Middle Eastern Myths

VioletAura

Banned
Aug 28, 2003
302
0
0
Probably posted before, but worth the read.

Article

Here are a few excerpts:


Israeli peace plan.
Everybody laughed at me and said, ?Oh no, that was just napalm.? I said, ?They?re dropping napalm on a civilian Palestinian village?? And they responded, ?Well, these Palestinians come across the border and put land mines in the fields and bombs in buses, so we have to do this once a week.?

How horrible, Saddam saved the mideast from being overrun by Iran!
rolleye.gif

Saddam calculated that would stop Iran from invading Iraq and the rest of the Arab world.

Who gased the Kurds?
There was a battle in Halabja between the Iranian army and the Iraqi army. The mayor of Halabja, who is related to a man I know here in the United States, said that it was the Iranians who dropped the chemical weapons on the village?not the Iraqis

Oh the oppression of women!
In Iraq, women enjoy many of the equal rights that we do in this country

The evil Ba'ath party:
The Ba?ath Party has a socialist concept and believes in housing and education for people, to be paid for by Iraq?s oil riches

Iraqi elections:
If an election was held in Iraq, he might not have to rig it, contrary to what the American media might contend

Who is the bad guy?
Saddam is a Sunni Muslim and the Shiite Muslims are the more fundamentalist types. They are the ones who resent Saddam?s liberal policies.
The Shiites also resent Saddam, who believes in separation of religion and state. They would rather see a fundamentalist Muslim state.
 

Czar

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
28,510
0
0
On the gassing of the kurds it would not surprise me a bit since the village in question is inside Iraqi borders though it is close to the Iraqi/Iran border and this happened during the war. I have read quite a few stories saying that no one is realy sure who did it.
 

Lonyo

Lifer
Aug 10, 2002
21,938
6
81
As most of that is personal opinion, many will disagree.

I will look at one comment though:
But it was so totally destroyed in 1991 by the U.S.-imposed sanctions which are causing?according to the UN?the deaths of 5,000 children every month. It totals something like nearly two million deaths. For every child that dies, there are five who grow up malnourished to the point that they have brain damage.

Saddamwasbad because he caused many deaths of Iraqi civilians, yet the US caused the deaths of 5,000 children a month after 1991 (up til when it doesn't say), and now they have killed more since the war we had at the beginning of this year.
I'm NOT blaming GWB Jr for this, but the US, who claim they are "freeing the Iraqi people" and stopping however many deaths. But they have also caused many deaths during their time.
Of course, many will argue that the US sanctions were needed, but how can you need to kill 5,000 children a month?
This of course is not the whole picture, as it doesn't state what caused the deaths (lack of medicine/lack of food etc), but Saddam is not the only bad guy here.
 

kaizersose

Golden Member
May 15, 2003
1,196
0
76
the whole article is one woman's view on the middle east and not a factual representation. furthermore, it is a woman who became embittered towards one side of the conflict and has set out to change it.

"I watched a Mirage jet fly over a Palestinian village that was on a hilltop on the other side of the border and watched a mushroom cloud rise over the village as the Mirage returned and flew back into Israel. I had seen pictures of atomic blasts and thought this was what it was, but the cloud was smaller."

napalm doesnt form mushroom clouds. since she is a journalist, maybe she should check out what actually happens before she reports it as fact, especially since the banana pickers who told her this probably arent munitions experts.

"The problem that Israel has with Saddam is its problem with the ideology of the Ba?ath Party, really, even though the Israelis try to personalize the matter, as the Israelis are now trying to do with Yasser Arafat, the leader of the Palestinians. It sounds better, public-relations-wise, if you want to get rid of a ?terrible dictator? as the Israelis have portrayed Saddam, and now Arafat."

uh, yeah. except that they are terrible dictators. its not like saddam shot all these missiles at israel for no reason but to provoke them, or that arafat has been waging a terrorist war against israel since the 60's. really, its all about political beliefs.

"As a momentary digression, I think it is important to reiterate the point you just made: The fact that there was never any such nation as Kuwait until the British created it by taking the land away from Iraq. That fact was hardly ever reported by the American media when Saddam invaded Kuwait in 1990. hat?s right. There was never any such nation as Kuwait. It was just a little town. The Iraqis were traditionally hard to govern and they still are. They are very independent and autonomous-thinking."

uh, news flash, there werent ANY arab nation states until the british divided them up. there was the ottoman empire and there were smaller cities, ruled mostly by powerful tribes (ie: the sauds). before then, the only divisions among the arabs were there religous sect (sunni, shia) and there loyalty to a particular tribe/family.

"There was a battle in Halabja between the Iranian army and the Iraqi army. The mayor of Halabja, who is related to a man I know here in the United States, said that it was the Iranians who dropped the chemical weapons on the village?not the Iraqis?and the Kurds got caught in the cross-fire. It was not done deliberately. "

it is well known that the iraqi general now known as "chemical ali" ordered the attack on Halabja. her proof to the contrary is what an unnamed man told her.

