E + S <> ES <> E + P
Km = (Kforward + Kcat) / Kreverse
(assuming Kcat is << 1)
Km = Kforward / Kreverse
I've gone through the equation, and can see how a high or low value of Km affects the value for V0, but when I look at the equation at the top (E + S <> ES <> E + P), I just don't see how having Kreverse being larger than Kforward implies that the enzyme has a greater affinity for the substrate.
To me, having Kreverse being >>> than Kforward (and thus a really small Km), the equation is saying that the reaction favors being in the E + S form, and basically tells me that the enzyme wants absolutely nothing to do with the substrate. It wants to get as far away from the substrate as possible.
Since I'm pretty sure Michaelis and Menten are correct, what am I not understanding?
Km = (Kforward + Kcat) / Kreverse
(assuming Kcat is << 1)
Km = Kforward / Kreverse
I've gone through the equation, and can see how a high or low value of Km affects the value for V0, but when I look at the equation at the top (E + S <> ES <> E + P), I just don't see how having Kreverse being larger than Kforward implies that the enzyme has a greater affinity for the substrate.
To me, having Kreverse being >>> than Kforward (and thus a really small Km), the equation is saying that the reaction favors being in the E + S form, and basically tells me that the enzyme wants absolutely nothing to do with the substrate. It wants to get as far away from the substrate as possible.
Since I'm pretty sure Michaelis and Menten are correct, what am I not understanding?
