http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2014/04/29/minnesota-homeowner-kills-teens/8480047/
Looks like he baited them just so he could hill them.
Looks like he baited them just so he could hill them.
I live about 20 minutes from there. I disagree with the verdict in this case.
Kids were addicted to drugs and kept robbing this guy and stealing his pills (from what I understand from the locals, which I assume that evidence was suppressed in court)... So yes, he was expecting them because they were addicts needing a fix, and past history said they'd be back. He was waiting for them and killed them.
Should he have called the Police? Probably. But it's my opinion that your house is your sanctuary, and they were repeatedly violating it. They terrorized the old man to bring out that anger where he wanted the revenge. Who do you fault if someone repeatedly kicks a dog, and eventually the dog bites back? The dog or the person kicking it?
http://news.msn.com/crime-justice/minnesota-man-convicted-of-premeditated-murderAbout 10 minutes later, Kifer came downstairs. More shots are heard on the recording, then Kifer's screams, with Smith saying, "You're dying." It's followed soon after by another shot, which investigators said Smith described as "a good, clean finishing shot."
He rehearsed everything he would do and say after the shooting in his own recordings. That's not fear, that's premeditation.
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2014/04/29/minnesota-homeowner-kills-teens/8480047/
Looks like he baited them just so he could hill them.
Like a woman who is tired of being sexually assaulted so she dresses provocatively in order to attract the would be rapists, she then proceeds to shoot them dead when they attempt to assault her again, should she be found guilty of murder, because you know, she baited them?
Right...
He didn't go to their house with plans to kill them. He was preparing to defend himself. He didn't force the kids to enter his house.
I plan to shoot anybody who enters my house. I have Glock 9mm about 5 feet from my bed in my window frame.
If someone broke in and I shot them, would it be premeditated murder?
I'm not defending his actions. What he did was criminal. However, I understand why he did it, and it was the direct result of others who were breaking into his house. But I wouldn't call it 1st degree murder.
He rehearsed everything he would do and say after the shooting in his own recordings. That's not fear, that's premeditation.
I'm not sure that in a home invasion a home owner can ever say the threat was neutralized, at least until the police are there or the perps are dead. There's always the potential of a hidden weapon or an additional perp coming into play.No the threat was already neutralized. He dragged them after they were wounded and "finished them off" as he rehearsed. That is murder in the first degree when it is clearly established he planned and rehearsed the entire event.
The original thread on this incident.
http://forums.anandtech.com/showthread.php?t=2286153
I personally disagree with the ruling. If more people knew ahead of time they were going to be victims of home invasions where theft, assault, rape and murder are potential outcomes, we'd have a lot more good citizens still alive today.
I'm not sure that in a home invasion a home owner can ever say the threat was neutralized, at least until the police are there or the perps are dead. There's always the potential of a hidden weapon or an additional perp coming into play.
I live about 20 minutes from there. I disagree with the verdict in this case.
Kids were addicted to drugs and kept robbing this guy and stealing his pills (from what I understand from the locals, which I assume that evidence was suppressed in court)... So yes, he was expecting them because they were addicts needing a fix, and past history said they'd be back. He was waiting for them and killed them.
Should he have called the Police? Probably. But it's my opinion that your house is your sanctuary, and they were repeatedly violating it. They terrorized the old man to bring out that anger where he wanted the revenge. Who do you fault if someone repeatedly kicks a dog, and eventually the dog bites back? The dog or the person kicking it?
If he set it up and planned it, which it sounds like he did, this sounds like the right outcome to me.
It does bother me that the kids set this in motion, but the killer was not justified for the course of action he took.
why is this the right out come?
The two teens broke into his house. Did he force them into the house?
If no, then whatever. They are dead because the went somewhere they had no right being.
Yes, they broke the law and were behaving very badly. That didn't give this shitbag the right to murder them in cold bloom.
