Man, He got pissed

DaShen

Lifer
Dec 1, 2000
10,710
1
0
10 minute Diatribe

Hahaha... just look at the guy's reaction. :thumbsup:

You may not agree with the estimation, but at least the look on the interviewer's face is priceless. Reminds me of when Reagan beat the living crap out of Rather on live television (figuratively, of course). ;)

WRONG FORUM
 

SaltBoy

Diamond Member
Aug 13, 2001
8,975
11
81
I don't think I want to be President. You can't win, no matter what.
 

lokiju

Lifer
May 29, 2003
18,526
5
0
Thanks for posting this, I was wondering what this was about since I saw a news brief about this yesterday but never got to see the actual showing.

 

ch33zw1z

Lifer
Nov 4, 2004
39,470
20,151
146
Now would you rather someone like Clinton or Bush, imagine Bush speaking w/o someone writing for him...
 

frankgomez75

Platinum Member
Mar 23, 2004
2,215
1
81
Originally posted by: yowolabi
For those of us who can't access youtube at work, what is the video of?


President Bill Clinton being interviewed about Osama Bin Laden and him not doing anything about it. But Bill being the savvy guy he is owns the guy.

He admits he screwed up but he tried.
Man being president is enormously difficult... being constantly criticized no matter what you do.
 

Amused

Elite Member
Apr 14, 2001
57,117
18,646
146
Me thinks he doth protest too much.

Sorry, but getting over emotional won't sell your case to me any better.

That anyone thinks a tirade proves someone's case simply proves the point that his "slick" nickname fits him well.
 

lokiju

Lifer
May 29, 2003
18,526
5
0
I've never seen him so pissy before.

I understand him getting defensive but he is the ex-pres and all, I would have thought him to be more composed than this.


"you know I've never criticized president Bush"

But moments before he did just that multiple times.

 

DainBramaged

Lifer
Jun 19, 2003
23,454
41
91
Originally posted by: Amused
Me thinks he doth protest too much.

Sorry, but getting over emotional won't sell your case to me any better.

That anyone thinks a tirade proves someone's case simply proves the point that his "slick" nickname fits him well.

lol
 

Amused

Elite Member
Apr 14, 2001
57,117
18,646
146
?Reliable Sources? Panel Rips Clinton?s 'Fox News Sunday' Tirade

When a panel comprised of newly ultra-liberal Arianna Huffington, Bloomberg political correspondent Roger Simon, former Bush speechwriter David Frum, and the Washington Post?s Howard Kurtz unanimously believes you blew it, the likelihood is you did. Such was the case when the aforementioned gathered on CNN?s ?Reliable Sources? Sunday to chat about former president Bill Clinton?s meltdown on ?Fox News Sunday.?

Here are some of the notable quotables:

HUFFINGTON: Well, I don't know what the private arrangements were about what he could talk about and he could not. But frankly, once you go on the television show, you should know if you're the president of the United States, or the former president, or me, or anybody else, that you can be asked anything at all.

FRUM: I just went through the transcript and counted half a dozen urgings to people to go read Richard Clarke's book. It's a wonderful Washington moment. Here's this national best- seller, and he knows no one in Washington has in fact read it, because if you do it's a damning portrait of the Clinton administration.

SIMON: I think what his answer shows is that he believes, as his wife once famously said, there is a vast right wing conspiracy out to get the Clinton. That may be true. I'm not sure Chris Wallace is part of it, however. I think Chris Wallace was simply acting like a newsman.

KURTZ: And therefore, it would seem that, Arianna, that the former president just went overboard. I mean, it wasn't like a question -- it wasn't a personal question. It was a question about his record as president. What's wrong with that?

FRUM: Arianna's right, he's not a very convincing statesman.

What follows is a full transcript of this segment.

KURTZ: Welcome back to RELIABLE SOURCES.

"FOX News Sunday aired an interview with Bill Clinton about an hour ago. Host Chris Wallace asked the former president about his record on terrorism which resulted in a long, impassioned answer that eventually turned into an attack on Chris Wallace.

Let's watch some of that.

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

CHRIS WALLACE, "FOX NEWS SUNDAY": Why didn't you do more to put bin Laden and al Qaeda out of business when you were president?

WILLIAM JEFFERSON CLINTON, FMR. PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES: So you did FOX's bidding on the show. You did your nice little conservative hit job on me. What I want to know is...

WALLACE: Well, wait a minute, sir. I'm asking the question.

CLINTON: No, wait. No, no.

WALLACE: You don't think that's a legitimate question?

CLINTON: It was a perfectly legitimate question, but I want to know how many people in the Bush administration you asked this question of.

WALLACE: Do you ever watch "FOX News Sunday," sir?

CLINTON: I don't believe you asked them that.

