CADsortaGUY
Lifer
Originally posted by: Zephyr106
No it's not. Let me tell you why. Even IF a person is "born gay" that still does not exclude them from being "married". They still can marry a woman if they are a man, and vice-versa.
"born gay" in quotations seems to indicate that you think gays can just "stop being silly faggots", or that the word of the Lord can convert them. IIRC this has been scientifically disproved. So if a social institution based on a biological fact of heterosexuality does not allow for the biological fact of homosexuality, it returns to my previous example. Based on your comment, if the red haired guy wants to run for office when red heads are not allowed by law, sure, he can just dye his hair black and enter the race. A silly example, that can be extrapolated to the marriage debate. Should not society allow for biological traits that do not harm bystanders?
Zephyr
Talk about your pre-conceived Bowfin..vine excrement. "born gay" was in response to the "biology" assertion, but if you think they are "silly faggots" then I suppose we should probably end this conversion - no? Society already "allows for biological traits". I didn't see anyone here say gays should be killed or quarantined. They can function in society just like the rest of us to - they are human you know The fact that they don't marry someone of the opposite sex does not mean that they can redefine marriage to fit them. They have every opportunity to marry someone of the opposite sex as anyone else regardless of their "biology".
CkG