• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Microsoft Windows liscensing agreements?

MrWhiteUK

Senior member
With all the talk about the upcoming Windows XP, liscensing has been brought up several times, especially regarding previous versions of WIndows, 98 etc.


I think that everyone knows when you buy a copy of Windows you can use it on ONE machine only.

Some people have also stated that if you change your comp you have to buy another copy of Windows. Is this just if you had an OEM ver supplied with that machine or is it also if you have bought a retail box version too?

Now alot of people who claim to have nothing to do with software piracy, do these people buy a new copy when they move on to their new machines? I'm talking mainly to those who build their own machine as most pre-built are supplied with a copy of windows.

I expect even the most anti software piracy person still uses the same Win disc when they move on to their next machine (providng they remove it from the previous machine)

Another good point raised is, If you're a frequent upgrader when does your machine actually become a 'new' machine?

For example I recieved a copy of Win98 with one of my machines a couple of years ago, that machine has gone (with the OS wiped) I kept the CD and installed it on my new machine, am I still legal? I now want to buy a student upgrade of Win2k which requires me to have a previous copy of Windows, if my win98 is not legal, my 2k won't be neither will it? Or what if I get this upgrade and then SELL my 98 cd after I have aquired the upgrade,still legal? Confuesed yet, cos I am.

I expect I'm not the only one who has moved windows from one machine to another (still only ONE copy installed on ONE machine) So what is the point in me LEGALLY obtaining following versions of windows if my 98 is void, I might as well get copied software if that is the case.

I paid for that software I should be able to use it on ANY machine (as long as it's only one at a time, I agree with that) for the rest of my life if I so choose.

I think M$'s licensing agreements are so strict, along with the extortionate(sp) prices is why people resort to piracy.

p.s If I have anything wrong regarding the EULA please inform me.


Windows 98 EULA link
 
OEM version = one O/S on one specific machine forever
Retail version = one O/S on one machine at any one time

Nobody has contested the licensing in civil court in the U.S., but their was some hamming over it in Europe. I don't know what ever came of it if its even made it into court yet. They did lose some court cases in two countries in Africa that basically said "you (Microsoft) charge too much so everyone can have it for free now".
 
Can you explain your OEM part, when you say 'forever' do you mean you can't transfer between machines (still kepping on ONE only at a time) like from old machine to new machine, if that is the case then I think it's BS. M$ can go....themselfs.
 
Germany's highest court ruled about a year ago that unbundling and reselling OEM copies of Windows is perfectly legal.

MS's policy is that an OEM copy is only licensed for the computer it came with, and the license is not transferrable to another computer. However, MS can go to hell as far as I'm concerned. What defines the computer my "non-crippled" OEM copy of Win98 is supposed to run on? I've upgraded my hard drive, video card, and I'm planning on a motherboard/CPU upgrade sometime this summer. At what point is my computer a different one, according to them? Bah. They're not going to stop me, and I sure as hell am not buying XP.
 
Back
Top