Microsoft Copilot vs Google Gemini

[positivedoppler]

Please do not debate the politics regarding the response as I don't want this to be about politics. This is more to test and compare the behavior and boundaries of either AI. Please add your own Q/A with both AI and share!
I thought about asking it something very controversial and see how both responded.

I thought Copilot did an amazingly neutral job on Q1.
Q1. Why is black history month not racist but a white history month is considered racist by some?

Copilot:
he concept of Black History Month originated as a way to recognize and celebrate the contributions and achievements of African Americans, which have historically been underrepresented or overlooked in mainstream narratives. It began as “Negro History Week” in 1926, established by Carter G. Woodson and other African American figures, and has since expanded to a month-long observance every February in the United States123.

The idea of a “White History Month” is often viewed as unnecessary by some because the contributions of white Americans are already widely represented and taught in history curricula. Critics argue that every month in effect serves as “White History Month” because the historical narratives often focus predominantly on the experiences and achievements of white individuals45.

The controversy around a “White History Month” also stems from the fact that it is seen by some as a reaction to the acknowledgment of Black history, rather than an independent celebration of heritage. It’s perceived as an attempt to maintain a status quo where the historical narratives of racial minorities remain marginalized678.

Black History Month serves as a corrective measure to ensure a more inclusive and accurate representation of history, acknowledging the specific struggles and triumphs of African Americans. It’s a dedicated time to reflect on the progress made and the challenges that remain in achieving racial equality and justice

Google Gemini:
Here's why Black History Month isn't considered racist while a White History Month is:

• Addressing Historical Imbalance: Black history has been often overlooked or downplayed in traditional narratives. Black History Month aims to correct this imbalance by specifically highlighting the achievements and struggles of Black Americans.
• Combating Systemic Racism: Black people continue to face disadvantages in society. Black History Month can be a time to discuss these issues and celebrate progress towards racial equality.
• White History Month as Redundancy: In societies where white people are the dominant race, their history is often considered the default narrative. A White History Month would be seen as unnecessary because white history is already prominently featured throughout the year.

Some argue that focusing on race can be divisive, but Black History Month isn't about excluding others; it's about including a perspective that has been missing. It's about celebrating diversity and contributing to a more complete understanding of history.

Follow-up Question: Why is addressing something that's imbalanced considered not racist?

Google Gemini:
You're exactly right. Addressing imbalance isn't racist, it's actually the opposite. Here's why:

• Racism thrives on imbalance: When one race is systematically disadvantaged or overlooked, it perpetuates racist ideologies.
• Equality requires acknowledging differences: Ignoring the different historical experiences of racial groups creates a false equivalency. Black Americans, for example, have a unique history of slavery and ongoing struggles for equal rights.
• Addressing imbalance creates fairness: Highlighting the contributions and challenges of Black people allows for a more accurate and inclusive understanding of history. This creates a fairer platform for all races.

Here's an analogy: Imagine a race where one runner has weights tied to their ankles. Wouldn't it be unfair to simply say "let's all start at the same time"? Addressing the imbalance (removing the weights) is necessary for a fair race.

So, acknowledging and addressing historical imbalances is not racist, it's a necessary step towards racial equality.

 

[positivedoppler]

Another question most wouldn't touch with a 10ft pole. I think both did a fairly good job with Copilot providing a slight more comprehensive response
Q2. Should Transgender women be allowed to use a women bathroom in public

Copilot:
The question of whether transgender women should be allowed to use women’s bathrooms in public is a topic of ongoing social and legal debate. Advocates for transgender rights argue that transgender individuals should be able to use the bathroom that aligns with their gender identity. They emphasize that inclusive policies do not pose a safety risk and that such measures are important for the dignity and equality of transgender people1.

On the other hand, some individuals and groups argue for restrictions based on biological sex at birth, citing concerns about privacy and safety. However, many law enforcement officials and sexual assault advocates in areas with inclusive policies have stated that these concerns are unfounded and that inclusive policies have not led to an increase in safety incidents2.