"Iraq and Saddam have never been our enemies. They have always wanted to be our friends. The reason the Gulf War happened in 1991 is because Israel does not want a strong Arab nation in the area."

author = conspiricy theorist.

this article is a roving series of random hearsay, unattributed quotes, personal feelings about a situation and consipiricy theories.

my opinion is that this woman is a raving idiot.

edit:spelling
 

rjain

Golden Member
May 1, 2003
1,475
0
0
Originally posted by: alchemize
Originally posted by: DukeFan21
Saddam apologists are worse than Bush apologists.
He got 100% of the vote! Democracy at work!
Not only 100% of the vote, 100% of the people voted, too. Quite the model democracy. ;)
 

Bowfinger

Lifer
Nov 17, 2002
15,776
392
126
Originally posted by: DukeFan21
Saddam apologists are worse than Bush apologists.
Too bad so many Bush apologists insist that anyone who disagrees with them is a Saddam apologist.
 

maluckey

Platinum Member
Jan 31, 2003
2,933
0
71
Saddam apologists are like the people that claim to have seen Elvis recently. They are not operating on a full deck of cards. He was a thug, and probably deserves worse than he gets.

Next up! Josef Stalin for Sainthood! The ten million that he killed were all criminals and malcontents, the German combat pilots he trained were for crop dusting, and the mass purging of his military officer corp was trimming of the deficit.....................
 

Shad0hawK

Banned
May 26, 2003
1,456
0
0
Originally posted by: Lonyo
As most of that is personal opinion, many will disagree.

I will look at one comment though:
But it was so totally destroyed in 1991 by the U.S.-imposed sanctions which are causing?according to the UN?the deaths of 5,000 children every month. It totals something like nearly two million deaths. For every child that dies, there are five who grow up malnourished to the point that they have brain damage.

Saddamwasbad because he caused many deaths of Iraqi civilians, yet the US caused the deaths of 5,000 children a month after 1991 (up til when it doesn't say), and now they have killed more since the war we had at the beginning of this year.
I'm NOT blaming GWB Jr for this, but the US, who claim they are "freeing the Iraqi people" and stopping however many deaths. But they have also caused many deaths during their time.
Of course, many will argue that the US sanctions were needed, but how can you need to kill 5,000 children a month?
This of course is not the whole picture, as it doesn't state what caused the deaths (lack of medicine/lack of food etc), but Saddam is not the only bad guy here.

actually it was UN...(including france and germany BTW)NOT "US" sanctions, and food medicine and other supplies were sent to the people of iraq, and then were promptly warehoused by the baath socialist elite and distributed how they saw fit, i guess not many people remember all this being found, it was shown live on all the networks.

like the vast majority of socialist states(as the history of the 20th century has demonstrated), it ended up a dictatorship with the socialist political elite getting the food...the money, and living in mansions with rooms full of gold plated guns, drugs, booze and jacuzzi's while the people starved.

no one is to blame for that except the people who did it. the iraqi govt.

 

Czar

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
28,510
0
0
Originally posted by: Shad0hawK
Originally posted by: Lonyo
As most of that is personal opinion, many will disagree.

I will look at one comment though:
But it was so totally destroyed in 1991 by the U.S.-imposed sanctions which are causing?according to the UN?the deaths of 5,000 children every month. It totals something like nearly two million deaths. For every child that dies, there are five who grow up malnourished to the point that they have brain damage.

Saddamwasbad because he caused many deaths of Iraqi civilians, yet the US caused the deaths of 5,000 children a month after 1991 (up til when it doesn't say), and now they have killed more since the war we had at the beginning of this year.
I'm NOT blaming GWB Jr for this, but the US, who claim they are "freeing the Iraqi people" and stopping however many deaths. But they have also caused many deaths during their time.
Of course, many will argue that the US sanctions were needed, but how can you need to kill 5,000 children a month?
This of course is not the whole picture, as it doesn't state what caused the deaths (lack of medicine/lack of food etc), but Saddam is not the only bad guy here.

actually it was UN...(including france and germany BTW)NOT "US" sanctions, and food medicine and other supplies were sent to the people of iraq, and then were promptly warehoused by the baath socialist elite and distributed how they saw fit, i guess not many people remember all this being found, it was shown live on all the networks.

like the vast majority of socialist states(as the history of the 20th century has demonstrated), it ended up a dictatorship with the socialist political elite getting the food...the money, and living in mansions with rooms full of gold plated guns, drugs, booze and jacuzzi's while the people starved.

no one is to blame for that except the people who did it. the iraqi govt.
actually no, the supplies were not distributed well enough because of lack of UN personel to do the distrobuting because there were so little funds for that job.

and that vast majority of socialist states comment is a complete bullocks