WALLACE: We ask plenty of questions.

CLINTON: You didn't ask that, did you? Tell the truth, Chris. Tell the truth, Chris.

WALLACE: With Iraq and Afghanistan, there's plenty of stuff to ask, sir.

CLINTON: Did you ever ask that? You set this meeting up because -- you're going to get a lot of criticism from your viewers, because Rupert Murdoch is supporting my work on climate change. And you came here under false pretenses and said that you'd spend half the time talking about -- you said you'd spend half the time talking about what we did out there to raise $7 billion-plus in three days from 215 different commitments, and you don't care.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

KURTZ: That was quite an answer. We saw just a part of that. Clinton was also talking about Richard Clarke, the former counterterrorism official, and why supposedly Chris Wallace had hadn't asked Republicans about that.

Arianna Huffington, was it unfair for Chris Wallace to ask about Clinton's record on terrorism? And why did he fly off the handle on that?

HUFFINGTON: Well, I don't know what the private arrangements were about what he could talk about and he could not. But frankly, once you go on the television show, you should know if you're the president of the United States, or the former president, or me, or anybody else, that you can be asked anything at all.

What this may lead to which could be good news is that Bill Clinton may wake up to the fact that there is a real (INAUDIBLE) going on to define who is going keep America safer. And for him to try to have it both ways, to have Laura Bush do the keynote during his conference, as though we're all in this together, to have Rupert Murdoch, Chris Wallace' ultimate boss, do the fund-raiser for his wife, all that stuff is simply not making it as clear and as distinct as it to needs to be for the American people.

There are two very different views, and there should be leading up to the '06 election, about who is going to keep America safer. And Bill Clinton needs to decide if he's just a former president or a former Democratic president helping his party define what is at stake in the upcoming election. So this may be a good wake-up call for him.

KURTZ: A good wake-up call for everybody who was watching.

Just to clarify to Arianna's point, FOX says that there was an agreement that half the interview would be spent on his global initiative, and -- but at one point Chris Wallace tried to get back to the global initiative and Clinton kept going on this issue of terrorism.

FRUM: It looks like -- if you look at the transcript, it looks like about half to me.

I'll tell you, if I'm ever summoned to the vice principal's office, Bill Clinton is the guy I want next to me. I mean, what a filibuster and what amazing effrontery. I just went through the transcript and counted half a dozen urgings to people to go read Richard Clarke's book.

It's a wonderful Washington moment. Here's this national best- seller, and he knows no one in Washington has in fact read it, because if you do it's a damning portrait of the Clinton administration.

KURTZ: But why do you say effrontery? I mean, shouldn't the former president be able to defend himself forcefully, emotionally, as to Clinton's style, on this issue of what he did or didn't do on terrorism?

FRUM: Of course he should. Of course he should.

But to say, go read this book that says I did a did a great job when the book -- now, the beginning and end, because Clarke is personally loyal to Clinton, gave Clinton all kind of points, but when you read the actual substantive story, at one point, you know, Clarke comes out of a meeting with Clinton officials and says, "What is it going take wake this country up? Is al Qaeda going to have to smash a plane into the Pentagon?" And that's during the Clinton years.

Again and again, Clinton says, "I want to do something, but the CIA won't let me, the FBI won't let me." And this is the Richard Clarke's story, all in the book that Clinton kept telling them to read, counting on them not to.

KURTZ: We can debate Clinton's record on terrorism for hours.

What I want to know, Roger Simon, is, was he particularly sensitive maybe about being asked this on FOX News, where he's never before done a one-on-one interview? He brings in Rupert Murdoch and conservative (INAUDIBLE).

What do you think?

SIMON: Well, a couple of things. One, I think we've seen, as if we ever doubted, that making yourself available to the media is not the same thing as liking the media. And Bill Clinton still does not like the media, number one.

And number two, I think what his answer shows is that he believes, as his wife once famously said, there is a vast right wing conspiracy out to get the Clinton. That may be true. I'm not sure Chris Wallace is part of it, however. I think Chris Wallace was simply acting like a newsman.

KURTZ: And therefore, it would seem that, Arianna, that the former president just went overboard. I mean, it wasn't like a question -- it wasn't a personal question. It was a question about his record as president.

What's wrong with that?

HUFFINGTON: I mean, I actually like that kind of feisty Bill Clinton more than I like the one who congratulates the president on his handling of Katrina or lets Republicans get away on what is happening in Iraq. I prefer the feisty Bill Clinton.

KURTZ: All right.

HUFFINGTON: I mean, there's a -- there's a campaign going on.


FRUM: Arianna's right, he's not a very convincing statesman.

KURTZ: But he's always an interesting interview subject. Maybe he'll come on this show some time.

Thank you very much, David Frum, Arianna Huffington, Roger Simon.
 

