Originally posted by: kamaboko
So what do you think?
Originally posted by: Harvey
Jacko is Whacko! :|
No middle age guy with any functional brain cells can justify a passion for sleeping naked with young boys, spiking 'em with booze ans showing them homoerotic porn, let alone try to convince the rest of the planet that it's strictly innocent. :roll:
The guy's just freaking sick, and he needs to be kept away from kids.
Originally posted by: conjur
<---- doesn't give a sh*t
I can't believe our media continues to cover these meaningless cases like a circus.
From his own admissions on the "explanation" tape he produced and introduced into evidence. From the court recorded testimony of other witnesses who stated unequivocally that they had witnessed him giving alcohol to severl minors. These are more than accusations. They are in the public record.Originally posted by: Glpster
Where do you get any of THAT! Accusations do not make for reality.
Originally posted by: 1EZduzit
Jackson must be a Repug, because he's either stupid or a liar.
Originally posted by: Harvey
From his own admissions on the "explanation" tape he produced and introduced into evidence. From the court recorded testimony of other witnesses who stated unequivocally that they had witnessed him giving alcohol to severl minors. These are more than accusations. They are in the public record.Originally posted by: Glpster
Where do you get any of THAT! Accusations do not make for reality.
When you're dealing with a sick mind, it doesn't have to make sense to be true. It just has to be true to convict him, and the evidence is very strong that he's had a pattern of such behavior for years.
I don't wish him any harm, and with any luck, he'll get some psych help. The fact is, he's a danger to children and should be recognized as such.
If it weren't for the high profile media coverage and MJ's money and fame, this would be just another back page piece of garbage, and the only important issue would be whether he molested the kids.Originally posted by: Glpster
What HISTORY are you talking about?
Originally posted by: cwjerome
My gut instinct says he MAY not be guilty of molestation... of course I don't know for sure. He's nuts, and his "handlers" are sometimes shady which has hurt him also, but I think he does have an fairly "innocent" yet deranged Peter Pan thing going.
However, I think the jury will definately come back guilty on the serving liquor to children and PROBABLY guilty of the molestation. I think so much comes to to sympathy... OJ = sympathetic, Scott Peterson = unsympathetic, Michale Jackson = unsympathetic because besides being late several times to court and wearing pajamas, he comes across as a weirdo and the jury just won't relate.