mid-range system question....xp vs. 64

nny

Member
Mar 26, 2004
115
0
0
so i'm going to be building a mid-range system for my brother in a month. he's looking to spend about 1k on it, and will be using it to rip/play dvds and some minor gaming. I just built a system for myself (64 3000, asus k8vse, 9800pro) but i'm wondering if a 64 is overkill for him, or if its a good investment. would you still suggest a barton 2800/9600pro setup for someone who wont be playing the latest games, or is the performance/insurance difference on a 64 3000 that much better when 64 windows comes along?
 

n0cmonkey

Elite Member
Jun 10, 2001
42,936
1
0
Personally, I don't see a reason to buy anything other than AMD64 chips now.

But he could definitely save some money getting an Athlon XP.
 

Runner20

Senior member
May 31, 2004
478
0
0
It all depends on the budget. If you want to save cash then get Athlon XP, otherwise get 64 2800. Those XP's are still fast today so you wont be making a bad choice if you went that route.
 

DerwenArtos12

Diamond Member
Apr 7, 2003
4,278
0
0
I have an athlon xp oced to 2.4ghz. I play and rip and burn dvd's, and play games on my time off work, becoming less and less every week it seems. I am going to hold on to my system fro a few months yet. I am starting to see the age of it though. I build a couple computers a day and repair as many as I can get my hands on so I sede teh differences betwwen them. A64's are much faster, especially in burning and ripping dvd's. I am also going to suggest getting him windows xp, I have found through it's media optimizations it will ripo and burn and play faster than the less cpu streesful 2k.
 

0roo0roo

No Lifer
Sep 21, 2002
64,795
84
91
frys 2500+ and m/b combo for like 60bux. cost/perf ratio is unbeatable. put extra money into vid card.
 

AnnoyedGrunt

Senior member
Jan 31, 2004
596
25
81
For $1000 I'd get an A64 3000 (EDIT: it looks like 2800 is more realistic for cost) and a 9800pro and 1GB of RAM and then try to squeeze the rest of the stuff in under budget. That setup should leave about $350-$400 for Case, PSU, HDD, MB, and CD/DVD. I'd drop down to a 2800 plus if I had to make some sacrifices.

Another option is a P4 2.8 or 3.0 Northwood. They run about the same price as the equivalent A64 but are not as good as games but better @ encoding (not sure if that is necessary for the DVD stuff, or if it is only MP3's).

Anyway does that $1000 include a monitor, or does he already have that?

If I were buying now I'd probably get:

Proc 2800+ = $190
RAM 1GB = $200
MB = $140
Case + PSU = $100
Video 9800pro = $210
DVD RW = $80
HDD 120 GB = $80

Total = $1100 (could probably find some better deals to get around $1000)

-D'oh!
 

nny

Member
Mar 26, 2004
115
0
0
yah, its looking more and more like a 64 is the way to go in terms of lasting power. i'll probably get him a 3000 (so he gets a 2ghz), 512 of ram so he can upgrade it in a year or so. a couple of questions:

1. should i get him 3500 ram or just 3200, since he's not going to be overclocking. i was looking at mushkin lvl1 3500 for about 150$, but is there a better deal?

2. since he's not itching for doom3 or hl2 (he's still playing diablo2 believe it or not), is a 9600pro sufficient for all recent games? he'll probably get CoD, but he's not an avid gamer.

3. what mobo should i use? i know there was a recent generation of new ones, but do they offer significant advantages over, say, an asus k8vse?


thanks