- Sep 21, 2001
- 18,447
- 133
- 106
Originally posted by: Skoorb
There are lots of things math can't solve (in that we don't have the equations for variables) and I expect the complexities of relationships to be high on that list![]()
Originally posted by: Skoorb
There are lots of things math can't solve (in that we don't have the equations for variables) and I expect the complexities of relationships to be high on that list![]()
Originally posted by: upsciLLion
Originally posted by: Skoorb
There are lots of things math can't solve (in that we don't have the equations for variables) and I expect the complexities of relationships to be high on that list![]()
People underestimate math too often.
Originally posted by: HotChic
Originally posted by: upsciLLion
Originally posted by: Skoorb
There are lots of things math can't solve (in that we don't have the equations for variables) and I expect the complexities of relationships to be high on that list![]()
People underestimate math too often.
I would be more likely to doubt their method of making the data quantifiable. A sarcastic eye roll may be huge to one couple and nothing to another, so the weighting of the data might be difficult.
Originally posted by: Dissipate
Who cares about this inane crap? If I were a mathematician I would be searching for a formula to predict the stock market.
Originally posted by: Dissipate
Who cares about this inane crap? If I were a mathematician I would be searching for a formula to predict the stock market.