• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Mexican Drug Cartels and IRS Audits

beer

Lifer
Spun off of this thread, http://forums.anandtech.com/messageview...atid=52&threadid=1544909&enterthread=y, where Dallas has the worst murder rate in any large city for six years now, and San Antonio and Houston round out the top 4 (along with Phoenix).

It would seem to be, that the drug cartels are very involved in this number being as large as it is. Without taking too many resources and being too invasive, why couldn't the government do the following -

1) Look at the cars an individual has registered with the Department of Public Safety (we don't have a DMV in Texas)
2) Look at tax returns and see the amount of income disclosed

A normal, sensible person would spend, what, 20% of their post-tax income on a car? So, why couldn't a program pull these two databases and flag anyone that has a car worth more than say, double that? I.e, someone 'buys' a $45K escalade, but works as a cashier at a deli - this happens all the damn time, why doesn't the government pul lthem in?

Is it to invasive? Maybe. But that thread clearly indicated that San Antonio/Houston/dallas/Phoenix are the most murderous cities in the nation - and for many years now - doesn't this seem like a real, real easy idea to start questioning people?
 
that would be some sort of profiling? I know people that spend 80% of their post tax income on a car.
 
Originally posted by: fs5
that would be some sort of profiling? I know people that spend 80% of their post tax income on a car.

How is it profiling if it is done by looking at two things, money taken in and money spent on one purchase, and using that as a starting point to break down obvious cases of illegitimate income?
 
Why don't we just require DEA, IRS, and FBI agents to be stationed in every home then. In the morning before going out, and at night before going to bed, you can drop your drawers for a three-way gov't-sanctioned official body-cavity inspection search. I mean, you want "security" - you got it! All you have to do is bend over, and give up all your rights... right?

:thumbsdown:

Or maybe, one should choose their living locations carefully, try to get to know their neighbors and neighborhood, and make their own living communities stronger. I've lived in places where we actually literally never locked our doors. I know, kind of unheard of in this day and age, but it was sort of a mutual community trust thing.

I will admit though, that's made about exponentially more difficult, when you have those living in your community, that don't share your same values, and don't even speak your language.
 
The US should just put pressure on Mexico. But we wont because Bush seems to be buddy buddy with Fox.

Personally I think there SHOULD be a harsher travel advisory issued, for those travelling to Mexico, after the amount of americans kiddnapped and killed in Mexico within the past year. I mean 2 confirmed dead and 19 missing and assumed dead. We issue travel advisories on middle eastern countries for far less.

The US Govt should put military on the boarder and shut it down until Mexico starts cooperating on this and other issues. Mexico violates treaties with the US left and right, but the US over looks it. Then Mexico has the gall to sue the US in US court of illegal aliens dieing and the US sentencing mexican nationals to death.

Yeah yeah yeah Mexico claims its doing sh!t, but most of the drug cartels are former Mexican Army members, and corruption is all over in the Mexican police, Military and Government.
 
WTF? Uhh.. No?

Innocent until proven guilty. Period.

Do I need to say it again? INNOCENT until PROVEN guilty. Do you understand what those words mean?
 
Originally posted by: VirtualLarry
Why don't we just require DEA, IRS, and FBI agents to be stationed in every home then. In the morning before going out, and at night before going to bed, you can drop your drawers for a three-way gov't-sanctioned official body-cavity inspection search. I mean, you want "security" - you got it! All you have to do is bend over, and give up all your rights... right?

:thumbsdown:

No - wrong. The government already has these two documents on file. It does not require a massive invasion that is appearant to you - it is a transparent process and simply another way to track illegitimate income, done so in such a way that it targets thug/drug-dealing culture that is linked in a lot of ways to attention-whoring the cars they drive. There is not merely a coincidence that the worst murder rates are close to the border.
 
Originally posted by: Eli
WTF? Uhh.. No?

Innocent until proven guilty. Period.

Do I need to say it again? INNOCENT until PROVEN guilty. Do you understand what those words mean?

The IRS already audits you for similar reasons to I propose - owning too big of a house, for example. You are not being charged with anything when you come in for an IRS audit. What I propose is a logical extension of that, linked instead to state records as well.
 
