As much as some of you may recoil in horror at stuff like Daily KOS diaries, realize that many folks there are authorities when it comes to Dem party mechanics.
It would seem that a MI Caucus would be a CINO (Caucus In Name Only).
It's anonymous.
It's not held at 7 in the evening.
Mail-in votes are a distinct possibility, as are online votes.
At least that's what I can gather, after sorting through the partisan chaff.
http://www.dailykos.com/storyo...181841/8676/104/470777
Personally I wouldn't object to something like that.
Florida also needs a do-over IMO.
Rationale - Candidates didn't campaign there, and FL should be allowed to hear each side's sales pitch. Clinton has brand recognition, but Obama should be allowed the opportunity to tell FL voters why he thinks he's better. Clinton should be allowed the opportunity to tell FL voters why the established brand of Donkey is the one to stick with. They can then make their decision based upon whatever merits they do or do not see.
Dems *did* turn out in record droves for that potemkin primary (note that there was also a property tax proposal on the ballot that evening), but I'll maintain the assertion that "underdog" candidates didn't get the opportunity to make their case to FL voters beforehand.
I'm an Obama guy, but you can hardly dispute that HRC came into FL as a known quantity, while the other candidates did not, and should have been afforded the opportunity to make their sales pitch to the voters.
I think the best candidate (in the eyes of FL voters) should win - FWIW, I think Obama would still lose FL in the popular vote.
But I think MI might be another story.