Michigan certifies Trump election victory

Toggle sidebar Toggle sidebar
boomerang

boomerang

Lifer
Jun 19, 2000
18,883
641
126
echo4747 said:
http://www.walkermn.com/around_the_...cle_424feca4-fba6-5688-9455-1a70f9a7349b.html

48 hrs now remain to file for recount
Click to expand...
There's nothing to be accomplished with a recount in Michigan. If Jill Stein wants to spend more of Soros' money and if the Board of Canvassers, or whomever makes such decisions wants to take it, the recount will happen but it's a waste of time. Pennsylvania isn't happening. But I'm all for recounts in Virginia, New Hampshire and California as well as one or two others but I don't think George wants to spend his dough there. He might not like the results.
 
JSt0rm

JSt0rm

Lifer
Sep 5, 2000
27,399
3,948
126
just let people recount. Its better for trump anyhow as it kills the idea that it was anymore then angry hillbillies.
 
B

brycejones

Lifer
Oct 18, 2005
30,283
31,316
136
Sheesh all the whining about recounts. If allowed by statute and the legal process is followed why bitch and moan about it.

Personally I don't expect them to alter the election outcome and believe they are a waste of time but some here seem to very butt hurt by the very concept of them even happening.
 
Londo_Jowo

Londo_Jowo

Lifer
Jan 31, 2010
17,303
158
106
londojowo.hypermart.net
I suspect if someone actually had proof that the votes had been hacked or tampered with most would agree recounts should happen. No proof exists, it's just butthurt dems trying to prevent Trump from receiving 270+ EC votes on 12/13 due to just the 3 states that put him over the top being recounted.
 
JSt0rm

JSt0rm

Lifer
Sep 5, 2000
27,399
3,948
126
Londo_Jowo said:
I suspect if someone actually had proof that the votes had been hacked or tampered with most would agree recounts should happen. No proof exists, it's just butthurt dems trying to prevent Trump from receiving 270+ EC votes on 12/13 due to just the 3 states that put him over the top being recounted.
Click to expand...


How would you have proof without doing a recount?
 
C

cubby1223

Lifer
May 24, 2004
13,518
42
86
JSt0rm said:
just let people recount. Its better for trump anyhow as it kills the idea that it was anymore then angry hillbillies.
Click to expand...
It's convenient that the thousands of state workers who would be involved in a recount, and all the judges in all the districts examining the recount and hearing legal challenges, are all sitting idle with nothing more important to consume their time with.
 
JSt0rm

JSt0rm

Lifer
Sep 5, 2000
27,399
3,948
126
cubby1223 said:
It's convenient that the thousands of state workers who would be involved in a recount, and all the judges in all the districts examining the recount and hearing legal challenges, are all sitting idle with nothing more important to consume their time with.
Click to expand...

And that's why it costs money.
 
Vic

Vic

Elite Member
Jun 12, 2001
50,422
14,337
136
Londo_Jowo said:
I suspect if someone actually had proof that the votes had been hacked or tampered with most would agree recounts should happen. No proof exists, it's just butthurt dems trying to prevent Trump from receiving 270+ EC votes on 12/13 due to just the 3 states that put him over the top being recounted.
Click to expand...
Trump was the one who claimed that the election would be rigged. So because he won, it's everyone else's responsibility to see if he was right or not.
 
buckshot24

buckshot24

Diamond Member
Nov 3, 2009
9,916
85
91
Vic said:
Trump was the one who claimed that the election would be rigged. So because he won, it's everyone else's responsibility to see if he was right or not.
Click to expand...
Did he say the "election" would be rigged? I remember him talking about the "system" being rigged.
 
Vic

Vic

Elite Member
Jun 12, 2001
50,422
14,337
136
buckshot24 said:
There is a huge difference, but hack away.
Click to expand...
There is no difference. What's good for the goose is good for the gander. In an alternate universe, Trump would have demanded a recount under threat of violence. In this universe, things have proceeded more peacefully thus far.
 
B

brycejones

Lifer
Oct 18, 2005
30,283
31,316
136
Vic said:
There is no difference. What's good for the goose is good for the gander. In an alternate universe, Trump would have demanded a recount under threat of violence. In this universe, things have proceeded more peacefully thus far.
Click to expand...

Those 2nd amendment people could have done something about it.
 
buckshot24

buckshot24

Diamond Member
Nov 3, 2009
9,916
85
91
Vic said:
There is no difference. What's good for the goose is good for the gander. In an alternate universe, Trump would have demanded a recount under threat of violence. In this universe, things have proceeded more peacefully thus far.
Click to expand...
All you had to do is listen to Trump for 5 minutes and it would have become clear and you have no idea if Trump would have done that..
 
Brainonska511

Brainonska511

Lifer
Dec 10, 2005
29,614
15,171
136
brycejones said:
Those 2nd amendment people could have done something about it.
Click to expand...
Only if Clinton was the winner.

werepossum said:
You guys enjoy your recount, but please understand one thing. If we see the left steal this election, the right will come out in force. Even people like myself, who will never vote for Trump, will come out. And it won't be burning police cars and American flags, vandalism of "enemy" buildings, and looting stores. It will be civil war, preventing Hillary's ascension by armed force. You will not do to the nation what you did in Minnesota.
Click to expand...
 
B

Balt

Lifer
Mar 12, 2000
12,673
482
126
Excellent! Now Michigan can take pride in its partial ownership of the next four years of our country's progress.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

COMPANY
RESOURCES
FOLLOW
Top Bottom