are just looking for penetration at that point.
 
Last edited: