matrix reloded wallpapers

BennyD

Banned
Sep 1, 2002
2,068
0
0
i have just made a matrix reloaded wallpaper for myself and thought that i would share it with everyone here as i think it's pretty.

only concern i have is that a W bros will find me and kill me, do i need to obtain permission to post these papers (containing promo images) or what?

if i don't they are all ready to be got at

edit: here they are:

1st attempt viri white 1600
2nd attempt viri coded 1600
2nd attempt resized 1152

guess my favourite characters :p
 

aphex

Moderator<br>All Things Apple
Moderator
Jul 19, 2001
38,572
2
91
As long as your not selling them, i highly doubt they would go after you at all.
 

datalink7

Lifer
Jan 23, 2001
16,765
6
81
Just because you create a "pretty" wallpaper you think you can get away with this? :frown: I'll have you know that I work for Warner Bro's
(Of cource, not on a high level management position but high enough to know policy) and know that they frown on this sort of thing.

Know this: if you post such copywrited material on the internet for distribution the legal department will hunt you down and prosecute you to the full
extent of the law. Have a nice day.

edited for clarity :p
 

BennyD

Banned
Sep 1, 2002
2,068
0
0
Originally posted by: datalink7
Just because you create a "pretty" wallpaper you think you can get away with this? :frown: I'll have you know that I work for Warner Bro's
(Of cource, not on a high level management position but high enough to know policy) and know that they frown on this sort of thing.

Know this: if you post such copywrited material on the internet for distribution the legal department will hunt you down and prosecute you to the full
extent of the law. Have a nice day.

if i recieve an email from WB legal dep i'll take em down
 

datalink7

Lifer
Jan 23, 2001
16,765
6
81
Originally posted by: BennyD
Originally posted by: datalink7
Just because you create a "pretty" wallpaper you think you can get away with this? :frown: I'll have you know that I work for Warner Bro's
(Of cource, not on a high level management position but high enough to know policy) and know that they frown on this sort of thing.

Know this: if you post such copywrited material on the internet for distribution the legal department will hunt you down and prosecute you to the full
extent of the law. Have a nice day.

if i recieve an email from WB legal dep i'll take em down

Don't worry about datalink... he is a moron who doesn't know what he's talking about.

edit: btw... I like number 2 a lot. Good job :)
 

aphex

Moderator<br>All Things Apple
Moderator
Jul 19, 2001
38,572
2
91
Originally posted by: datalink7
Just because you create a "pretty" wallpaper you think you can get away with this? :frown: I'll have you know that I work for Warner Bro's
(Of cource, not on a high level management position but high enough to know policy) and know that they frown on this sort of thing.

Know this: if you post such copywrited material on the internet for distribution the legal department will hunt you down and prosecute you to the full
extent of the law. Have a nice day.

You could try being a little bit less asshole-ish in your response.
 

Pr0Hawk

Platinum Member
Feb 12, 2001
2,607
0
0
You can download the original ones off whatisthematrix.com for free. He just edited them a little probably using some simple filters and is now posting them up on the internet.


HIGHLY ILLEGAL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :D
 

datalink7

Lifer
Jan 23, 2001
16,765
6
81
Originally posted by: aphex
Originally posted by: datalink7
Just because you create a "pretty" wallpaper you think you can get away with this? :frown: I'll have you know that I work for Warner Bro's
(Of cource, not on a high level management position but high enough to know policy) and know that they frown on this sort of thing.

Know this: if you post such copywrited material on the internet for distribution the legal department will hunt you down and prosecute you to the full
extent of the law. Have a nice day.

You could try being a little bit less asshole-ish in your response.

:p
 

SSP

Lifer
Oct 11, 1999
17,727
0
0
As long as you don?t edit it in a way its offensive, and don?t get some kind of crazy publicity for it, you have nothing to worry about.

Btw, the 2nd one is nice. If only the guy in the right had a bit more details, it'd be perfect. :)
 

Kev

Lifer
Dec 17, 2001
16,367
4
81
Originally posted by: datalink7
Just because you create a "pretty" wallpaper you think you can get away with this? :frown: I'll have you know that I work for Warner Bro's
(Of cource, not on a high level management position but high enough to know policy) and know that they frown on this sort of thing.

Know this: if you post such copywrited material on the internet for distribution the legal department will hunt you down and prosecute you to the full
extent of the law. Have a nice day.

rolleye.gif



nice work benny.

i'm going to use the 2nd one you posted once i get sick of the official smith wp :)
 

SilverThief

Diamond Member
May 20, 2000
5,720
1
0
Originally posted by: datalink7
Just because you create a "pretty" wallpaper you think you can get away with this? :frown: I'll have you know that I work for Warner Bro's
(Of cource, not on a high level management position but high enough to know policy) and know that they frown on this sort of thing.

Know this: if you post such copywrited material on the internet for distribution the legal department will hunt you down and prosecute you to the full
extent of the law. Have a nice day.

edited for clarity :p

Of cource, not on a high level management position..........

security guard?
hat check guy?
bathroom steward?

hahahahaha!
I think he's jerking your chain
:D

 

halik

Lifer
Oct 10, 2000
25,696
1
81
hahaha dude you cant really call it your wallpaper when all you do is command-i (inverse) a la #1...
 

RyanM

Platinum Member
Feb 12, 2001
2,387
0
76
Yeah, dude, it would certainly be one thing if you took source images from the Matrix site, and manipulated them in a way which is both original and makes it difficult to recognize where they came from.

