According to some people, Saddam supports terrorism because he gives money to every palestinian family that has suffered in the conflict.
Now, using this perverse logic, I can conclude that McDonald's is also guilty of supporting terrorism. According to this article:
Since its inevitable that some terrorists will get treatment at this hospital or get help from the Red Crescent, McDonald's is no better than Saddam.
I do hope that those people will now stop using this sad excuse for an argument.
Now, using this perverse logic, I can conclude that McDonald's is also guilty of supporting terrorism. According to this article:
Saudi Arabia 2002
Problem: Arab anger at Israel's response to Palestinian uprising triggers boycott of American products.
McSpin: A Ramadan promotion by the Saudi franchise sends 30 cents from every Big Mac sold to the Red Crescent Society and Nasser Hospital in Gaza for treatment of Palestinian casualties.
Since its inevitable that some terrorists will get treatment at this hospital or get help from the Red Crescent, McDonald's is no better than Saddam.
I do hope that those people will now stop using this sad excuse for an argument.