peonyu
Platinum Member
- Mar 12, 2003
- 2,038
- 23
- 81
did your 'jump to conclusions mat' give you that pearl of wisdom?
More like, "Hey guys I think I know everything and only my opinion matters, so if you disagree your a evil bad meeny" /end9yearoldmentality.
And btw, there is already evidence those recordings were edited. Ie-taken out of context, not credible, ie- your a huge fucking retard to believe everything you hear on the internet or from the media [/points at Sclamoz]. Which is what I was getting at in my posts anyway. She was WAY to calm for them to be perfectly legit, those conversations were obviously edited and taken out of context. That does not equal defending Mel Gibson, it just equals not believing everything you hear/having downsyndrome like Sclamoz does. Afterall, everyone has access to audio programs these days, even freeware apps can splice audio up to make it sound anyway you want it to. So if she called him every name in the book, broke his tv etc to piss him off, no one knows. We only have a edited audio recording to go on [which appears invalid, which makes his rant invalid].
http://www.tmz.com/2010/07/14/mel-g...spousal-abuse-investigation-tapes-admissible/
That does not mean I excuse his rants, his rant is vile. But what she said to him may have been equally vile...Which is why she is just as bad as he is, and both are not worth defending.
Last edited: