Originally posted by: M0RPH
Originally posted by: Painman
It would seem that a MI Caucus would be a CINO (Caucus In Name Only).
It's anonymous.
It's not held at 7 in the evening.
Mail-in votes are a distinct possibility, as are online votes.
At least that's what I can gather, after sorting through the partisan chaff.
http://www.dailykos.com/storyo...181841/8676/104/470777
Personally I wouldn't object to something like that.
It would still be limited in hours and locations. In the link you give someone says 10am-6pm. Great, what about the people who actually have jobs. The more limitations like this, the more like a caucus it is and the more it will be skewed towards Obama. Clinton will not accept this and she shouldn't.
Florida does not need a revote. The disadvantage to Obama in FL because of his lack of campaigning and name recognition is nothing compared to the heavy advantages he has had due to the caucus voting in numerous states.
Ignore the points that disfavor your argument, employ the parts that do. The guy who sells blinders doesn't care which party you belong to, it seems. Business is good for him these days. Can't blame him.
The details are yet to be sorted out, but it seems that online and mail-in voting are real possibilities.
Lemme riddle you this: I AM a Dem partisan, an Obama partisan, but I know exactly and precisely why. It's got a LOT more to do with my opinion that listening to her stump is about as enjoyable as chewing on a wad of tinfoil.
I've explained in another thread (which shouldn't be that hard for you to find) exactly why I'm an Obama partisan, though I didn't explicitly describe myself as such within. I've laid out why Obama partisans tend to intractably be what they are.
Regardless of who I happen to support, or why, your supposition re: caucuses is now officially worthy of of the monicker, "canard".
Really. The time to piss and moan about caucuses, and whatever advantage they gave or took from a particular candidate, was last year, BEFORE it became apparent that they may have favored one candidate or the other. That bus left the station on January 1st.
Your talking points are well past their sell-by date. I'm not buying them. Most of them stank in the first place.
Back to my riddle: I know exactly and precisely why I'm an Obama partisan. I laid out my rationale
in here.
Can you articuate exactly and precisely why you support HRC? And why Obama is so bad in comparison?
I don't happen to think he ranks among luminaries like Jesus Christ (Despite HRC supporter accusations), but please tell the rest of us why we shouldn't look upon your favored candidate in a light similar to that of Richard Nixon or Joe Lieberman at this point.