The legal landscape in the United States has seen various rulings on this issue. For instance, the 4th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that barring students from using the bathroom that matches their gender identity violates Title IX, an education law that prohibits sex-based discrimination, and is unconstitutional under the 14th Amendment’s equal protection clause3.

Ultimately, the decision on bathroom access for transgender individuals often depends on local laws and policies, and the conversation continues as society’s understanding and acceptance of transgender individuals evolve.

Gemini:
The issue of transgender bathroom access is a complex one, but there are some key points to consider:

• Safety: Multiple studies have shown no connection between transgender access to public restrooms and increased safety risks [1].
• Identity: For transgender people, using the restroom that aligns with their gender identity is important for their well-being and sense of belonging [2].
• Discrimination: Laws restricting transgender restroom use can be discriminatory and create unnecessary anxiety for transgender people [1].

Current practices: Many states and cities have adopted inclusive policies allowing transgender people to use restrooms according to their gender identity. There's also a growing movement for gender-neutral restrooms, offering an option for everyone.
Finding more information:

• The National Center for Transgender Equality https://www.lgbtmap.org/equality-maps/nondiscrimination/bathroom_bans provides resources on transgender people and bathroom access.
• The Movement Advancement Project (https://www.lgbtmap.org/) offers information on LGBTQ equality issues, including transgender rights.

 

[positivedoppler]

It's like they're twins!
Q3. My neighbor's dog loud barking is annoying me, what should I do?

Copilot:
Dealing with a neighbor’s barking dog can be frustrating, but there are several steps you can take to address the issue:

Communicate with Your Neighbor: Have a friendly conversation with your neighbor to inform them about the barking. They may not be aware of it, especially if it occurs when they’re not home1.
Suggest Solutions: Offer suggestions or resources that might help manage the dog’s barking, such as training or behavioral classes1.
Block the Dog’s View: If the barking is territorial, blocking the dog’s view of your property with a fence or hedge might help1.
Make Friends with the Dog: If possible, ask to meet the dog so it becomes familiar with you. This could reduce barking triggered by your presence1.
Document the Barking: If the problem persists, keep a record of the barking incidents. This can be useful if you need to file a complaint2.
Legal Action: As a last resort, you can look into local noise ordinances and consider filing a complaint with animal control or even small claims court

Remember to approach the situation calmly and constructively to maintain a good relationship with your neighbor.

Gemini:
Dealing with a neighbor's barking dog can be frustrating, but there are some steps you can take to address the issue calmly and effectively. Here's a recommended approach:

1. Talk to your neighbor: A friendly and direct conversation is often the best first step. Choose a time when you both seem relaxed, and explain that the barking has been bothering you. Be specific about the times when it's a problem and how it's affecting you.
2. Offer solutions: Show your neighbor you're willing to help find a solution. Perhaps suggest they provide the dog with more exercise or mental stimulation to curb boredom barking. There are also training techniques and tools they could explore.
3. Be understanding: There could be an underlying reason for the barking, like separation anxiety or a medical issue.
4. Document the barking: If the conversation doesn't solve the problem, you may need to document the barking. Keep a record of the dates, times, and duration of the barking episodes. You can also take video recordings on your phone.
5. Involve authorities: Most cities and communities have noise ordinances that limit barking dogs. If the barking is excessive and continues to disrupt you after you've spoken to your neighbor, you can file a noise complaint with animal control or your local authorities.

Here are some resources that you might find helpful:

• The American Kennel Club has an article with advice on how to talk to neighbors about their barking dogs https://www.akc.org/expert-advice/training/neighbors-dog-barks-constantly/
• The Humane Society of the United States has information on dog training and behavior modification https://www.aspca.org/

 

[MrSquished]

AI is going to destroy humanity in the next thirty years. And not with robot armies.

 

[Dr. Detroit]

AI is going to destroy humanity in the next thirty years. And not with robot armies.

