dan4patriots
Senior member
- May 6, 2011
- 294
- 0
- 0
i had a sony vaio with a 1.86 Ghz single core pentium m 1gb ram and an nvidia card with a 100gb hdd
I still upgrade my rig and my wife's rig. I don't go bleeding edge though nor do I overclock them. I just want stable, quiet rigs that I can throw a few hundred worth of hardware at every 3-4 years to keep them current. My wife's rig is due for an upgrade soon. I'm running a quad core Intel i7 with 8GB of RAM, a SSD, and a decent video card.
i just bought 16gb of ram for $60...in ~2000 my brother paid $1/mb!!!!
In May of 2006 I bought a Dell XPS with a core 2 duo 1.6 or something with 2 gig of RAM for $420. Still use that daily as my office PC and Media Center/DVR.
That wasn't quite 6 years ago, but close. Got my $420 out of it.
It's likely going to get swapped out for a 27" iMac depending on what happens with the Ivy Bridge updates later this spring.
This is something I would just like to have. Nothing serious, just a solid machine. I however, am using basically the system the OP posted as his machine from 6 years ago, lol. I am using a 3.0GHz Pentium D right now as my current workstation. 3GB of RAM. THe only saving grace is the RAID 0 SSD array I have of two sammy 64GB drives. Windows 7 says the drive score maxes out at 7.9, so it still screams right along and does what I need it to do for the most part. Why I haven't justified upgrading yet.
Yeah but in 2000, 128MB of RAM was "sufficient" and only the hardcore people were getting 256MB and 512MB in their machines at the time. At that time (2001 maybe?) I was using a PIII 350 with 128MB of RAM I think and I bought that used from the year before.
But I know what you mean, per MB now its PENNIES on what it used to be.
I always think about how cool it would be to go back in time 5 or even 10 years and show your past self what you have in the future. You'd blow your own mind.
Yeah its 10 times faster with 4 cores so effectively 40 times faster than the one you're using now with 64 times as much memory and disk drives without motors.
Your past self would shit himself.
You thought wrong I've replaced everything in my Mac Pro except for the power supply and the motherboard, I don't know where people get these stupid ideas from Macs are as upgradable as any computer.
Umm... from the NEWS. Last year I replaced a 1TB Hitachi HDD in an aluminum iMac with another 1TB Hitachi HDD. The original broken one had an Apple firmware and logo on the sticker, the replacement was a retail drive. It required suction cups and special tools but I transferred the thermal sensor and it worked great, but a quick glance online showed that the newer iMacs released earlier that same month now had thermal sensors integrated into the HDDs that required Apple firmware to communicate with and refused to boot without it.
No more off-the-shelf HDDs. Yes, work-arounds were discovered and people did put SSDs inside but Apple did try their best. I have no problem with proprietary SSDs in the MacBook Air and integrated HDD thermal sensors as long as they don't lock-out non-Apple parts like they do. They sued the makers of MBA SSD upgrades and the HDDs should work fine without the sensor (is used to manage/control acoustics).
AMD Opteron 170 @ 2.0GHz
2GB RAM
250GB SATA I hard drive
Nvidia 7800GT
This is something I would just like to have. Nothing serious, just a solid machine.
