Originally posted by: Duvie
Yes that is a repost but remember this is Intel "king of spin".....Conroe whas major wattage reduction so versus the out of control prescott with tremendous leakage it may mean the chip has 1.5x the actual performance max.....There are not saying it will be 5x faster.....If conroe was 1/5th the power consumed then it would be virtually no performance gain yet the statement would be true....
intel nice new chart and tricky wording is clear sign IMO this chip is not all that it is cracked up to be.....
Originally posted by: Duvie
I also see maybe what clarkey01 is saying...I cant see how the prescott beat the northwood unless it was like the p4a models with no HT or anything on the 130nm process...cause a 130nm p4c should be better then the prescot based on this chart with its tricky wording.....
By the way when is Intel going to get their arse kicked in court for their illegal doings??? Maybe need to start a new thread to see the latest....
Originally posted by: Hacp
Wow Clarkey thats the first time I noticed it. Prescotts performance per watt is better than Northwoods :shocked: :shocked: :shocked:
Originally posted by: munky
LOL, while we're at it, look at this picture:
http://images.anandtech.com/reviews/tra...F/2005/Fall/Day1/Keynote1/IMG_2582.JPG
Notice how one line is the mirror opposite of the other. I'd like to see what data this chart is based on...
Um, it should be? If you only have 2 choices (laptop and desktop), then as total percentage of sales goes up on one, the other goes down the same percent.Originally posted by: munky
LOL, while we're at it, look at this picture:
http://images.anandtech.com/reviews/tra...F/2005/Fall/Day1/Keynote1/IMG_2582.JPG
Notice how one line is the mirror opposite of the other. I'd like to see what data this chart is based on...
Originally posted by: TuxDave
Originally posted by: munky
LOL, while we're at it, look at this picture:
http://images.anandtech.com/reviews/tra...F/2005/Fall/Day1/Keynote1/IMG_2582.JPG
Notice how one line is the mirror opposite of the other. I'd like to see what data this chart is based on...
Because Laptop + Desktop = US Retail PC Sales?
Originally posted by: munky
Originally posted by: TuxDave
Originally posted by: munky
LOL, while we're at it, look at this picture:
http://images.anandtech.com/reviews/tra...F/2005/Fall/Day1/Keynote1/IMG_2582.JPG
Notice how one line is the mirror opposite of the other. I'd like to see what data this chart is based on...
Because Laptop + Desktop = US Retail PC Sales?
But doesnt the amount of PC sales in total generally increase? Seems a bit too generalized and simplified to me, and again, no data to back up their claim.