Originally posted by: Apathetic
Margarine, as you've found, out can NOT be used as a substitute for butter when baking.
Dave
butter flavored crisco,+ a lil water works ok..
🙂
borrowed below from here
The choc. chip shortbread above
notwithstanding, margarine really has no
place in baking. The difference between the
two, to a baker, is the melting point. Marg
has a higher melting point than butter, so
that butter melts in ones mouth and marg
doesn't. That's why things made with marg
seems "wrong" -- they dont' have the right
moughfeel. Another point: most margarines
have all the health "benefits" of butter --
so why use it; and the ones that are low fat
have too much water to be useful in
baking.
Crisco is a different beast. It doesn't have
much flavor, unlike butter, and leads to a
different textured batter than butter. This
is particularly notiable in pie crust.
Butter leads to a crumbly crust, crisco to a
somewhat flaky crust, and lard to a very
flaky crust. It also leads to differently
textured cookies, but I don't know why. But
I do know that cookies made with butter are
chewier than the same cookies made with
crisco.
OK, OK, so my bias is obvious. But at least
I have some science to back it up.