http://www.anandtech.com/bench/defa...=65.66.67.68.69.70.71.72.73.74.75.78.79.80.81
Please correct me if I'm wrong!
1. Intel crushes Micron in random writes!!
2. Micron crushes Intel in sequential writes!!
3. Micron has a slight advantage in both random reads and sequential reads.
(Please see the last four benchmarks.)
I would assume that the remaining benchmarks can largely be understood in terms of the above results. For example, the "AnandTech Storage Bench -- Heavy Workload" has been described as follows:
"The benchmark is 22 minutes long and it consists of 128,895 read operations and 72,411 write operations. Roughly 44% of all IOs were sequential." http://www.anandtech.com/storage/showdoc.aspx?i=3702&p=12
Thus, this benchmark would play to Micron's strengths because it has a lot of sequential IOs and a lot of read operations.
Presumably random writes are more important for say, the "PCMark Vantage - Gaming Suite" which thus favors Intel?
Please correct me if I'm wrong!
1. Intel crushes Micron in random writes!!
2. Micron crushes Intel in sequential writes!!
3. Micron has a slight advantage in both random reads and sequential reads.
(Please see the last four benchmarks.)
I would assume that the remaining benchmarks can largely be understood in terms of the above results. For example, the "AnandTech Storage Bench -- Heavy Workload" has been described as follows:
"The benchmark is 22 minutes long and it consists of 128,895 read operations and 72,411 write operations. Roughly 44% of all IOs were sequential." http://www.anandtech.com/storage/showdoc.aspx?i=3702&p=12
Thus, this benchmark would play to Micron's strengths because it has a lot of sequential IOs and a lot of read operations.
Presumably random writes are more important for say, the "PCMark Vantage - Gaming Suite" which thus favors Intel?
Facebook
Twitter