Man to spend life in prison for killing teens in burglary

brandonb

Diamond Member
Oct 17, 2006
3,731
2
0
I live about 20 minutes from there. I disagree with the verdict in this case.

Kids were addicted to drugs and kept robbing this guy and stealing his pills (from what I understand from the locals, which I assume that evidence was suppressed in court)... So yes, he was expecting them because they were addicts needing a fix, and past history said they'd be back. He was waiting for them and killed them.

Should he have called the Police? Probably. But it's my opinion that your house is your sanctuary, and they were repeatedly violating it. They terrorized the old man to bring out that anger where he wanted the revenge. Who do you fault if someone repeatedly kicks a dog, and eventually the dog bites back? The dog or the person kicking it?
 
Jan 25, 2011
17,097
9,582
146
I live about 20 minutes from there. I disagree with the verdict in this case.

Kids were addicted to drugs and kept robbing this guy and stealing his pills (from what I understand from the locals, which I assume that evidence was suppressed in court)... So yes, he was expecting them because they were addicts needing a fix, and past history said they'd be back. He was waiting for them and killed them.

Should he have called the Police? Probably. But it's my opinion that your house is your sanctuary, and they were repeatedly violating it. They terrorized the old man to bring out that anger where he wanted the revenge. Who do you fault if someone repeatedly kicks a dog, and eventually the dog bites back? The dog or the person kicking it?

He rehearsed everything he would do and say after the shooting in his own recordings. That's not fear, that's premeditation.
 

TheSiege

Diamond Member
Jun 5, 2004
3,918
14
81
From what it states, he planned on killing them, when he should have planned to stop the robberies from happening. Plus he moved his vehicle to make it look like no one was home. I don't know if he should be guilty of murder, but conspiracy to commit murder or something along those lines.
 

brandonb

Diamond Member
Oct 17, 2006
3,731
2
0
He rehearsed everything he would do and say after the shooting in his own recordings. That's not fear, that's premeditation.

Right...

He didn't go to their house with plans to kill them. He was preparing to defend himself. He didn't force the kids to enter his house.

I plan to shoot anybody who enters my house. I have Glock 9mm about 5 feet from my bed in my window frame.

If someone broke in and I shot them, would it be premeditated murder?

I'm not defending his actions. What he did was criminal. However, I understand why he did it, and it was the direct result of others who were breaking into his house. But I wouldn't call it 1st degree murder.
 

1prophet

Diamond Member
Aug 17, 2005
5,313
534
126

brandonb

Diamond Member
Oct 17, 2006
3,731
2
0
Like a woman who is tired of being sexually assaulted so she dresses provocatively in order to attract the would be rapists, she then proceeds to shoot them dead when they attempt to assault her again, should she be found guilty of murder, because you know, she baited them?

Try again.
 
Jan 25, 2011
17,097
9,582
146
Right...

He didn't go to their house with plans to kill them. He was preparing to defend himself. He didn't force the kids to enter his house.

I plan to shoot anybody who enters my house. I have Glock 9mm about 5 feet from my bed in my window frame.

If someone broke in and I shot them, would it be premeditated murder?

I'm not defending his actions. What he did was criminal. However, I understand why he did it, and it was the direct result of others who were breaking into his house. But I wouldn't call it 1st degree murder.

No the threat was already neutralized. He dragged them after they were wounded and "finished them off" as he rehearsed. That is murder in the first degree when it is clearly established he planned and rehearsed the entire event.

The original thread on this incident.

http://forums.anandtech.com/showthread.php?t=2286153
 

AdamantC

Senior member
Apr 19, 2011
478
0
76
While I don't necessarily agree with what this guy did, I don't feel the least bit sorry for the two idiots that he killed.

You push someone hard enough and they're going to push back.
 

Sunburn74

Diamond Member
Oct 5, 2009
5,076
2,635
136
He rehearsed everything he would do and say after the shooting in his own recordings. That's not fear, that's premeditation.

I personally disagree with the ruling. If more people knew ahead of time they were going to be victims of home invasions where theft, assault, rape and murder are potential outcomes, we'd have a lot more good citizens still alive today.

