Originally posted by: networkman
Thanks for the link, Jack! 🙂
Originally posted by: RebateMonger
Here's the main Virtual PC 2004 web page:
MIcrosoft VPC 2004 Site
It's great to see this. VPC 2004 is a really wonderful program.
Originally posted by: sonoma1993
Originally posted by: RebateMonger
Here's the main Virtual PC 2004 web page:
MIcrosoft VPC 2004 Site
It's great to see this. VPC 2004 is a really wonderful program.
microsoft mention that they are also offering a free download of Virtual PC 2007. Is it not out yet or do I have to search the microsoft site for it?
Originally posted by: RebateMonger
Here's the main Virtual PC 2004 web page:
MIcrosoft VPC 2004 Site
It's great to see this. VPC 2004 is a really wonderful program.
I do not take my kids to school with Ugly heavy Bulldozer that uses services and impact the system even when you do not use it; my Good nice SUV does it very well.Originally posted by: spike spiegal
It's free because VMare's product is.
FYI - the VMware product is better.
Well, I'm not aware of any real reason not to use Virtual Server in place of Virtual PC. I have to admit stupidity and laziness. I tried loading Virtual Server 2005 on my office PC and had problems getting it to run properly. Being lazy, I removed it and am sticking with Virtual PC for now. 😱Originally posted by: jlbenedict
How does VPC 2004 compare to Microsoft's other free product, Virtual Server 2005 R2??
I wouldnt say VMWare workstation is *that* much better than Virtual PC (it does have some extra features, but for testing/training purposes it doesnt offer much).Originally posted by: spike spiegal
It's free because VMare's product is.
FYI - the VMware product is better.
No that's the full deal, just the way that it's labled makes it look like it's *only* a service pack.Originally posted by: ms526
They're not offering the program free, that's the service pack for the program. not the program itself!
Yeah, that's what I thought at first...but it's the full program.Originally posted by: ms526
They're not offering the program free, that's the service pack for the program. not the program itself!
I've seen a lot of varying benchmarks and dont have a reason to believe either is a clear leader (comparing VPC versus VMWare Workstation); VM additions, Guest OS and Host OS all play a very big part in the differant results (reminds me of the "who is faster, NVidia or ATI" question, the answer is not so clear-cut).All the benchmarks comparing VMware vs MS's product show VMware winning handily in terms of performance.
Of course, with server 2003 enterprise you can run 4 instances plus a host on a hardware platform regardless of what virtualization software you use so they *still* make their money.Microsoft could care less anyways since they make most of their money of *licenses* and not platform deployments. Money an IT dept doesn't spend on server/desktop hardware it doesn't need will likely be spent on, you guessed it, software. Hell, for that matter, pay people to use it if you get my drift.