- Jun 19, 2000
- 18,883
- 641
- 126
Not being argumentative but just how in the hell do you think we would accomplish that? The people that make the rules are the ones that can change the rules. There might be a few newcomers after every election willing, but they don't have the numbers. The longer they walk the halls of Congress, the less chance there is of any changes being made.If we eliminate lobbying in it's current form (bribes) and eliminate career politicians, it shouldn't be that difficult. Server in office would be similar to an extended jury duty: a public service, not a career path. I suppose then the question of money is solved, as making a few hundred thousand for 4 years and that's it ain't bad for most of the country. The country would be better represented (similar to a trial bu jury). The only issue is how much can someone get done in 4 years?
The longer an individual in Congress holds their seat the more masters they need to answer to. Anybody that thinks Harry Reid had an accident while exercising is very naive. These people are very unwilling to relinquish their power for a variety of reasons.
A Convention of States is the only way to take back control of our government. But as every month goes by, despite more and more states coming on board, the stronger the federal government gets.