No the threat was already neutralized. He dragged them after they were wounded and "finished them off" as he rehearsed. That is murder in the first degree when it is clearly established he planned and rehearsed the entire event.

The original thread on this incident.

http://forums.anandtech.com/showthread.php?t=2286153
I'm not sure that in a home invasion a home owner can ever say the threat was neutralized, at least until the police are there or the perps are dead. There's always the potential of a hidden weapon or an additional perp coming into play.
 
Last edited:

TheSiege

Diamond Member
Jun 5, 2004
3,918
14
81
I personally disagree with the ruling. If more people knew ahead of time they were going to be victims of home invasions where theft, assault, rape and murder are potential outcomes, we'd have a lot more good citizens still alive today.


I'm not sure that in a home invasion a home owner can ever say the threat was neutralized, at least until the police are there or the perps are dead. There's always the potential of a hidden weapon or an additional perp coming into play.

If you know that someone is going to commit a crime, you call the police, not become a vigilante. Regardless of where its taking place and to whom.
 
Feb 10, 2000
30,029
67
91
I live about 20 minutes from there. I disagree with the verdict in this case.

Kids were addicted to drugs and kept robbing this guy and stealing his pills (from what I understand from the locals, which I assume that evidence was suppressed in court)... So yes, he was expecting them because they were addicts needing a fix, and past history said they'd be back. He was waiting for them and killed them.

Should he have called the Police? Probably. But it's my opinion that your house is your sanctuary, and they were repeatedly violating it. They terrorized the old man to bring out that anger where he wanted the revenge. Who do you fault if someone repeatedly kicks a dog, and eventually the dog bites back? The dog or the person kicking it?

Negative. If he had simply shot them in self defense I doubt he would ever have been charged. While his initial shots at the male may have been justified, the rest of what occurred was deliberate, premeditated murder. These kids were engaged in some seriously bad, risky behavior but that is not a justification for murder.

As it happens I appeared before this judge week before last - I thought he was a bright and thoughtful guy. Glad to see the jury got this one right.
 

nehalem256

Lifer
Apr 13, 2012
15,669
8
0
I don't agree with the 1st degree murder charge.

The idea that you can bait someone into robbing your house so you can murder them is a tad ridiculous.

Seems to me that 2nd degree murder would be appropriate given that he clearly acted beyond self defense with the dragging the victim to another room to finish the job.
 

michal1980

Diamond Member
Mar 7, 2003
8,019
43
91
guy should have been sent free.

This jury basically excused the actions of the thugs robbing him.

IMHO, you break into someone's house, you lose all rights.
 

Attic

Diamond Member
Jan 9, 2010
4,282
2
76
If he set it up and planned it, which it sounds like he did, this sounds like the right outcome to me.

It does bother me that the kids set this in motion, but the killer was not justified for the course of action he took.
 

Genx87

Lifer
Apr 8, 2002
41,091
513
126
Clearly he was in the wrong. But I wont lose any sleep over two less shit bags in my state.
 

michal1980

Diamond Member
Mar 7, 2003
8,019
43
91
If he set it up and planned it, which it sounds like he did, this sounds like the right outcome to me.

It does bother me that the kids set this in motion, but the killer was not justified for the course of action he took.

why is this the right out come?

The two teens broke into his house. Did he force them into the house?

If no, then whatever. They are dead because they went somewhere they had no right being.
 
Last edited:
Feb 10, 2000
30,029
67
91
why is this the right out come?

The two teens broke into his house. Did he force them into the house?

If no, then whatever. They are dead because the went somewhere they had no right being.

Yes, they broke the law and were behaving very badly. That didn't give this shitbag the right to murder them in cold bloom.
 

Wordplay

Golden Member
Jun 28, 2010
1,318
1
81
If this guy shot them both dead and called the cops immediately, he would be free today.

Having recordings of your self sounding bat shit crazy hours before and after the incident, is pretty fucking stupid.
 

michal1980

Diamond Member
Mar 7, 2003
8,019
43
91
Yes, they broke the law and were behaving very badly. That didn't give this shitbag the right to murder them in cold bloom.

It should. He's not a shitbag.

These kids are, if they didn't break in, he wouldn't have done anything. They would still be alive.


But you'd rather defend the true thugs.