• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Miata vs. Solstice

M

MikeMike

Lifer
Pic
here
2
3
4
5 (i dont know any info on the dude as in how tall, how fat, or what, so you cant really judge the height of the car)

i think it looks damn good, although the rear overhang is strange.

but other than that, i think it looks better than the miate (paint job not included in that comparison)
 
vette conv. > s2000 > 350z conv. > miata > solstice


solstice -

Engine Type Gas 4-cyl

Displacement 2.4L/- TBD -

SAE Net Horsepower @ RPM 177 @ 6600

SAE Net Torque @ RPM 166 @ 4800

 
The Sky and the Solstice are basically the same car. I'd wait a year or so for the forced induction solstice. I have heard it will probably be supercharged rather than turbo'd.
 
Originally posted by: dmw16
The Sky and the Solstice are basically the same car. I'd wait a year or so for the forced induction solstice. I have heard it will probably be supercharged rather than turbo'd.
Click to expand...

except for the fact the that solstice is fugly and the sky is sexy.
 
Originally posted by: jspeicher
vette conv. > s2000 > 350z conv. > miata > solstice


solstice -

Engine Type Gas 4-cyl

Displacement 2.4L/- TBD -

SAE Net Horsepower @ RPM 177 @ 6600

SAE Net Torque @ RPM 166 @ 4800
Click to expand...

I don't understand what you are getting at. A Vette is 2.5x as expensive as the Solstice. The 350Z and S2000 are both about 75% more expensive. The Miata is the only direct competitor.

And the Solstice is 200 pounds lighter, puts out more power and more torque at lower, more useable RPM's than the Miata.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top