- Mar 17, 2008
- 26,572
- 15,887
- 136
So WH isnt playing ball here.
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/w...ld-trump-anchor-house-oversight-a7702611.html
http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow/...ouse-subpoenas-to-get-flynn-docs-929687619966
We can all speculate at *one* reason why that may be, however, can anyone offer the other side of that argument?
https://www.usnews.com/news/politic...out-if-russia-paid-michael-flynn-in-2015-2016
Is it a simple matter of principle? Is the WH bound by law to release these documents?
1:38
http://edition.cnn.com/2017/04/25/politics/michael-flynn-house-oversight-committee/
There is no documents? How does this all add up? They cant doument how they vetted Flynn ... is that a problem? (yes its a problem, but is it a legal problem?)
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/w...ld-trump-anchor-house-oversight-a7702611.html
http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow/...ouse-subpoenas-to-get-flynn-docs-929687619966
We can all speculate at *one* reason why that may be, however, can anyone offer the other side of that argument?
https://www.usnews.com/news/politic...out-if-russia-paid-michael-flynn-in-2015-2016
Is it a simple matter of principle? Is the WH bound by law to release these documents?
1:38
http://edition.cnn.com/2017/04/25/politics/michael-flynn-house-oversight-committee/
There is no documents? How does this all add up? They cant doument how they vetted Flynn ... is that a problem? (yes its a problem, but is it a legal problem?)
Last edited:
