• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

matching CPU-NB freq to HT freq = more stable??

S

soccerballtux

Lifer
anyone seen this before, or am I crazy? Is 2.6ghz hT link ok?
edit: no. It (cpu-nb) must just not like having such a high bus speed. Seems like to <250mhz. At 271mhz it required +0.1v just to be stable at 2.15ish ghz.
 
Last edited:
soccerballtux said:
anyone seen this before, or am I crazy? Is 2.6ghz hT link ok?
edit: no. It (cpu-nb) must just not like having such a high bus speed. Seems like to <250mhz. At 271mhz it required +0.1v just to be stable at 2.15ish ghz.
Click to expand...

It is recommended you keep the HT Frequency as close to stock (lower is better than higher also, if you have to choose between them) because HT frequency will never be a bottleneck and effects stability. If you want better stability at higher CPU-NB speeds, raise the CPU-NB voltage.
 
No problem. Be careful with CPU-NB voltage though, because as expected, raising it will increase the temperatures of the CPU overall because the IMC is integrated onto the CPU. Only start raising it when your CPU-NB Frequency is very high.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top