McAfee vs Webroot

NewYorksFinest

Senior member
Mar 27, 2014
455
1
0
I have a Webroot 1 year subscription which I bought for $29.99. I have a McAfee 2014 Plus which is lifetime which I bought off of Amazon for $14.99. Which should I use?
 

corkyg

Elite Member | Peripherals
Super Moderator
Mar 4, 2000
27,370
239
106
Since you already have both, my choice would be to use Webroot for the paid year, and then, possibly switch to lifetime McAfee. That way you get value from both payments. :)

Money aside, I would prefer Webroot to McAfee functionally.
 
Last edited:

justin4pack

Senior member
Jan 21, 2012
521
6
81
Neither, both offer more problems then they are worth. It tells u something if the program requires its own removal tool because of how crappy the program is. I prefer malwarebytes.
 

lxskllr

No Lifer
Nov 30, 2004
59,098
9,533
126
I wouldn't use McAfee if you paid me. I have no opinion on Webroot, but I don't buy security software. I have other things to spend money on.
 

PliotronX

Diamond Member
Oct 17, 1999
8,883
107
106
I cannot count how many systems I have had to clean up that were declared secure by McRapee.
 

corkyg

Elite Member | Peripherals
Super Moderator
Mar 4, 2000
27,370
239
106
RTP! OP has in hand, two AV packages, and asks which of the two is better. He does not ask for alternative solutions, although they may be better. So, answer the question. Between the two, Webroot and McAfee, which is better?
 

PliotronX

Diamond Member
Oct 17, 1999
8,883
107
106
RTP! OP has in hand, two AV packages, and asks which of the two is better. He does not ask for alternative solutions, although they may be better. So, answer the question. Between the two, Webroot and McAfee, which is better?
Weeeebroooooooooot :thumbsup:
 

Captante

Lifer
Oct 20, 2003
30,337
10,855
136
The answer isn't as obvious as it seems in fact I'd say its about even with maybe a slight edge going to McAfee.

McAfee AV at one time was just plain worthless however since being purchased by Intel it has been improved steadily. I still wouldn't suggest purchasing it if you didn't already own it but its serviceable especially @ $15/lifetime.
 

PliotronX

Diamond Member
Oct 17, 1999
8,883
107
106
Proof of Intels influence improving McRapee? The brand is soiled for me. It was all right in the 90s and the Enterprise version for the early 2000s but its just about more trouble than its worth today. Webroot is up there with the likes of Bitdefender and Kaspersky. Those and Eset are the only AVs worth paying for over Security Essentials.
 

Captante

Lifer
Oct 20, 2003
30,337
10,855
136
Before I discovered MBAM I used Spy-Sweeper for years and never had a problem with it so I can't say anything bad about Webroot. (and I didn't)

What I did say was neither one of these programs would be my first choice but from what I've read recently McAfee is much improved since being purchased by Intel.
 

sonitravel09

Senior member
Jun 25, 2014
217
4
46
I wouldn't use either. I would use a mixed secuirty protection using all free applications.

Spybot
Comdo Firewall
Avira or Avast.
 

Ketchup

Elite Member
Sep 1, 2002
14,558
248
106
I have had too remove tons of viruses and malware from way to many computers using Malwarebytes. All it will do is slow down your computer.

Webroot would be better, but I don't think it would be any better than MSE, it would just slow you down more.
 

RompinRaider

Junior Member
Jan 5, 2013
3
0
0
Have used them both many times....Webroot. It simply works and is fast! Webroot is just ahead of the curve.
 

alexruiz

Platinum Member
Sep 21, 2001
2,836
556
126
Webroot easily.
If you have used both, you know it.
Webroot is so light in system resources that it barely makes an impact on PC performance.
 

SlickR12345

Senior member
Jan 9, 2010
542
44
91
www.clubvalenciacf.com
Webroot, they have a very fast scanner, the program is very light, everything it does it does in the background and it doesn't take any resources at that either.

It does lack some options and features since its so simple and easy to use, but for most people that would be okay.

Otherwise I would just a good firewall like Comodo v7 free firewall and MBAM 2. You don't really need proactive defense, since all it does is basically scan files all the time and use computer resources, making stuff slower.
 

BirdDad

Golden Member
Nov 25, 2004
1,131
0
71
I use AVG Free
My ISP got me to buy their security package deal for $1 and it comes with McCrappy, I have been wondering if it has changed much since 2000(back then huge problems). I was wondering if it might protect me better than AVG.
 

Ketchup

Elite Member
Sep 1, 2002
14,558
248
106
I use AVG Free
My ISP got me to buy their security package deal for $1 and it comes with McCrappy, I have been wondering if it has changed much since 2000(back then huge problems). I was wondering if it might protect me better than AVG.

Nope, seems just as bad as it always was. Last year received money from some very nice folks due to heavily infected computers "protected" my McAfee. Their browsing habits of course did not help, but I was surprised just how bad things got with no warnings from the av.