- Aug 23, 2003
- 25,375
- 142
- 116
Ties to an extreme right-wing secessionist group?Originally posted by: joshsquall
Holy shit, politicians aren't supposed to look out for their constituency first?
Originally posted by: Pliablemoose
Originally posted by: jpeyton
Thanks for the bump!Originally posted by: Pliablemoose
Waiting for a denial here davepeyton
Got to keep this near the top.
Dave, just go ahead & admit it, there are too many similarities...
Originally posted by: cliftonite
Hes not the one that had to be reinstated from a ban now is he?
Originally posted by: ProfJohn
Has KOS always been this stupid?? Or are they out to win some award for stupidest political website?
Originally posted by: TechAZ
Jpeyton, keep us up to date on your RSS feeds from Digg.com, Salon.com, Democraticunderground.com, DailyKOS.com, Huffingtonpost.com, and Olbermann's show. This is some good stuff!
Originally posted by: jpeyton
Thanks for the bump!Originally posted by: Pliablemoose
Waiting for a denial here davepeyton
Got to keep this near the top.
Originally posted by: ZeroIQ
Small towns have bonds for projects like the ice hockey arena or roads... projects that need to be done for the community and such that they can't afford but will pay for itself over time.
Most people, and probably you, did not know about the "under God" quote on the money and who was responsible for it until you read that in one of your left wing blogs. You're really digging with that one. I love your partial news clip.
Attacking her for wanting to open ANWR will not be a good political move for you guys, about 50% of the country is for it. Also, I don't think it's going to be healthy to attack McCain for not picking someone that agrees with him 100% on every issue, considering how many issue Obama and Biden clash on.
jpeyton - shutup, you're annoying as hell.
Originally posted by: cliftonite
Originally posted by: Pliablemoose
Originally posted by: jpeyton
Thanks for the bump!Originally posted by: Pliablemoose
Waiting for a denial here davepeyton
Got to keep this near the top.
Dave, just go ahead & admit it, there are too many similarities...
I believe mod call outs are against the rules? Hes not the one that had to be reinstated from a ban now is he?
Originally posted by: JD50
Originally posted by: cliftonite
Originally posted by: Pliablemoose
Originally posted by: jpeyton
Thanks for the bump!Originally posted by: Pliablemoose
Waiting for a denial here davepeyton
Got to keep this near the top.
Dave, just go ahead & admit it, there are too many similarities...
I believe mod call outs are against the rules? Hes not the one that had to be reinstated from a ban now is he?
How is that a mod call out? You're the first one to mention that he's a mod, are you looking for a ban?
Originally posted by: BeauJangles
Originally posted by: ZeroIQ
Small towns have bonds for projects like the ice hockey arena or roads... projects that need to be done for the community and such that they can't afford but will pay for itself over time.
Most people, and probably you, did not know about the "under God" quote on the money and who was responsible for it until you read that in one of your left wing blogs. You're really digging with that one. I love your partial news clip.
Attacking her for wanting to open ANWR will not be a good political move for you guys, about 50% of the country is for it. Also, I don't think it's going to be healthy to attack McCain for not picking someone that agrees with him 100% on every issue, considering how many issue Obama and Biden clash on.
jpeyton - shutup, you're annoying as hell.
Opening ANWR would be the dumbest thing we could do. There isn't enough oil there to make a substantial difference in our prices and we'd be destroying another American national treasure. I'm no tree-hugger, but I also recognize that we're slowing destroying some of the most beautiful parts of this country and ANWR would be a crime against future generations of Americans.
Originally posted by: TechAZ
Originally posted by: BeauJangles
Originally posted by: ZeroIQ
Small towns have bonds for projects like the ice hockey arena or roads... projects that need to be done for the community and such that they can't afford but will pay for itself over time.
Most people, and probably you, did not know about the "under God" quote on the money and who was responsible for it until you read that in one of your left wing blogs. You're really digging with that one. I love your partial news clip.
Attacking her for wanting to open ANWR will not be a good political move for you guys, about 50% of the country is for it. Also, I don't think it's going to be healthy to attack McCain for not picking someone that agrees with him 100% on every issue, considering how many issue Obama and Biden clash on.
jpeyton - shutup, you're annoying as hell.
Opening ANWR would be the dumbest thing we could do. There isn't enough oil there to make a substantial difference in our prices and we'd be destroying another American national treasure. I'm no tree-hugger, but I also recognize that we're slowing destroying some of the most beautiful parts of this country and ANWR would be a crime against future generations of Americans.
http://www.anwr.org/flash.htm
And who says there isn't enough oil there to make a difference? Democrats? Environmental Lobbyists? A handful of "experts"?