Originally posted by: beer
Spun off of this thread, http://forums.anandtech.com/messageview...atid=52&threadid=1544909&enterthread=y, where Dallas has the worst murder rate in any large city for six years now, and San Antonio and Houston round out the top 4 (along with Phoenix).

It would seem to be, that the drug cartels are very involved in this number being as large as it is. Without taking too many resources and being too invasive, why couldn't the government do the following -

1) Look at the cars an individual has registered with the Department of Public Safety (we don't have a DMV in Texas)
2) Look at tax returns and see the amount of income disclosed

A normal, sensible person would spend, what, 20% of their post-tax income on a car? So, why couldn't a program pull these two databases and flag anyone that has a car worth more than say, double that? I.e, someone 'buys' a $45K escalade, but works as a cashier at a deli - this happens all the damn time, why doesn't the government pul lthem in?

Is it to invasive? Maybe. But that thread clearly indicated that San Antonio/Houston/dallas/Phoenix are the most murderous cities in the nation - and for many years now - doesn't this seem like a real, real easy idea to start questioning people?


Well, if its known that those are the things they look for, then any smart criminal would simply avoid it. All else deserve to be arrested anyway.
 
Originally posted by: Eli
WTF? Uhh.. No?

Innocent until proven guilty. Period.

Do I need to say it again? INNOCENT until PROVEN guilty. Do you understand what those words mean?

Do YOU understand the difference between INVESTIGATION and CONVICTION?
 
Originally posted by: beer
Originally posted by: Eli
WTF? Uhh.. No?

Innocent until proven guilty. Period.

Do I need to say it again? INNOCENT until PROVEN guilty. Do you understand what those words mean?

The IRS already audits you for similar reasons to I propose - owning too big of a house, for example. You are not being charged with anything when you come in for an IRS audit. What I propose is a logical extension of that, linked instead to state records as well.
Yeah, that's true. And actually, buying cars when your income doesen't support it can trigger an audit too... It's just that even audits are somewhat random. They don't check EVERY one.

I dunno, this is a huge grey area... but to me it seems to be just another way to erode our right to privacy.
 
Originally posted by: Eli
WTF? Uhh.. No?

Innocent until proven guilty. Period.

Do I need to say it again? INNOCENT until PROVEN guilty. Do you understand what those words mean?

No one is suggesting conviction based off such info, merely a flag that says "Something isn't right here."

IMO it's on the same lines as checking out those who suddenly start drawing 20x their normal power consumption (hello pretty garden in the basement).

There's nothing wrong with connecting the dots as long as it's info they already had.

If buying a nice vehicle suddently becomes grounds to tap your phone, then I'd have issues.

Viper GTS
 
I used to work at a computer store and one of my coworkers drove either a corvette or an escalade to work every day that were both his. He made $9/hour.
 
Originally posted by: tk149
Originally posted by: Eli
WTF? Uhh.. No?

Innocent until proven guilty. Period.

Do I need to say it again? INNOCENT until PROVEN guilty. Do you understand what those words mean?

Do YOU understand the difference between INVESTIGATION and CONVICTION?
Certainly.

But you have to have evidence that something is being done wrong to start the investigation in the first place.

Shrug. Like I said, grey area.......

 
Originally posted by: Viper GTS
Originally posted by: Eli
WTF? Uhh.. No?

Innocent until proven guilty. Period.

Do I need to say it again? INNOCENT until PROVEN guilty. Do you understand what those words mean?

No one is suggesting conviction based off such info, merely a flag that says "Something isn't right here."

IMO it's on the same lines as checking out those who suddenly start drawing 20x their normal power consumption (hello pretty garden in the basement).

There's nothing wrong with connecting the dots as long as it's info they already had.

If buying a nice vehicle suddently becomes grounds to tap your phone, then I'd have issues.

Viper GTS
That's just the thing, they DO NOT do that. For all they know, you've just bought a welder and you're working on a project.

Our electricity usage spiked 600kWh from normal last month because we were using a couple of 500W halogen lights while working on our cars a lot at night.