Ryan

Lifer
Oct 31, 2000
27,519
2
81
Clinton ripped him a new asshole, and deservingly so. It's nice to see a man who can admit that he tried and failed.
 

Baked

Lifer
Dec 28, 2004
36,052
17
81
This interview's done on Fox News, would you have expected anything less from Clinton?
 

Amused

Elite Member
Apr 14, 2001
57,117
18,646
146
Anyone remember the last time Clinton wagged his finger at reporters and threw a fit...

Oh yeah, it's when he lied his ass off.

Sorry, guys, but the conspiracy claims, finger wagging, pointing and 'smirk' comments were downright frightening.
 

UDT89

Diamond Member
Jul 31, 2001
4,529
0
76
Originally posted by: Ryan
Clinton ripped him a new asshole, and deservingly so. It's nice to see a man who can admit that he tried and failed.


wow, you really believe him? read richard clarke's book, its a good read and it makes you realize both bush and clinton sucked equally. clinton just had the benefit of being in office during the internet boom.

http://www.slate.com/id/2097803/

What Clinton Did Wrong
Page 225: Went too easy on the CIA. "He had given the CIA unprecedented authority to go after bin Laden personally and Al Qaeda, but had not taken steps when they did little or nothing." (Clarke, however, goes pretty easy on Clinton for this failing: "Because Clinton was criticized as a Vietnam War opponent without a military record, he was limited in his ability to direct the military to engage in anti-terrorist commando operations.")

Page 131: Didn't always push hard enough for homeland protection measures. In 1996, Clarke championed a plan for "a permanent air defense unit to protect Washington." Despite Clarke's efforts, Clinton's Treasury Department refused to OK it. "Most people who heard about our efforts to create some air defense system in case terrorists tried to fly aircraft into the Capitol, the White House, or the Pentagon simply thought we were nuts."
 

ForumMaster

Diamond Member
Feb 24, 2005
7,792
1
0
clinton owned that guy. he admited that he failed which is something bush would never do. he argues before that guy without a script and he is correct imo.
 

d3n

Golden Member
Mar 13, 2004
1,597
0
0
Originally posted by: UDT89
Originally posted by: Ryan
Clinton ripped him a new asshole, and deservingly so. It's nice to see a man who can admit that he tried and failed.


wow, you really believe him? read richard clarke's book, its a good read and it makes you realize both bush and clinton sucked equally. clinton just had the benefit of being in office during the internet boom.

http://www.slate.com/id/2097803/

What Clinton Did Wrong
Page 225: Went too easy on the CIA. "He had given the CIA unprecedented authority to go after bin Laden personally and Al Qaeda, but had not taken steps when they did little or nothing." (Clarke, however, goes pretty easy on Clinton for this failing: "Because Clinton was criticized as a Vietnam War opponent without a military record, he was limited in his ability to direct the military to engage in anti-terrorist commando operations.")

Page 131: Didn't always push hard enough for homeland protection measures. In 1996, Clarke championed a plan for "a permanent air defense unit to protect Washington." Despite Clarke's efforts, Clinton's Treasury Department refused to OK it. "Most people who heard about our efforts to create some air defense system in case terrorists tried to fly aircraft into the Capitol, the White House, or the Pentagon simply thought we were nuts."


I remember this. I think it was actually highlighted by a Tom Clancy novel debt of honor.
 

Amused

Elite Member
Apr 14, 2001
57,117
18,646
146
Originally posted by: ForumMaster
clinton owned that guy. he admited that he failed which is something bush would never do. he argues before that guy without a script and he is correct imo.

Clinton owned himself. He looked like a nutball and wagged his finger just like he did when he lied about Lewinsky. Not only that, but he rehashed the "vast right wing conspiracy" craziness.

Yep, he owned himself.
 

Red Dawn

Elite Member
Jun 4, 2001
57,529
3
0
Originally posted by: Amused
Me thinks he doth protest too much.
LOL me think you protest too much, you made 4 posts trying to convince us not to believe our "lying ears and eyes":laugh:. You should stick with posting about your weight lifting prowess and posting those two pics of yourself posing in the mirror.
 

JS80

Lifer
Oct 24, 2005
26,271
7
81
Originally posted by: CombatChuk
Originally posted by: yowolabi
For those of us who can't access youtube at work, what is the video of?

Bill Clinton turns purple Fox News because they asked him about how he decided not to kill bin laden like 20 times because it was "illegal" and he goes off on how it's a Right Wing Conspirasaaaaa run by Cartman

 

JS80

Lifer
Oct 24, 2005
26,271
7
81
Originally posted by: Ryan
Clinton ripped him a new asshole, and deservingly so. It's nice to see a man who can admit that he tried and failed.

you love that imagery, especially by your god, don't you?