#2 sorta meets that criteria, but could definitely use some work. If you create the code from scratch, the work will contain more of your own material than theirs, which makes posting it for download (albeit free) perfectly legal. #1 is just a inverse filter effect run on the original 1600 res wallpaper, and can be called blatant copyright infringement.
 

BennyD

Banned
Sep 1, 2002
2,068
0
0
Originally posted by: MachFive
Yeah, dude, it would certainly be one thing if you took source images from the Matrix site, and manipulated them in a way which is both original and makes it difficult to recognize where they came from.

#2 sorta meets that criteria, but could definitely use some work. If you create the code from scratch, the work will contain more of your own material than theirs, which makes posting it for download (albeit free) perfectly legal. #1 is just a inverse filter effect run on the original 1600 res wallpaper, and can be called blatant copyright infringement.

#1 is not just an inverse filter from the 1600 wallpaper, i used the image from the poster -

try and replicate number one, it's not that easy because for the text i had to create an alpha channel (from scratch) and apply it to that text.
if i just ran an inverse filter the text would be pink

#2 was created from 2 posters, the code i used was partially created but i used a poster image as the source for the text
 

RyanM

Platinum Member
Feb 12, 2001
2,387
0
76
Originally posted by: BennyD
Originally posted by: MachFive
Yeah, dude, it would certainly be one thing if you took source images from the Matrix site, and manipulated them in a way which is both original and makes it difficult to recognize where they came from.

#2 sorta meets that criteria, but could definitely use some work. If you create the code from scratch, the work will contain more of your own material than theirs, which makes posting it for download (albeit free) perfectly legal. #1 is just a inverse filter effect run on the original 1600 res wallpaper, and can be called blatant copyright infringement.

#1 is not just an inverse filter from the 1600 wallpaper, i used the image from the poster -

try and replicate number one, it's not that easy because for the text i had to create an alpha channel (from scratch) and apply it to that text.
if i just ran an inverse filter the text would be pink

#2 was created from 2 posters, the code i used was partially created but i used a poster image as the source for the text

Ah, my bad. For some reason, I had mistaken #1 for an inverse of this one, but obviously, that whole alpha channel negates the fact it was ripped almost straight from the source images.

Listen, if you want to qualify for fair use, it's gonna take more than an inverse and (my bad) and ALPHA CHANNEL to do so. You're going to have to create original segments of the image, and use MUCH more of your own stuff than the original work.

Take this for example. Yes, it uses photographs of Keanu and Hugo. But ignoring the code, both images have had segments added to them, and there was a LOT of airbrushing to clean up the myriad artifacts from working from the low-res images.

On top of that, the code was created entirely from scratch, and I created the lettering using curves, also from scratch. If I felt like it, I could finish off the rest of the alphabet and publish a Matrix font.

So EVEN if I turned off the actual image layers, there'd still be the lettering, the code, and a lot of airbrushing in the general shape of Keanu and Hugo.

I respect the fact you're trying - That's really the hardest part. I remember when I was just starting out. My advice to you is work with non-copyrighted material.

I got my start doing crap for CS-Art - Some of my first pieces ever in photoshop can be found here. They're the ones by - you guessed it - Mach5. ;-)

I'm not saying what you're doing is crap, I'm just saying this:

1. Be careful with copyrighted material.
2. Start off working with non-copyrighted material, since that will give you MUCH more freedom to play around.
3. GET PERMISSION from the author of any material which is questionably copyrightable.

Hope this helps!
 

Looney

Lifer
Jun 13, 2000
21,938
5
0
Originally posted by: MercenaryForHire
Like WB will really care about fan-made images that are given away for free. Post away.

- M4H

Didn't Star Trek go after fan sites for displaying ST images without consent?
 

RyanM

Platinum Member
Feb 12, 2001
2,387
0
76
Originally posted by: Moralpanic
Originally posted by: MercenaryForHire
Like WB will really care about fan-made images that are given away for free. Post away.

- M4H

Didn't Star Trek go after fan sites for displaying ST images without consent?

I do recall something along those lines. It's just the mere rumor of that sort of that that gets my filters in a knot. ;-)
 
Oct 19, 2000
17,860
4
81
Originally posted by: SilverThief
Originally posted by: datalink7
Just because you create a "pretty" wallpaper you think you can get away with this? :frown: I'll have you know that I work for Warner Bro's
(Of cource, not on a high level management position but high enough to know policy) and know that they frown on this sort of thing.

Know this: if you post such copywrited material on the internet for distribution the legal department will hunt you down and prosecute you to the full
extent of the law. Have a nice day.

edited for clarity :p

Of cource, not on a high level management position..........

security guard?
hat check guy?
bathroom steward
hahahahaha!
I think he's jerking your chain
:D

DING DING DING!! I'll take bathroom steward for a $1000 Alex!!!
 
Oct 19, 2000
17,860
4
81
Oh, and as far as them throwing you in jail for posting these wallpapers you have made, I really, REALLY don't think I'd worry about it. I would beleive WB have a lot more on their hands with stopping the rampant piracy of this movie on the net at the moment than shutting your operation down.

Plus, the Wachowski Bros would see this as fan support. And with the fan base the Matrix trilogy has, you definitely aren't the first to extend some homemade wallpapers to the general forum public, wherever they may be.

To sum it up, datalink is a tard.