March figures show biggest job gains in three years

Page 4 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Patranus

Diamond Member
Apr 15, 2007
9,280
0
0
Funny when your hero Bush was in, it was 150,000 a month now that your arch enemy is in control you add 100,000 to the number.

Predictable you America haters are, predictable.

The unemployment rate under Bush was ~4.5%.

It is much easier to go from no jobs to few jobs than it is to go from many many jobs to many many many more jobs. Imagine a logarithmic scale.
 

ShawnD1

Lifer
May 24, 2003
15,987
2
81
The unemployment rate under Bush was ~4.5%.

It is much easier to go from no jobs to few jobs than it is to go from many many jobs to many many many more jobs. Imagine a logarithmic scale.

Sounds a bit like the way dodge rates are calculated in world of warcraft.
rate of change = dX/(1 - X)

What this formula says is that a 1% change is not always a 1% change. Going from a 1% dodge to 2% dodge is a very small increase because it's only changing from 99% chance of being hit to a 98% chance of being hit. If we start at something like 95% dodge, a 1% increase means going from 5% being hit to 4% being hit; effectively a 20% change.

We'll replace "dodge" with employed and replace "hit" with unemployed.
effective change = (employment change) / (1 - employed)

Put it in excel and you'll see what it looks like. It looks like a regular 1/X curve but it's flipped sort of.


edit
Here's a picture

employment.png
 
Last edited:

IGBT

Lifer
Jul 16, 2001
17,969
140
106
CNN Money ^ | 04/08/10 |
NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- The number of Americans filing for unemployment insurance for the first time jumped last week, according to government data released Thursday. There were 460,000 initial jobless claims filed in the week ended April 3, up 18,000 from an upwardly revised 442,000 the previous week, according to the Labor Department's weekly report.