waggy
No Lifer
- Dec 14, 2000
- 68,145
- 10
- 81
Originally posted by: Syringer
Originally posted by: waggy
Originally posted by: Syringer
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
You also didn't see McNabb's team getting embarrassed in the SUper Bowl even though they played a team superior in every way to the Raiders opponent when they were in the SB.Originally posted by: shinerburke
Originally posted by: BlinderBomber
Originally posted by: shinerburke
As for QB...I'll take Rich Gannon over McNabb any day. Still would.
You're kidding, right? You forgot to include the wink or the smiley face or whatever, didn't you?
Nope. While Gannon may not be as physically gifted he is far better at managing a game and is a more intelligent QB than McNabb. You also didn't see Gannon sucking wind in the superbowl and throwing up in the huddle.
He also didn't have to play a team whose head coach was his own coach just a year prior and knew the playbook, audible signals, and his own tendencies better than his current coach. If the Raiders had played any other team with any other coach, it would've been a much different story..
Plus Gannon = 1 MVP, McNabb = 0
5 INT 3 ran back for TD's!
there is only so much you can blame on the coach knowing the playbook!
For sure, but you're at a huge disadvantage when you're going up against one of the most dominating defenses in league history, an opposing coach that pretty much knows what's going to happen before it does, and when your own head coach is so idiotic that he kept the same play calls and had to make changes at halftime. How is a QB supposed to deal with that?
In any case, McNabb threw for 3 INTs in his lone Super Bowl appearance.
very true.
more i think about it i would take either over REX!