Howdy 
I was just wondering if anyone knew of how to remove a Micro-PGA1/uPGA1 cpu from a notebook motherboard, as I have taken the notebook apart several times, and have not figured out how to pop the cpu out of the socket. The notebook in question is a Twinhead Slimnote VXe.
I have one other question regarding the Micro-PGA1/uPGA1 cpus from Intel. There are two processors that I was thinking of, a Pentium II @ 400 MHz (The mobile Pentium II processor at 400 MHz is Intel's first processor built using Intel's 0.18 micron manufacturing process, so less heat is put out!) or the Intel Celeron @ 400 MHz.
I've looked at everything regarding the upgrade, and the notebook will accept either cpu, but I was more concerned with performance.
Would the mobile Pentium II at 400 MHz be faster because of the 256 K of integrated level 2 cache as opposed to the Celeron processor @ 400 MHz which is manufactured on the Intel 0.25 micron process and contains 128 K of integrated level 2 cache?
There used to be a performance comparison chart on Intel's website, but that has since been removed.
Thanks in advance
TextyellowCeleron processor 400 MHz is manufactured on the Intel 0.25 micron process and contains 128 K of integrated level 2 cacheremove a Micro-PGA1/uPGA1
I was just wondering if anyone knew of how to remove a Micro-PGA1/uPGA1 cpu from a notebook motherboard, as I have taken the notebook apart several times, and have not figured out how to pop the cpu out of the socket. The notebook in question is a Twinhead Slimnote VXe.
I have one other question regarding the Micro-PGA1/uPGA1 cpus from Intel. There are two processors that I was thinking of, a Pentium II @ 400 MHz (The mobile Pentium II processor at 400 MHz is Intel's first processor built using Intel's 0.18 micron manufacturing process, so less heat is put out!) or the Intel Celeron @ 400 MHz.
I've looked at everything regarding the upgrade, and the notebook will accept either cpu, but I was more concerned with performance.
Would the mobile Pentium II at 400 MHz be faster because of the 256 K of integrated level 2 cache as opposed to the Celeron processor @ 400 MHz which is manufactured on the Intel 0.25 micron process and contains 128 K of integrated level 2 cache?
There used to be a performance comparison chart on Intel's website, but that has since been removed.
Thanks in advance