Exactly what market is that?Microsoft needed to get back into the market that Linux was taking away.
Originally posted by: Bateluer
Best thing MS could do would be to develop a linux version of DirectX, that would allow many more games to be easily ported over to linux, thus boosting its sales.
Second thing that linux needs to do, and this is going to be like throwing gas a fire with the linux people here, but the command line needs to go. Every common task and most T/S needs to be able to be done from the GUI, or you will score points with Joe Blow.
Originally posted by: greylica
Take away the command line ?
OMG this guy is crazy, Windows did With Vista the best thing that we already have in years in Linux, its very simple.
Windows ever had the run tool , but it never really function cause not all the software was really backed by a database. Thanks for god today we only and simply click on the bash and digit the name of the software, voi-lá, it runs, avoid thirteen clicks, digiting, GENIAL !!
It can be done in every part of the system !!!
Better than this, we don need it !!!
Mwahaha !!!
Which growing Linux market? Desktop (hahahaha!!) or server (actual good growth)?And stash the growing Linux market, that MS wants a piece of
Best thing MS could do would be to develop a linux version of DirectX, that would allow many more games to be easily ported over to linux, thus boosting its sales.
Every common task and most T/S needs to be able to be done from the GUI, or you will score points with Joe Blow.
Which growing Linux market? Desktop (hahahaha!!) or server (actual good growth)?
LOTD...aaaaaaany day now
Yes, that is definitely part of it. Getting VM additions for *nix hosts is difficult, since it requires source...something that is pretty much impossible for any MS employee (legal reasons).Actually I think it's the VM market. In order to compete with VMWare (and eventually Xen) MS has to support more than just Windows on Virtual Server.
Who knew that all this time LOTD meant LONothinmansD?It's been on my desktop for years.
Yes, that is definitely part of it. Getting VM additions for *nix hosts is difficult, since it requires source...something that is pretty much impossible for any MS employee (legal reasons).
Who knew that all this time LOTD meant LONothinmansD?
I guess whether Apple is a success on the desktop depends on who you ask. I would say that OS X is more successful than Linux is to date. OS X has carved out a market share for itself as the OS of choice for artists, people who like cool, etc. OSX has proven itself to be easy to use, secure, blah blah.When do we consider LoTD to be a success? Apple has a miniscule amount of users compared to MS and yet people still consider OS X on the desktop a reality so why should Linux be any different?
Originally posted by: stash
I guess whether Apple is a success on the desktop depends on who you ask. I would say that OS X is more successful than Linux is to date. OS X has carved out a market share for itself as the OS of choice for artists, people who like cool, etc. OSX has proven itself to be easy to use, secure, blah blah.When do we consider LoTD to be a success? Apple has a miniscule amount of users compared to MS and yet people still consider OS X on the desktop a reality so why should Linux be any different?
What marketshare does Linux have in the consumer market? It's free, secure and stable, and people still choose Apple or PC over it in large quantities. If "Linux" can figure out why that is, and provide a compelling alternative that appeals to the market, then LOTD will be more successful.