The utility companies are in no way tied in with the local PD. They are a business. As long as you're paying them for what you use, what do they care?

This is exactly what I mean. The VERY first thing that happens, is that someone calls in a tip. Somehow, the local PD has to be tipped off.

They can't just run and grab your electric bill at that point, though. They may then bring a drug dog into the area. If he alerts them to the presence of drugs, THEN they have enough evidence to subpeona your utility records.

They don't just look at it by itself, they compare it to all your neighbors. If your bill is significantly higher, they investigate further- could it be that they have electric heat, etc, etc.

If after they've checked all that out, it is abnormal, they probably have enough to get a warrant and bust your ass.

But it still all boils down to that one action, an informant. They do not just meddle in everybodys privacy automatically....

Edit: I realize this analogy doesen't really go together well with the IRS, but it was your analogy to begin with. 😉

That's why the federal government doesen't run *everything*. How could you ever trust them to check and balance themselves?

It's just that tax evasion is a serious crime, so I guess they have that authority.

Using electricity in any quantity is not a crime.
 
Originally posted by: Eli
Originally posted by: beer
Originally posted by: Eli
WTF? Uhh.. No?

Innocent until proven guilty. Period.

Do I need to say it again? INNOCENT until PROVEN guilty. Do you understand what those words mean?

The IRS already audits you for similar reasons to I propose - owning too big of a house, for example. You are not being charged with anything when you come in for an IRS audit. What I propose is a logical extension of that, linked instead to state records as well.
Yeah, that's true. And actually, buying cars when your income doesen't support it can trigger an audit too... It's just that even audits are somewhat random. They don't check EVERY one.

I dunno, this is a huge grey area... but to me it seems to be just another way to erode our right to privacy.

Now, I agree with you. But consider this - the fundamental duty of any government, regardless of how libertarian you are, is to protect it's citizens. This is not an invasive method, when drug cartels are responsible for a lot of the convicted murders in Dallas. And yet, I don't think anyone will deny a correlation that most drug dealers tend to live overly elaborate lifestyles. Their disclosed income does not support that lifestyle. Typing it to state vehicle records could crack down on this.

Well, if its known that those are the things they look for, then any smart criminal would simply avoid it. All else deserve to be arrested anyway.

That isn't necessarily true; in south dallas you can see hookers on the service roads as you are driving down the interstate. They still continue. People are busted for tax evasion all the time - not as frequently as they should, but it happens. Most people just hope they will slip under the radar.

I used to work at a computer store and one of my coworkers drove either a corvette or an escalade to work every day that were both his. He made $9/hour.

At $9 an hour, with a takehome pay closer ot $7 after all taxes, do you know how long it would take to own $100K worth of cars on that salary? I rest my case - he either has family money that is being diclosed, or he's involved in illegal stuff. That SHOULD raise a flag, IMO.
 
Man, you're jealous 'cause the chicos are pimping in their hawt wheels picking up hawt chicks while you're driving in your busted beater. If the government don't give a fvck as long as they get their cut in taxes, why should you?

Ever heard of saving money? Just 'cause you splurge all your "hard earn" money on video games and A/V stuff don't mean everybody else's doing the same.
 
Originally posted by: Baked
Man, you're jealous 'cause the chicos are pimping in their hawt wheels picking up hawt chicks while you're driving in your busted beater. If the government don't give a fvck as long as they get their cut in taxes, why should you?

Ever heard of saving money? Just 'cause you splurge all your "hard earn" money on video games and A/V stuff don't mean everybody else's doing the same.

What the fsck? I haven't played video games in years. I still have a 25" TV, because I never watch anything.

The whole point is that the government isn't getting their money. That is why it's tax fraud, and an audit would do something about that. And I hope you're being sarcastic - I would assume that someone who spends 75% of hteir post-tax money on a car is not exactly doing 'saving' - someone who spends 15% would typically be, um, saving?
 
Originally posted by: Eli
WTF? Uhh.. No?
Innocent until proven guilty. Period.
Do I need to say it again? INNOCENT until PROVEN guilty. Do you understand what those words mean?
Sheeple don't understand. They just want "security" given to them, without them having to exercise any responsibility on their own. It's sad too, because most of them don't even realize that themselves - because when they do, they buy a gun and start to take some responsibility themselves, and stop being sheeple.
 
