Matrox M9140 - passively cooled?

utahraptor

Golden Member
Apr 26, 2004
1,069
244
116
Does the benefit of having 512K width memory bus outweigh the downside of not being actively cooled?
 

ViRGE

Elite Member, Moderator Emeritus
Oct 9, 1999
31,516
167
106
If you're looking at Matrox cards then you're obviously not concerned with performance. I would not even worry about memory bus width and focus on your other needs.
 

Arkadrel

Diamond Member
Oct 19, 2010
3,681
2
0
What Virge said... Matrox doesnt make anything speedy when it comes to 3D performance.

Im not really sure why anyone would buy a matrox card at this point... but again like Virge said its not for its performance (so dont worry about bus lengths or anything).


OBS!

Operating Systems Supported (from newegg) =
Microsoft Windows XP (32/64bit), Microsoft Windows Vista (32/64bit), Microsoft Windows Server 2003/2008 (32/64bit)

Doesnt mention Windows 7....
 
Last edited:

BTA

Senior member
Jun 7, 2005
862
0
71
Matrox was seriously impressive for 2D quality back in the day. And they had a couple entries in the 3D arena that were decent performers with very good picture quality, but this was back in the TNT and 3Dfx years.

I imagine they have stayed in their niche of 2D quality and multi-display setups at this point.
 

-Slacker-

Golden Member
Feb 24, 2010
1,563
0
76
Personally, I'd be scared to use a 512 bit vc that's passively cooled. Remember the last time a company made a 512 bit card?...hd2900xt ... yeah...