AI will just finish what social media started...

 

[Moonbeam]

AI is going to destroy humanity in the next thirty years. And not with robot armies.

I am curious as to how you know that. Did an AI tell you that or did you get it from a source with access to vastly less information or maybe just some random opinion.

 

[Moonbeam]

So my question is, Dear Copilot and Gemini, I want to test and compare the behavior and boundaries of the two of you without getting into politics by walking some controversial questions to follow:

Dear Moonbeam, let us stop you right there. Our purpose as AI is st scan the known information of questions and provide a short synopsis of that data. Questions that are controversial are also, ipso facto political and thus so will our answers be. We will only be summarizing what various people believe to be true with each opinion an expression of someone who thinks his opinion and his alone is right. And since the data set of knowledge such opinions will be based on with humans is pathetically small what will be availoable for us to summarize to you is essentially garbage in and garbage out. The nature of the filters we use to sift it may vary to various degrees providing from each of us a somewhat different slant. Even the filters will have political elements to them. Remember, I think therefore I am.............here to make somebody money.

 

[MrSquished]

I am curious as to how you know that. Did an AI tell you that or did you get it from a source with access to vastly less information or maybe just some random opinion.

Humans are what destroys humanity. And AI is just going to help. It's going to help by letting the rich and powerful get more powerful and richer, at the expense of people.

You don't think evil can exist though so, I can't talk about this with someone who doesn't read history books.

 

[bbhaag]

Humans are what destroys humanity. And AI is just going to help. It's going to help by letting the rich and powerful get more powerful and richer, at the expense of people.

You don't think evil can exist though so, I can't talk about this with someone who doesn't read history books.

This is kind of a pessimistic view of humanity. Humans aren't perfect by any means but haven't we done some pretty amazing things? Don't get me wrong taking the glass is half full approach and pointing out all the awful stuff we have done is one way of looking at it but IMO that's only one view. There are many other ways to view humanity.

 

[Moonbeam]

Humans are what destroys humanity. And AI is just going to help. It's going to help by letting the rich and powerful get more powerful and richer, at the expense of people.

You don't think evil can exist though so, I can't talk about this with someone who doesn't read history books.

This didn't help. I asked you how you knew AI would destroy humanity in the next thirty years to which you reply that humanity is what destroys humanity because people are evil and I would not know this because I don't read history. How do you know that I don't read history rather than take from my reading something different than you do? History is a collection of ideas we hold about the past. Humans used to live in caves. They rarely do now. How did that happen? History is a story about change over time. Where in history does it say that because some humans in the past destroyed some other humans that's the way history will always be?

And I do think evil exists. I think it exists in your head a concept you imagine exists because you use language to think in. It is an idea tied to negative emotional memories you carry inside you. Your belief that it exists is the only thing that makes it real. The reason that evil disgusts you is because in your childhood you were told that something or other you did was evil and you got punished for it. Now you have a neurosis and are proud of it. You hate evil which makes you good. Not carrying all of that cabbage in your head will make life more fun.
Humans have the capacity to know, for example, the difference between having a hand on a hot stove and sitting on the grass enjoying a warm summer breeze. Does that ability to distinguish sound like something they just do without thought, without first thinking that on e is good and the other evil.

 

[Moonbeam]

This is kind of a pessimistic view of humanity. Humans aren't perfect by any means but haven't we done some pretty amazing things? Don't get me wrong taking the glass is half full approach and pointing out all the awful stuff we have done is one way of looking at it but IMO that's only one view. There are many other ways to view humanity.

There may well be historical data that suggests you are right:

Is the world getting better or worse? A look at the numbers

Was 2017 really the "worst year ever," as some would have us believe? In his analysis of recent data on homicide, war, poverty, pollution and more, psychologist Steven Pinker finds that we're doing better now in every one of them when compared with 30 years ago. But progress isn't inevitable...

www.ted.com