Originally posted by: beer
The IRS already audits you for similar reasons to I propose - owning too big of a house, for example.
WTF? In a country that (supposedly) offers both freedom, and the legal ability to own property, who the fsck is the gov't to say "how big" of a house one is allowed to legally own?
It's like the BS laws that allow LEOs to confiscate money off of someone's person, or lock them up for not having enough money on their person, under the presumed belief (of guilt before innocence!) that one is either a drug-dealer, or homeless, respectively.

I'm not saying that drug-dealing isn't or shouldn't be a crime, nor should actual, legitimate, crimes not be investigated - but they should simply be done in such a manner to respect other citizen's legal rights. There's a reason why we have this legal system that we do. If the cops are going to act like outlaws, and not respect citizen's rights, then the citizens will also start to act like outlaws, and not respect the authority of law. Once that happens, society will likely devolve into chaos.

Is that what you would be happy with? I wouldn't.
 
Originally posted by: Viper GTS
Originally posted by: Eli
WTF? Uhh.. No?

Innocent until proven guilty. Period.

Do I need to say it again? INNOCENT until PROVEN guilty. Do you understand what those words mean?

No one is suggesting conviction based off such info, merely a flag that says "Something isn't right here."

IMO it's on the same lines as checking out those who suddenly start drawing 20x their normal power consumption (hello pretty garden in the basement).

There's nothing wrong with connecting the dots as long as it's info they already had.

If buying a nice vehicle suddently becomes grounds to tap your phone, then I'd have issues.

Viper GTS


Funny there was a case where I live where the cops went into a house thinking it was a drug house. Their basis for this was that a neighbor complained of noise late at night and strange comings and goings at all hours. So cops staked the place out and saw the home owner throwing out his garbage just as the garbage truck pulled up on his street. and then they brought a drug sniffing dog in to check the parameter of the house but it came up with nothing. The cops suspected it was a meth lab because drug dealers usually have people in and out of the house at all hours and they throw their trash away at the last second because they don't want people/cops looking in their trash as sits outside their house overnight. So the cops decided to do a raid on the place and they came in full force, they busted down the front door and searched the house and found nothing. It turns out the guy had a party the night the neighbor complained and he said he just forgot to put out the garbage the day they staked him out, he heard the truck coming up his street so he rushed out to put out the trash. Now the guy is screwed because he's a renter and the cops won't pay for the damage to his rental house for the front door misc damage done by having 20 cops raid through his house.

Now back to the point. I think checking a persons car to income to decide if they're a drug dealer is retarded. What about all those kids who have their parents buy them cars when their in high school/ college. I know a bunch of 18-22 year olds driving paid off 30k BMW/Lexus's/Acura and making either 0 income or less than 30k.
 
Originally posted by: tk149
Do YOU understand the difference between INVESTIGATION and CONVICTION?

Originally posted by: Viper GTS
If buying a nice vehicle suddently becomes grounds to tap your phone, then I'd have issues.
You guys do realize, that if someone is considered to be "under investigation", then LEO can now tap your phones, and even your friends and family member's phones, without a warrant, I believe. You can also seemingly be "under investigation" for a virtually indefinate amount of time, as there is nothing similar (that I am aware of) like the "Writ of Habeus Corpus" in order to obtain freedom from detention if there are no legal charges being pressed. Meanwhile, you feel constantly harassed as LEO follows you everywhere.

So yes, ViperGTS, this would likely allow that.
Originally posted by: Eli
That's just the thing, they DO NOT do that. For all they know, you've just bought a welder and you're working on a project.

Our electricity usage spiked 600kWh from normal last month because we were using a couple of 500W halogen lights while working on our cars a lot at night.

