(Man) Jailed for life over (forcing) underage (girls to perform) cybersex

[Texashiker]

Does the punishment fit the crime?

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-pacific-13356721

The heart of the article is

Police found 17 naked Filipinas in front of computer screens, some of them under-age.

They were described as having been forced into performing cybersex.

So, does someone deserve life in prison for cybersex, or having underaged girls preform cybersex?

Title edited - words in parentheses added - to reflect reality rather than sensationalism.
admin allisolm

 

[smartpatrol]

Nice misleading thread title.

 

[Joseph F]

Nice misleading thread title.

Indeed.

 

[classy]

Nice misleading thread title.

Agreed.
They forced underage girls into sexual acts. Prison is where they belong and life sounds good to me.

 

[Apple Of Sodom]

Does the punishment fit the crime?

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-pacific-13356721

The heart of the article is



So, does someone deserve life in prison for cybersex, or having underaged girls preform cybersex?

Yes. Any sexual act with children (or even legal adults that are forced into it) should be life in prison. We do need to look at age of consent though...

Did the person know they were underage and/or slaves? Or was this bad luck akin to hooking up at a party only to find out the girl wasn't 19, she is 16?

 

[SirStev0]

Agreed.
They forced underage girls into sexual acts. Prison is where they belong and life sounds good to me.

This.

I was coming in to defend people using the internet as an outlet for deviant sexual fetishes. What I found was online pimping of children. Not the same thing.

 

[dabuddha]

Agreed.
They forced underage girls into sexual acts. Prison is where they belong and life sounds good to me.

Stupid thread title. You should rewrite it OP.

 

[CVSiN]

thread fail.. they deserve what they got.. Sexual slavery via the internet is still sexual slavery.. and said there were a few well underage.. lock em up..

 

[Texashiker]

Stupid thread title. You should rewrite it OP.

The word "underage" has been added to the title. I thought the title was fine like it was.

People saw the title, and entered the thread with a certain mindset.

So dont hate on me for jumping to conclusions without the reading the whole story.

 

[OCGuy]

Fail thread

 

[DisgruntledVirus]

The word "underage" has been added to the title. I thought the title was fine like it was.

People saw the title, and entered the thread with a certain mindset.

So dont hate on me for jumping to conclusions without the reading the whole story.

...

Effing idiot.

 

[GeekDrew]

Thread title should be "Adults jailed for life over forcing minors to cybersex". The thread title is very misleading.

 

[smartpatrol]

WTF now it's "Jailed for life over underage cybersex"?

That's even more misleading. It was for running a business that forced underage girls to perform cybersex for money.

What a stupid thread.

 

[TheVrolok]

I was coming in to defend people using the internet as an outlet for deviant sexual fetishes. What I found was online pimping of children. Not the same thing.

^^^. Misleading thread title is misleading.

 

[AstroManLuca]

I dunno, maybe sexual slave labor and kidnapping would be more accurate terms to describe this.

Not that this would matter to OP, he is a troll.

 

[CVSiN]

The word "underage" has been added to the title. I thought the title was fine like it was.

People saw the title, and entered the thread with a certain mindset.

So dont hate on me for jumping to conclusions without the reading the whole story.

Your reading comprehensions FAILS.

first sentence of the article..

A court in the southern Philippines found Bo Stefan Sederholm, 31, and Emil Andreas Solemo, 35, guilty of trafficking charges.

SEXUAL TRAFFICKING and SEXUAL SLAVERY.. far different than Cybersex charges..

 

[DisgruntledVirus]

Your reading comprehensions FAILS.

first sentence of the article..

A court in the southern Philippines found Bo Stefan Sederholm, 31, and Emil Andreas Solemo, 35, guilty of trafficking charges.

SEXUAL TRAFFICKING and SEXUAL SLAVERY.. far different than Cybersex charges..

But he didn't read the whole story!!!! It's not his fault!!!

 

[Texashiker]

This.

I was coming in to defend people using the internet as an outlet for deviant sexual fetishes. What I found was online pimping of children. Not the same thing.

You entered this thread to defend cybersex because you jumped to conclusions from reading only the title.

Next time read the whole post before you jump to conclusions.

 

[Texashiker]

Your reading comprehensions FAILS.

.

Did you read the title of the article?

 

[AstroManLuca]

You entered this thread to defend cybersex because you jumped to conclusions from reading only the title.

Next time read the whole post before you jump to conclusions.

So what you're saying is as the OP you aren't required to make your thread title have anything to do with the actual subject at hand? You'll even go so far as to make an intentionally misleading thread title?

Next thing you'll probably tell us this was all a "social experiment" to see how many people would actually read the article.

 

[Krazy4Real]

Your thread title sucks. Yes, they deserve what they got. They were running the operation.

 

[smartpatrol]

In honor of how shitty this thread is, I propose a question:

Where did you take the biggest shit of your life?

Mine was in the Dominican Republic. I wish I could've taken a picture.

 

[DisgruntledVirus]

You entered this thread to defend cybersex because you jumped to conclusions from reading only the title.

Please explain what is wrong with cybersex. I'll wait.

Next time read the whole post before you jump to conclusions.

So let me get this straight. If you don't read the article before posting a misleading thread, that's ok and don't blame you for it. If another person reads the misleading thread title and goes to make a response based on that, then he is wrong?

Did you read the title of the article?

Did you read the article or, because you had to suffer through the Texas education system, just couldn't read past the title?

 

[SirStev0]

You entered this thread to defend cybersex because you jumped to conclusions from reading only the title.

Next time read the whole post before you jump to conclusions.

The point of the title is to give a quick synopsis of what you should expect to be discussed in the thread. I came in thinking I was going to go into a certain topic of discussion.

What was presented in the OP was not what was alluded to in the title. It was misleading. The title as it is now " Jailed for life over underage cybersex" is misleading as well.

Should be "Cyber sex slave ring busted. Scumbags get what was deserved."
This isn't cybersex. This is prostitution and slavery. Big difference.

 

[7window]

The question is what the swedes would do in their country if they caught some guys doing the same thing to their young girls?