Mercury space probe runs out of fuel and crashes into planet

mmntech

Lifer
Sep 20, 2007
17,501
12
0
These probes are on a one-way trip. Without fuel, they can't maintain a stable orbit indefinitely.
 

Stopsignhank

Platinum Member
Mar 1, 2014
2,752
2,252
136
NASA says its Messenger space probe crashed into Mercury on Thursday after running out of fuel, ending a nearly 11-year journey that provided valuable data and thousands of photos. Mission controllers at the Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory (APL) in Laurel, Maryland, confirmed the probe slammed into the surface of Mercury, as anticipated, at 3:26 p.m. EDT, NASA told CNN in an email.
NASA earlier said the probe was expected to hit the surface at 8,750 miles per hour and to create an impact crater 52 feet (16 meters) in diameter.
The crash wasn't visible from Earth because it occurred on the far side of Mercury.
Messenger (an acronym for MErcury Surface, Space ENvironment, GEochemistry, and Ranging) was launched in 2004 and traveled more than 6½ years before it started circling Mercury on March 18, 2011.
It was the first spacecraft to orbit the planet closest to the sun. It traveled about 5 billion miles -- a journey that included 15 trips around the sun.

I think it is safe to say that they got their money's worth out of that mission.
 

HN

Diamond Member
Jan 19, 2001
8,186
4
0
I think it is safe to say that they got their money's worth out of that mission.

maybe it could have gotten more done if it didn't spend all its time on the internet tweeting :mad:

As the end neared, the probe sent back some final tweets thanking mission managers and counting down its final orbits.
 

gorcorps

aka Brandon
Jul 18, 2004
30,741
456
126
How the hell can something launched 11 years ago send tweets?

Don't bullshit me NASA
 

Ichinisan

Lifer
Oct 9, 2002
28,298
1,235
136
http://www.cnn.com/2015/04/30/us/nasa-mercury-messenger-space-probe-to-crash/index.html

wonder why this probe didn't have solar panels?

also, Mercury has ice?!
even on the dark side of the planet, I would never have imagined that it's cold enuf to form ice

Nothing we've ever deployed in space could propel itself with only energy. You need propellant to send one direction so that your craft is pushed the other direction. Newtonian physics.

Check the thread about "new type of space drive discovered." Scientists are investigating a phenomenon that *seems* to generate thrust with energy alone and no propellant. It's still possible they might find a fundamental flaw in testing, but we still don't know why thrust was measured.
 

Jeff7

Lifer
Jan 4, 2001
41,596
20
81
As the end neared, the probe sent back some final tweets sarcastically "thanking" mission managers and counting down its final orbits.
:hmm:



confirmed the probe slammed into the surface of Mercury, as anticipated



non-story
Shush. Just keep up the pretense that scientists and engineers are actually morons.




How the hell can something launched 11 years ago send tweets?

Don't bullshit me NASA
Relativity.
 

norseamd

Lifer
Dec 13, 2013
13,990
180
106
Then why does the fucking probe need constant fuel you fucking moron?

The mass and gravity of the moon is much greater than that of the probe hence the much greater orbital durations. And even when the Earth has quite a lot more mass and gravity than Mercury the difference between the moon and the probe is obviously so great that the differences between Earth and Mercury are minor in comparison.

Every time you slingshot a spacecraft off of a planetary satellite you are stealing some of their momentum. So basically every time we do this we are shortening the potential life of Earth until it falls into the Sun. However I am sure the Sun will blow up far earlier than when the orbit of Earth ever falls into the Sun.
 

Jeff7

Lifer
Jan 4, 2001
41,596
20
81
The mass and gravity of the moon is much greater than that of the probe hence the much greater orbital durations. And even when the Earth has quite a lot more mass and gravity than Mercury the difference between the moon and the probe is obviously so great that the differences between Earth and Mercury are minor in comparison.

Every time you slingshot a spacecraft off of a planetary satellite you are stealing some of their momentum. So basically every time we do this we are shortening the potential life of Earth until it falls into the Sun. However I am sure the Sun will blow up far earlier than when the orbit of Earth ever falls into the Sun.
I wonder how many Youtube or article comments will express angry concern that NASA smacked Mercury with a space probe, and since it's so close to the Sun, now it's going to get pushed in.


Pluto
Mercury
 

Red Squirrel

No Lifer
May 24, 2003
70,696
13,846
126
www.anyf.ca
Because physics. It is "orbitally falling" to Earth right now.

TIL.

As for how it sends tweets my guess is it sends data to a NASA server first, then they eventually made the program to put that data on twitter.

As for solar panels, I don't think there's a way to create propulsion in space using electricity. You could electrolyse water and make hydrogen but then you have to carry water and you'd run out of that too. Fuel is higher density.