Originally posted by: Kwaipie
Da News
Interesting, you'd think they would need to pass a new law for something like this. Regardless, this is no way to treat someone suffering from this disease.
Originally posted by: ahurtt
Originally posted by: Kwaipie
Da News
Interesting, you'd think they would need to pass a new law for something like this. Regardless, this is no way to treat someone suffering from this disease.
Did you even read the part about how it said he was uncooperative and refused to follow Dr.'s orders on the precautions he was supposed to take to avoid infecting other people? He can rot in hell for all I care. I think he's right where he deserves to be. If he's too inconsiderate not to risk killing other people with his disease he doesn't deserve to live out his final days in freedom.
Originally posted by: ahurtt
Originally posted by: Kwaipie
Da News
Interesting, you'd think they would need to pass a new law for something like this. Regardless, this is no way to treat someone suffering from this disease.
Did you even read the part about how it said he was uncooperative and refused to follow Dr.'s orders on the precautions he was supposed to take to avoid infecting other people? He can rot in hell for all I care. I think he's right where he deserves to be. If he's too inconsiderate not to risk killing other people with his disease he doesn't deserve to live out his final days in freedom.
Originally posted by: Kwaipie
Originally posted by: ahurtt
Originally posted by: Kwaipie
Da News
Interesting, you'd think they would need to pass a new law for something like this. Regardless, this is no way to treat someone suffering from this disease.
Did you even read the part about how it said he was uncooperative and refused to follow Dr.'s orders on the precautions he was supposed to take to avoid infecting other people? He can rot in hell for all I care. I think he's right where he deserves to be. If he's too inconsiderate not to risk killing other people with his disease he doesn't deserve to live out his final days in freedom.
I forget the part of our legal system that says doctor's orders are legally binding.
Originally posted by: ahurtt
Originally posted by: Kwaipie
Originally posted by: ahurtt
Originally posted by: Kwaipie
Da News
Interesting, you'd think they would need to pass a new law for something like this. Regardless, this is no way to treat someone suffering from this disease.
Did you even read the part about how it said he was uncooperative and refused to follow Dr.'s orders on the precautions he was supposed to take to avoid infecting other people? He can rot in hell for all I care. I think he's right where he deserves to be. If he's too inconsiderate not to risk killing other people with his disease he doesn't deserve to live out his final days in freedom.
I forget the part of our legal system that says doctor's orders are legally binding.
You forget? Or is it more like you didn't even research the subject in depth at all and just started jumping to conclusions about the way things are and should be in the world according to Kwaipie? Yeah, that's what I thought.
Originally posted by: Lenine
Lol it would be funny if people opposing this get this TB.
Originally posted by: umbrella39
"Where I come from, the doctors don't wear masks"......
Well tough sh!t. Where I come from we have to be fitted for HEPA masks to deal with these TB patients. Go back to Russia and spread your TB with a clear mind.
Originally posted by: getbush
Commercial reasons
for lack of innovation
1. Antibiotics not as profitable as drugs to treat
chronic diseases
2. Pharma industry consolidation: fewer people
in fewer companies doing antibiotic research
3. Science is particularly difficult = financial risk
4. Highly genericised market ? overall price is
low
5. Push to reduce use to tackle resistance ?
reduces size of market
6. Risk-averse regulatory environment: onerous
for antibiotics
7. Inevitability of resistance limits antibiotic
lifespan ? limits duration in market place