Microsoft pledges to 'lead the way' in PC gaming

CurseTheSky

Diamond Member
Oct 21, 2006
5,401
2
0
I'd rather let Valve lead the way, personally. They're one of the few companies I feel that I can rely on to churn out a decent game every time.
 

Maximilian

Lifer
Feb 8, 2004
12,604
15
81
I'd rather let Valve lead the way, personally. They're one of the few companies I feel that I can rely on to churn out a decent game every time.

Yeah this, microsoft dosent have a clue what PC gamers want/need, valve has a much better idea.
 
Jun 22, 2009
151
0
71
not likely anytime soon
they barely have the studios to churn out good Xbox exclusives
I doubt they could bring out enough quality games to make GFWL all that popular compared to Steam
 

Bateluer

Lifer
Jun 23, 2001
27,730
8
0
Uh, Age of Empires Online . . . I don't know if I'd want my name attached to that and advertised anywhere Microsoft. ;)

Microsoft may want to lead, but until they show people that they can make or publish a decent PC game, they'll be wandering alone.
 

lupi

Lifer
Apr 8, 2001
32,539
260
126
Microsoft Game Studios manager Kudo Tsunoda has been aggressively talking up Xbox 360 Kinect in the last few days, and while doing so he's expressed his opinion on the current state of PC gaming
. According to him, Halo is responsible for "hardly anyone" playing first-person shooters on the PC nowadays.
"Halo did an awesome job of building a first-person shooter exclusively for the console, and now hardly anyone plays first person shooters on the PC anymore," the Microsoft spokesperson told GameInformer (via Neowin). "It's all about the console."



wow, can't believe he even tried to let that one fly.
 

CurseTheSky

Diamond Member
Oct 21, 2006
5,401
2
0
Meh. Nothing but overrated first person shooters.

I disagree:

  • HL / HL2 were great games for their time.
  • EP1 was mediocre, but EP2 was great.
  • TF2 is loved by many gamers (I personally don't care for it).
  • CS / CS: S are considered to be some of the best competitive / tournament FPS's available, with UT99 / UT2004 being the only real competition that I can think of (and both are dead in comparison population wise).
  • L4D / L4D2 aren't perfect, but they're some of the best co-op FPS games to come out lately and really have a polished feel and great game balanced compared to what's out there, especially connectivity wise.
  • Portal was pure gold as well.
 

PingSpike

Lifer
Feb 25, 2004
21,756
600
126
Microsoft doesn't give a shit about PC Gaming. Talking out of both sides of their mouth aside, actions speak louder than words. Microsoft has been content to cannibalize PC studios to boost Xbox sales when they took any action besides sitting on their hands.
 

PingSpike

Lifer
Feb 25, 2004
21,756
600
126
Meh. Nothing but overrated first person shooters.

The overratedness of their house developed titles is a matter of opinion. However, Steam is a juggernaut that has changed the way games are sold and played on the platform.
 

spaceman

Lifer
Dec 4, 2000
17,616
183
106
valve rocks
they make straight up awesome games
l4d series is the best coop game of ALL time..imo
hl2 tf2 and on and on
valve has gamers interests if not at heart..close by.
i <3 valve
 

motsm

Golden Member
Jan 20, 2010
1,822
2
76
  • CS / CS: S are considered to be some of the best competitive / tournament FPS's available, with UT99 / UT2004 being the only real competition that I can think of (and both are dead in comparison population wise).
Quake 3 Arena was always the king of competitive shooters. Not to mention Quake Live is quite active online, and has profesionally organized tournaments held as well.
 

KaOTiK

Lifer
Feb 5, 2001
10,877
8
81
When I read this I nearly choked on the twizzler I was eating.

They need to fucking wake up and realize no one on the PC side is drinking their koolaid.
 

Mr. Pedantic

Diamond Member
Feb 14, 2010
5,027
0
76
I disagree:

  • HL / HL2 were great games for their time.
  • EP1 was mediocre, but EP2 was great.
  • TF2 is loved by many gamers (I personally don't care for it).
  • CS / CS: S are considered to be some of the best competitive / tournament FPS's available, with UT99 / UT2004 being the only real competition that I can think of (and both are dead in comparison population wise).
  • L4D / L4D2 aren't perfect, but they're some of the best co-op FPS games to come out lately and really have a polished feel and great game balanced compared to what's out there, especially connectivity wise.
  • Portal was pure gold as well.
Note that they're all First Person Shooters. I don't know about anyone else, but I want more from my games than shooting anything that moves.
 
Oct 27, 2007
17,009
5
0
By the way the OP is horribly misleading. MS didn't "pledge" shit and they certainly didn't claim to be leaders currently. The actual quote:
"Other companies should look to Microsoft for leadership, but I'm not sure they do," said Microsoft Game Studios general manager Dave Luehmann. "It is our job to lead the way on PC. And in some ways we are doing that and in other ways we are not. So we need to step up."
Sounds to me like they are aware of their weaknesses, which may even mean they'll work to correct them. I don't see how this is a bad thing.
 

lupi

Lifer
Apr 8, 2001
32,539
260
126
By the way the OP is horribly misleading. MS didn't "pledge" shit and they certainly didn't claim to be leaders currently. The actual quote:
Sounds to me like they are aware of their weaknesses, which may even mean they'll work to correct them. I don't see how this is a bad thing.

and the UP is, as usual, a tard of the first degree since the OP statement is the title of the linked article.
 

Maximilian

Lifer
Feb 8, 2004
12,604
15
81
Sounds to me like they are aware of their weaknesses, which may even mean they'll work to correct them. I don't see how this is a bad thing.

Yeah its only taken them a few years to become "aware" of it, maybe in the next few decades they will get round to actually doing somthing about it.
 

BladeVenom

Lifer
Jun 2, 2005
13,365
16
0
Microsoft doesn't give a shit about PC Gaming. Talking out of both sides of their mouth aside, actions speak louder than words. Microsoft has been content to cannibalize PC studios to boost Xbox sales when they took any action besides sitting on their hands.
+1. Converting all their PC gaming studios to Xbox gaming studios, or shutting them down is not leading the way in PC gaming. Neither is buying the rights to publish games, and then forcing the developers into making it into a Xbox exclusive, or timed exclusive.

Actions speak louder than words, and Microsoft's actions have proven them be worse than Jack Thompson when it comes to PC gaming.
 

Jumpem

Lifer
Sep 21, 2000
10,757
3
81
[/LIST]
Note that they're all First Person Shooters. I don't know about anyone else, but I want more from my games than shooting anything that moves.

This. I've been playing FPS since Wolfenstein 3D. Somewhere around HL 1, I lost interest. They're all just rehashes of other games I've played a thousand times a decade ago. Just with prettier graphics.
 

Qbah

Diamond Member
Oct 18, 2005
3,754
10
81
What a load of crap. I think they're all drunk at MS... Seems they can't make up their mind on this. One of the commenters summed it up nicely though:

judging by comments recently from the Microsoft camp, they would only be "leading the way" over a cliff, and hoping the industry follows like lemmings... If they had their way, the PC gaming industry carcass would end up right next to the Blu-Ray carcass at the bottom of the cliff.
 

Jumpem

Lifer
Sep 21, 2000
10,757
3
81
What a load of crap. I think they're all drunk at MS... Seems they can't make up their mind on this. One of the commenters summed it up nicely though:

I don't see why Microsoft would want PC gaming to die though. It's one of the main advantages of their OS.