The utility companies are in no way tied in with the local PD. They are a business. As long as you're paying them for what you use, what do they care?
But as corporations merge, both amongst themselves (aggregate corporate monopoly of an entire industry), as well as intermingled with gov't, along the same lines as "know your customer" banking guidelines and laws, then that will also happen. In fact, all companies that hire people, copies of those job application records are all sent off to some gov't dept., where they are fed into a computer system looking for anomolies and correlations. I wouldn't be too surprised if, in the future, all of a citizen's interactions with all (corporate, at least) private parties, are all monitored by those corporations, in conjunction and as a favor to LEO. Of course the corporations in question would also get some quid-pro-quo arrangements from the gov't for their "voluntary participation" in such schemes as well.

What will eventually happen, is LEO is no longer enforcing the actual laws, but in fact, "patterns of normalcy", and eventually everyone that "doesn't fit the mold", will be driven out of the country, or locked up permanently, or killed. Things like "profiling", in the "interests of security" are already the first step in that direction.

If you thought that a certain political party in Germany was "ruthless and efficient" - how are today's corporations any different, really? And if they gain control over the gov't, what will likely happen?

Heck, I got hassled by the local cops walking home from HS, just because I had long hair. I was like, "WTF?" I was actually far more "law-abiding" and "decent" than half of the clean-cut, richy-rich kids that I went to school with, that actually did so many crazy and potentially law-breaking things, like underage drinking and whatnot. Sure, if you were to judge me purely on looks, you probably wouldn't have known that, but I was actually "the good kid". Strange how I seem to be the one to be persecuted more often than not. The sad fact of life is, looks do matter, and everyone is judged more on appearance, subconciously, than on anything else. In life, love, jobs, legal issues - everything. It's a sad fact of life, and one of the grave downsides of the human race, one that is rarely if ever spoken of in a truely candid manner.
Originally posted by: Eli
This is exactly what I mean. The VERY first thing that happens, is that someone calls in a tip. Somehow, the local PD has to be tipped off.

They can't just run and grab your electric bill at that point, though. They may then bring a drug dog into the area. If he alerts them to the presence of drugs, THEN they have enough evidence to subpeona your utility records.

They don't just look at it by itself, they compare it to all your neighbors. If your bill is significantly higher, they investigate further- could it be that they have electric heat, etc, etc.

If after they've checked all that out, it is abnormal, they probably have enough to get a warrant and bust your ass.

But it still all boils down to that one action, an informant. They do not just meddle in everybodys privacy automatically....
Uhm, that kind of naively assumes that they don't, or at least won't, at some point, have a computer system "automatically scanning" things like utility bills, 24x7, looking for these sorts of things. The technology-impared courts might actually allow such things too, based on the argument that since a human is not directly doing the searching, then it's not a violation of "due process", even though in practice it really is. All the LEO agency has to do is claim that it might "improve catching terrorists", and they'll probably allow it. Kind of like those computer-vision camera scanning systems that were to be installed in some places, to "detect terrorists" or not.
Originally posted by: Eli
Using electricity in any quantity is not a crime.
"Living outside the lines" shouldn't be any more illegal than "painting outside the lines". It should be someone's personal choice how they live their lives, no matter how unusual their habits may be - so long as they don't actually violate the law and the rights of other citizens. Live and let live - don't make unnecessary and fascist/authoritarian judgements on others. That's how I think it should be.
 
Originally posted by: beer
Now, I agree with you. But consider this - the fundamental duty of any government, regardless of how libertarian you are, is to protect it's citizens.
No, actually, it's not.

It's job, is to collectively apply the will of the people, and to protect and enforce the rights of its citizens - all of them. (Hence why it is a Republic.)

It is not to "protect" the citizens, at least not where such protection would infringe the rights of the same or other citizens.

Originally posted by: beer
This is not an invasive method, when drug cartels are responsible for a lot of the convicted murders in Dallas. And yet, I don't think anyone will deny a correlation that most drug dealers tend to live overly elaborate lifestyles. Their disclosed income does not support that lifestyle. Typing it to state vehicle records could crack down on this.
Are you the same sort of person, that feels that "blacks" are responsible for the majority of crimes in any one area, and thus that justifies LEO actions based on "profiling"?

