Dinesh is a sleazy little troll so these charges come as no surprise.
This, folks, is a typical liberal text book play.
Dinesh is a sleazy little troll so these charges come as no surprise.
They also have a history of persecuting people who dont tow the company line.
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Andrews_Drake
This, folks, is a typical liberal text book play.![]()
This sounds similar to the Tom Delay case.
Man, a whole lot of butthurt over '2016: Obama's America'. Well, someday Obama might grow up to be a man and learn to defend himself. Until then he's got all you fart cuppers to do it for him.
Man, a whole lot of butthurt over '2016: Obama's America'. Well, someday Obama might grow up to be a man and learn to defend himself. Until then he's got all you fart cuppers to do it for him.
Nice apples to aardvarks comparison. How the NSA deals with a whistleblower vs something else entirely.
Obviously a liberal conspiracy of oppression, like everything else, right?
This. Clinton had several Chinese and Indonesian donors like this, and had they not fled the country they almost certainly would have been prosecuted even though their benefactor was President. This is not selective prosecution, it is common practice.I think the question boils down to is it actually trumped up? If he really funneled the $20,000 in donations through third parties, than he should be punished. Of course, I would like to see EVERYONE who does this punished, but that is for another topic.
The allegation was this never happens and that we were all paranoid.
Clearly false. He certainly wasn't guilty of a crime, they spent enough time on him to convict 5 real criminals.
The allegation was this never happens and that we were all paranoid.
Clearly false. He certainly wasn't guilty of a crime, they spent enough time on him to convict 5 real criminals.
There you go again, putting on the little dictator hat. It does fit you well, but I don't have to listen.I believe this thread is about right wing butthurt & whining over imaginary liberal conspiracies of oppression. Check the OP, OK?
Possibly, but as he's a member of the 1% club, it's unlikely.No he needs to release it.....
Probably will need the money for his legal defense and to pay the fines if found guilty.
"SELECTIVE' CHARGES?"
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...nti-obama-documentary-indicted-for-violating/
Pretty sad state of affairs when someone can't be critical of the president without being locked up for it.
Man, a whole lot of butthurt over '2016: Obama's America'. Well, someday Obama might grow up to be a man and learn to defend himself. Until then he's got all you fart cuppers to do it for him.
There you go again, putting on the little dictator hat. It does fit you well, but I don't have to listen.
Do you have any evidence whatsoever that this case is one of a trumped up prosecution?
Like, any at all?
Which has absolutely nothing to do with D'Souza. Zero, zip, nothing, nada, zilch. The situations are entirely different.
Well, other than accusations of Conspiracy! and Oppression!
If it's trumped up prosecution, he can tell it to the jury.
"SELECTIVE' CHARGES?"
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...nti-obama-documentary-indicted-for-violating/
Pretty sad state of affairs when someone can't be critical of the president without being locked up for it.
Regardless guys does anyone really believe that foreign money isn't making it into some of the numerous super PAC's? Everyone's goal should be to remove money from voting and politics.
