Michele Obama vs. API...........................

T2T IIIa

Junior Member
Oct 21, 2008
6
0
0
I'm just waiting for this tape to get released. Apparently, she slammed into them big time.

Making popcorn now ... awaiting the fireworks! :)

---

Thanks for trolling.

Harvey
Senior AT Mod
 

techs

Lifer
Sep 26, 2000
28,559
4
0
From their website:

I?m voting Democrat because I believe the government will do a better job of spending my money than I would!

You fail no matter what username you try and hide under.
 

Taejin

Moderator<br>Love & Relationships
Aug 29, 2004
3,270
0
0
I'm seeing reports that the interview was conducted by phone and could be fake?
 

yllus

Elite Member & Lifer
Aug 20, 2000
20,577
432
126
The Corner on National Review Online - That Michelle Obama Report

I'm sure a lot of you have seen references this morning to statements allegedly made by Michelle Obama in an interview with an organization called African Press International. I just asked the Obama campaign whether Michelle Obama did in fact speak to that organization, and spokesman Tommy Vietor answered:

The answer is no, it's not real, the report is made up. She did not speak to the organization.

Why anyone would take a "news organization" whose website is a WordPress blog is beyond me anyways.
 

T2T IIIa

Junior Member
Oct 21, 2008
6
0
0
Originally posted by: Moonbeam
Her name isn't on my ballot.

True. However, I think I'd seriously take all of this into consideration. Look back a few years when Clinton was in the White House? Yes, Bill was the president, but Hillary had her share of input.
 

midway

Senior member
Oct 22, 2004
301
0
0
This has been debunked multiple times already. T2T III is either a crappy troll or just a complete moron.
 

T2T III

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
12,899
1
0
Originally posted by: midway
This has been debunked multiple times already. T2T III is either a crappy troll or just a complete moron.

I find it kind of ironic how the liberal views here usually result in a few varied responses - and many of them are the same.

1) Either a person is a troll, or

2) The poster is a complete moron.

Do cheap attacks make the liberal crowd seem more superior?
 

techs

Lifer
Sep 26, 2000
28,559
4
0
Originally posted by: midway
This has been debunked multiple times already. T2T III is either a crappy troll or just a complete moron.
Yeah, there are many versions of the story but the gist is that Michelled Obama had a converstation with someone at API or possibly a CIA agent and cursed at American white people, called for death to American white people, etc.
It is really just the most disgusting anonymous email put up on a website by crazy people.

 
Feb 6, 2007
16,432
1
81
Originally posted by: T2T III
Originally posted by: midway
This has been debunked multiple times already. T2T III is either a crappy troll or just a complete moron.

I find it kind of ironic how the liberal views here usually result in a few varied responses - and many of them are the same.

1) Either a person is a troll, or

2) The poster is a complete moron.

Do cheap attacks make the liberal crowd seem more superior?

Well, if you cite a debunked source as fact and continue to argue in support of said source even after it's been proven false, you're either trolling or a moron. It's not a liberal/conservative thing, it's common sense. If I went around defending a website that said John McCain fathered an illegitimate black child, am I trolling, a moron, or a reasonable poster trying to have an honest discussion?
 

UberNeuman

Lifer
Nov 4, 1999
16,937
3,087
126
Originally posted by: Atomic Playboy
Originally posted by: T2T III
Originally posted by: midway
This has been debunked multiple times already. T2T III is either a crappy troll or just a complete moron.

I find it kind of ironic how the liberal views here usually result in a few varied responses - and many of them are the same.

1) Either a person is a troll, or

2) The poster is a complete moron.

Do cheap attacks make the liberal crowd seem more superior?

Well, if you cite a debunked source as fact and continue to argue in support of said source even after it's been proven false, you're either trolling or a moron. It's not a liberal/conservative thing, it's common sense. If I went around defending a website that said John McCain fathered an illegitimate black child, am I trolling, a moron, or a reasonable poster trying to have an honest discussion?

T2T III - welcome to it.