Because it sounds like the same sorts of arguments to me.
Originally posted by: beer
That isn't necessarily true; in south dallas you can see hookers on the service roads as you are driving down the interstate. They still continue.
So why don't the cops deal with that? Obviously that wouldn't require any privacy-invading investigation techniques, if they are "working" in plain sight like that. Then again, I think that LEO generally goes easy on those sorts of people, unless there is a major complain made about it by the citizens in the area. At least that's how I understand the situation around here. I've seen a few that seemed... well, a bit too obvious, while driving through Boston sometimes. Actually, I wondered if they weren't actually undercover cops or something. Who knows. Never been close enough to ask one of them.
Originally posted by: beer
I used to work at a computer store and one of my coworkers drove either a corvette or an escalade to work every day that were both his. He made $9/hour.
At $9 an hour, with a takehome pay closer ot $7 after all taxes, do you know how long it would take to own $100K worth of cars on that salary? I rest my case - he either has family money that is being diclosed, or he's involved in illegal stuff. That SHOULD raise a flag, IMO.
I went to high school with someone, her dad bought her a brand-new Corvette when she was 18. Perhaps something similar happened there? That doesn't seem illegal, nor worthy of being placed under investigation for it.
 
Originally posted by: Baked
Man, you're jealous 'cause the chicos are pimping in their hawt wheels picking up hawt chicks while you're driving in your busted beater. If the government don't give a fvck as long as they get their cut in taxes, why should you?
LOL. Could be true.
Originally posted by: Baked
Ever heard of saving money? Just 'cause you splurge all your "hard earn" money on video games and A/V stuff don't mean everybody else's doing the same.
Yeah, I knew of a fellow, came to the US, worked hard, really hard, at the local fast-food places. (So, not much money/hour, but also some tips.) He was a cool guy, drove an old beater, but .. he had one *heck* of an A/V setup, huge TV, walls of DVD movies and video-games, etc. That's simply what he enjoyed, and what he chose to spend his hard-earned money on. I don't see anything wrong with that. If the gov't starts to mandate a "legal range" of vehicles that one can own, based on their salaries, and the "legal range" of televisions that they may possess, and the "legal range" of the number of DVD movies that they may own - fsck it, I'm out of here. That's a sure sign that the N***'s have come to power again.
 
Originally posted by: PKPunk
Funny there was a case where I live where the cops went into a house thinking it was a drug house. Their basis for this was that a neighbor complained of noise late at night and strange comings and goings at all hours. So cops staked the place out and saw the home owner throwing out his garbage just as the garbage truck pulled up on his street. and then they brought a drug sniffing dog in to check the parameter of the house but it came up with nothing. The cops suspected it was a meth lab because drug dealers usually have people in and out of the house at all hours and they throw their trash away at the last second because they don't want people/cops looking in their trash as sits outside their house overnight. So the cops decided to do a raid on the place and they came in full force, they busted down the front door and searched the house and found nothing. It turns out the guy had a party the night the neighbor complained and he said he just forgot to put out the garbage the day they staked him out, he heard the truck coming up his street so he rushed out to put out the trash. Now the guy is screwed because he's a renter and the cops won't pay for the damage to his rental house for the front door misc damage done by having 20 cops raid through his house.
I'm sorry, but that just seems oh-so-typical to me.

There was an incident, a few years back, in one of the "bad neighborhood" suburbs of Boston, some elderly priest, I think it was, lived there. Due to either bad information (false tip?), or just general LEO screwups, they decided to bust down his door in a surprise raid. Well, he was so shocked and scared, he had a heart attack and up and died.

🙁

I don't know about these kids today, nor the average person serving as an LEO, but when I went to HS, we had to read "To Kill a Mockingbird". I always thought that the title was kind of strange, before I read it, but it has a lot of important principles (especially about suspicion and prejudice), that I think should be required reading for new academy recruits.
Originally posted by: PKPunk
Now back to the point. I think checking a persons car to income to decide if they're a drug dealer is retarded. What about all those kids who have their parents buy them cars when their in high school/ college. I know a bunch of 18-22 year olds driving paid off 30k BMW/Lexus's/Acura and making either 0 income or less than 30k.
Exactly!
 
Back
Top