Man spends 2 years in solitary after DWI arrest, no trial

[KlokWyze]

start with a few people. some will rage, most won't care. do it to more people. few will rage, majority won't give a shit. eventually you will get numb to the idea and not care at all. until it happens to you. your rights are being taken away right under your nose :sneaky:

I dont agree with your statements usually, but this is the correct attitude to have with both government and corporations. I found it funny that Google was protesting SOPA/PIPA, but they are just as untrustworthy as the government..... :hmm:

 

[gingermeggs]

I'd pull a tooth for $22 million.

Not quite as good as being a CEO at goldman and sachs............

 

[Humpy]

The DA who filed the charges and failed to bring the case to trial, leaving Slevin to rot, is Susana Martinez, the current governor of NM.

Her husband was an under sheriff that oversaw the Dona Ana county jail where Slevin was held.

Obviously, the responsible government officials will face no repercussions.

 

[davmat787]

The DA who filed the charges and failed to bring the case to trial, leaving Slevin to rot, is Susana Martinez, the current governor of NM.

Her husband was an under sheriff that oversaw the Dona Ana county jail where Slevin was held.

Obviously, the responsible government officials will face no repercussions.

I'm sure you are correct, and of course the taxpayer is on the hook for the settlement, which I am sure includes language that those persons can't be sued.

Thanks for the extra info on the case.

 

[monovillage]

Yep, it looks like the now Governor of New Mexico, Susana Martinez (Republican btw) was the D.A. for this guy when he was originally incarcerated. No wonder there hasn't been much out there about this case.

 

[WelshBloke]

On the plus side $22mil would pay for some shithot hit men.

 

[EagleKeeper]

That convinced federal jury to award him $22M. So yeah, I'm sure there is a compelling counter argument we just aren't hearing yet.

From the way the story is presented, he should be compensated.

However, the story only presents one side. His!
We are not told the other side on what the system thought was happening

 

[Gonad the Barbarian]

From the way the story is presented, he should be compensated.

However, the story only presents one side. His!
We are not told the other side on what the system thought was happening

WTF does it even matter? It would if this were a simple unconfirmed allegation, but it's well beyond that point. Are you saying there is some conceivable excuse for this?

 

[EagleKeeper]

No excuse; just do not like not knowing the full story,

Such being exposed can prevent other situations

 

[Gonad the Barbarian]

If that's your point I'm sorry I misread it.