C-SPAN was showing the Republican Party Platform Committee meeting on my lunchbreak. Just as I was leaving to head back to work they started discussing stem-cell research. Wish I could have heard that portion.Originally posted by: Darkhawk28
Too bad this country has its collective head up its arse about stem cell research.
Originally posted by: Darkhawk28
Too bad this country has its collective head up its arse about stem cell research.
Originally posted by: Piano Man
Originally posted by: Darkhawk28
Too bad this country has its collective head up its arse about stem cell research.
Although I agree with you, its not clear whether blank slate stem cells created the bone.
Originally posted by: Darkhawk28
Too bad this country has its collective head up its arse about stem cell research.
The information was used to create a thin titanium micro-mesh cage. Several cow-derived pure bone mineral blocks the size of sugar lumps where then put inside the structure, along with a human growth factor that builds bone and a large squirt of blood extracted from the man's bone marrow, which contains stem cells.
Originally posted by: CycloWizard
Originally posted by: Darkhawk28
Too bad this country has its collective head up its arse about stem cell research.
This isn't the area of stem cells that is being debated.
The information was used to create a thin titanium micro-mesh cage. Several cow-derived pure bone mineral blocks the size of sugar lumps where then put inside the structure, along with a human growth factor that builds bone and a large squirt of blood extracted from the man's bone marrow, which contains stem cells.
Adult stem cells, which were used in this procedure, are fine to use by anyone's standard. Embryonic stem cells, which are those that are controversial, have not been shown to successfully treat any malady or be instrumental in tissue engineering. In fact, most often they grow into clumps of many different types of tissue (hair, teeth, bones, and skin) when implanted into brain tumors or other 'trouble spots' for experimentation.
Originally posted by: maluckey
Embryonic stem cells don't work on many medical issues, wheras adult stem cells are already used to treat many problems. So why support the ones that haven't proven to be useful?
Adult stem cell information and sucessess.
Please note that embryonic stem cells, to-date, are not the miracle cure that they were thought to be.
Actually you and your sources are mistaken. Yes, indeed there have been successes with adult stem cells but few impartial observers believe adult stem cells have the POTENTIAL of embryonic stem cells.Originally posted by: maluckey
Embryonic stem cells don't work on many medical issues, wheras adult stem cells are already used to treat many problems. So why support the ones that haven't proven to be useful?
Adult stem cell information and sucessess.
Please note that embryonic stem cells, to-date, are not the miracle cure that they were thought to be.
Originally posted by: maluckey
BaliBabyDoc<BR><BR><a target=_blank class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="https:/http://www.gene-watch.org/educ...ell_myths.pdf">Good unbiased info showing that adult stem cells have more promise than thought..</a><BR><BR>For every site pro-embryonic stem cell research, I find two others that state it may not be needed at all. Most of the stem cell sites are in agreement that adult stem cell research is in it's infancy. Why distract yourself and your resources running to something else before the promise of what you have is fully explored. An intense, methodical, and thorough approach to adult stem cells should be pursued, so long as embryonic stem cell research is frowned upon.<BR><BR>tss4<BR> <BR>In reality, fusion has been proven to work. You are alive because of it. It is only a theory that embryonic stem cells can even do what they hope. I'm not against research. Neither was Mengele, but does the need to know outweigh the humanity lost? I'm not talking about the cells, but the slope after that which has not been addressed. It's like a non-swimmer standing on a diving board that is covered in ice. He is going on about how warm his feet will feel with his newly discovered wonder socks, and that the icy diving board is a wonderful test platform for his theory.......Perhaps he should first address the water below?
Originally posted by: tss4
<blockquote>quote:
<hr><i>Originally posted by: <b>maluckey</b></i>
BaliBabyDoc<BR><BR><a target=_blank class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="https:/<a target=_blank class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://www.gene-watch.org/educ...pdf">Good</a> unbiased info showing that adult stem cells have more promise than thought..</a><BR><BR>For every site pro-embryonic stem cell research, I find two others that state it may not be needed at all. Most of the stem cell sites are in agreement that adult stem cell research is in it's infancy. Why distract yourself and your resources running to something else before the promise of what you have is fully explored. An intense, methodical, and thorough approach to adult stem cells should be pursued, so long as embryonic stem cell research is frowned upon.<BR><BR>tss4<BR> <BR>In reality, fusion has been proven to work. You are alive because of it. It is only a theory that embryonic stem cells can even do what they hope. I'm not against research. Neither was Mengele, but does the need to know outweigh the humanity lost? I'm not talking about the cells, but the slope after that which has not been addressed. It's like a non-swimmer standing on a diving board that is covered in ice. He is going on about how warm his feet will feel with his newly discovered wonder socks, and that the icy diving board is a wonderful test platform for his theory.......Perhaps he should first address the water below?<hr></blockquote>
Fusion has not succesfully been demonstrated by man in a sustained self sustaining cycle. If you want to point to the sun as proof of the miracle of fusion then I will point to the fact that you live as proof to the miracle of embryonic stem cells. But we know till we do research.
As for the slippery slope arguement. Why wouldn't you apply that to fusion as well? How is it any different. Fusion has the potential to unleash enough energy to destroy the planet? We do research to make progress and we evaluate and responsibly use the results of them. If knowledge is so scary why don't we start burning books as well?
And fusion doesn't require the consumption of human embryos to procede with research.Originally posted by: tss4
Fusion has not succesfully been demonstrated by man in a sustained self sustaining cycle. If you want to point to the sun as proof of the miracle of fusion then I will point to the fact that you live as proof to the miracle of embryonic stem cells. But we know till we do research.
As for the slippery slope arguement. Why wouldn't you apply that to fusion as well? How is it any different. Fusion has the potential to unleash enough energy to destroy the planet? We do research to make progress and we evaluate and responsibly use the results of them. If knowledge is so scary why don't we start burning books as well?
Fusion has not succesfully been demonstrated by man in a sustained self sustaining cycle. If you want to point to the sun as proof of the miracle of fusion then I will point to the fact that you live as proof to the miracle of embryonic stem cells. But we know till we do research.
