- Sep 3, 2003
- 1,043
- 0
- 0
they have skyrocketed? what happened? i was looking a pair of corsair 3200 128mb ram about 4 months ago and it was around 150. Now it's up to 215. What happened? A shortage or something?
Originally posted by: acebake
I'm not sure--I heard a rumor that it was because of the war, but you never know...
Originally posted by: mrwxyz
Originally posted by: acebake
I'm not sure--I heard a rumor that it was because of the war, but you never know...
yes, instability in iraq has led to fears of memory shortage since the country itself sits on beds of ddr deposits.
Originally posted by: Markfw900
I heard that a very large "batch" of memory was bad at a major memory mfg, and the shortage caused the price hike. Just rumor though.
Originally posted by: KillaKillaEdit: it could also be because americans are unwilling to accept more mermory efficient OSes, like linux, over their safer, bigger, and slower windows counterparts.
Originally posted by: n0cmonkey
Originally posted by: KillaKillaEdit: it could also be because americans are unwilling to accept more mermory efficient OSes, like linux, over their safer, bigger, and slower windows counterparts.
KDE, Gnome, XFCE, and other monstorous Desktop Environments sit much better on 512MB+ of ram than 256MB. Most people out there want big, not efficient.
Originally posted by: Schadenfroh
Originally posted by: n0cmonkey
Originally posted by: KillaKillaEdit: it could also be because americans are unwilling to accept more mermory efficient OSes, like linux, over their safer, bigger, and slower windows counterparts.
KDE, Gnome, XFCE, and other monstorous Desktop Environments sit much better on 512MB+ of ram than 256MB. Most people out there want big, not efficient.
command line man, command line interface all the way
Originally posted by: mrwxyz
Originally posted by: acebake
I'm not sure--I heard a rumor that it was because of the war, but you never know...
yes, instability in iraq has led to fears of memory shortage since the country itself sits on beds of ddr deposits.
the best reason i've heard is that since ddr2 is quite expensive compared to ddr, by raising ddr prices consumers will be more willing to accept ddr2 since it will be newer tech at relativly similar prices
Originally posted by: Swanny
Originally posted by: mrwxyz
Originally posted by: acebake
I'm not sure--I heard a rumor that it was because of the war, but you never know...
yes, instability in iraq has led to fears of memory shortage since the country itself sits on beds of ddr deposits.
the best reason i've heard is that since ddr2 is quite expensive compared to ddr, by raising ddr prices consumers will be more willing to accept ddr2 since it will be newer tech at relativly similar prices
Yes, and that idiot Bush won't release the nation's strategic DDR reserves to help curb prices!
*rides in on red white and blue elephant, stabs MRWXYZ with an unbelievably long DDR DIMM, leaves*Originally posted by: mrwxyz
Originally posted by: Swanny
Originally posted by: mrwxyz
Originally posted by: acebake
I'm not sure--I heard a rumor that it was because of the war, but you never know...
yes, instability in iraq has led to fears of memory shortage since the country itself sits on beds of ddr deposits.
the best reason i've heard is that since ddr2 is quite expensive compared to ddr, by raising ddr prices consumers will be more willing to accept ddr2 since it will be newer tech at relativly similar prices
Yes, and that idiot Bush won't release the nation's strategic DDR reserves to help curb prices!
the reserves are there in case the terrorists destroy the ddr in american counterterrorist equipment
Originally posted by: n0cmonkey
Originally posted by: KillaKillaEdit: it could also be because americans are unwilling to accept more mermory efficient OSes, like linux, over their safer, bigger, and slower windows counterparts.
KDE, Gnome, XFCE, and other monstorous Desktop Environments sit much better on 512MB+ of ram than 256MB. Most people out there want big, not efficient.