Originally posted by: BeauJangles
Estimates peg it at less than 1.5 % of consumption in 2030, when it would come online. That wouldn't impact prices much and, like I said, I'd rather leave ANWR untouched and pay 15 cents more per gallon of gas.
Originally posted by: TechAZ
Originally posted by: BeauJangles
Originally posted by: ZeroIQ
Small towns have bonds for projects like the ice hockey arena or roads... projects that need to be done for the community and such that they can't afford but will pay for itself over time.
Most people, and probably you, did not know about the "under God" quote on the money and who was responsible for it until you read that in one of your left wing blogs. You're really digging with that one. I love your partial news clip.
Attacking her for wanting to open ANWR will not be a good political move for you guys, about 50% of the country is for it. Also, I don't think it's going to be healthy to attack McCain for not picking someone that agrees with him 100% on every issue, considering how many issue Obama and Biden clash on.
jpeyton - shutup, you're annoying as hell.
Opening ANWR would be the dumbest thing we could do. There isn't enough oil there to make a substantial difference in our prices and we'd be destroying another American national treasure. I'm no tree-hugger, but I also recognize that we're slowing destroying some of the most beautiful parts of this country and ANWR would be a crime against future generations of Americans.
http://www.anwr.org/flash.htm
And who says there isn't enough oil there to make a difference? Democrats? Environmental Lobbyists? A handful of "experts"?
Originally posted by: eskimospy
Originally posted by: TechAZ
Originally posted by: BeauJangles
Originally posted by: ZeroIQ
Small towns have bonds for projects like the ice hockey arena or roads... projects that need to be done for the community and such that they can't afford but will pay for itself over time.
Most people, and probably you, did not know about the "under God" quote on the money and who was responsible for it until you read that in one of your left wing blogs. You're really digging with that one. I love your partial news clip.
Attacking her for wanting to open ANWR will not be a good political move for you guys, about 50% of the country is for it. Also, I don't think it's going to be healthy to attack McCain for not picking someone that agrees with him 100% on every issue, considering how many issue Obama and Biden clash on.
jpeyton - shutup, you're annoying as hell.
Opening ANWR would be the dumbest thing we could do. There isn't enough oil there to make a substantial difference in our prices and we'd be destroying another American national treasure. I'm no tree-hugger, but I also recognize that we're slowing destroying some of the most beautiful parts of this country and ANWR would be a crime against future generations of Americans.
http://www.anwr.org/flash.htm
And who says there isn't enough oil there to make a difference? Democrats? Environmental Lobbyists? A handful of "experts"?
"The Federal Government"?
Originally posted by: eskimospy
Originally posted by: TechAZ
http://www.anwr.org/flash.htm
And who says there isn't enough oil there to make a difference? Democrats? Environmental Lobbyists? A handful of "experts"?
"The Federal Government"?
Originally posted by: heyheybooboo
Originally posted by: eskimospy
Originally posted by: TechAZ
http://www.anwr.org/flash.htm
And who says there isn't enough oil there to make a difference? Democrats? Environmental Lobbyists? A handful of "experts"?
"The Federal Government"?
More specific - the Department of Energy - lol
Try Google, TechAZ ... it really, really works
Originally posted by: TechAZ
Originally posted by: BeauJangles
Estimates peg it at less than 1.5 % of consumption in 2030, when it would come online. That wouldn't impact prices much and, like I said, I'd rather leave ANWR untouched and pay 15 cents more per gallon of gas.
I would too, but I'm not going to just sit there and take left winger/environmentalist estimates at face value. And the part about it's beauty there is far far from the truth. That's what the environmentalists portrayed, mountains, trees, polar bears. It's tundra, not some vacation or wildlife watching area.
Originally posted by: BeauJangles
Originally posted by: TechAZ
Originally posted by: BeauJangles
Estimates peg it at less than 1.5 % of consumption in 2030, when it would come online. That wouldn't impact prices much and, like I said, I'd rather leave ANWR untouched and pay 15 cents more per gallon of gas.
I would too, but I'm not going to just sit there and take left winger/environmentalist estimates at face value. And the part about it's beauty there is far far from the truth. That's what the environmentalists portrayed, mountains, trees, polar bears. It's tundra, not some vacation or wildlife watching area.
Who cares if it's tundra? I still don't like the idea of covering the Sonora Desert with condos even though it's just a pile of sand.
'Nuff said. The hockey-mom wanted to immortalize herself with a poorly planned, poorly funded, poorly thought-out facility. Then she skipped town, leaving the residents with tens of millions of dollars in debt.Originally posted by: heyheybooboo
The annual operating cost (no debt service or capital expense) is around $220,000 a year.
The facility generates around $65,000 a year in revenues ...