Doc Savage Fan
Lifer
- Nov 30, 2006
- 15,456
- 389
- 121
Phokus, that is incredibly profound! I always find these "revelations" of yours to be a very fitting reflection of your intellectual acuity.Conservativism is a mental disease
Phokus, that is incredibly profound! I always find these "revelations" of yours to be a very fitting reflection of your intellectual acuity.Conservativism is a mental disease
Oh really? You sound as if you think I'm lying. And all this time I thought you knew me better than that. Somehow I feel disappointed on several levels.
Phokus, that is incredibly profound! I always find these "revelations" of yours to be a very fitting reflection of your intellectual acuity.
Well then...I must thank you for taking my word for it. You're more than gracious.Your disappointment is self induced. I just said I see no problem with what you found funny and believe you when you say that's what you found funny. How you turned that into an implication I think you are lying is fucking beyond me.
It also indicated that the system is broken. They now let mentally ill people own guns beside the trigger happy nut jobs.Stupid post is stupid. Learn to read, learn to reason, learn where to post. Foolish ignorance belongs in P&N.
Edit: Forgot to mention, your title is wrong as well. The article clearly states the man was mentally ill.
Well then...I must thank you for taking my word for it. You're more than gracious.
You poor poor deluded fool. The science that you say was debunked you debunked like the church debunked Galileo. The science says that conservatives deny science when it conflicts with their delusions, and that the more the science is proven right the more conservatives deny it. You wouldn't know what debunked is even when it bites you in the ass.
But I will look at any scientific evidence from scientists that says what I've said is bunk. Good luck with that. Scientific evidence only please. And please do give me the evidence because you know what's at stake. It will mean that I am on God height and you're the worst piece of shit on the planet if you can't. You have got to prove me wrong or you're nothing. Everything you believe, everything that's good, your god and your religion, all in the toilet, so get busy.
I did not see this debunking. Usually the person claiming dumbunking actually debunks things?
The burden of proof is on him. He is quoting a study of 1500 College Grad students and using it as representative of our entire nation. That automatically leaves out 75% of the population due to the fact that only 25% of our workforce ever graduates college. Do you see anyone else using the same Brain Defect lines Moonie uses? No. They are hogwash. I thoroughly stumped him the other day asking if one side has a brain defect and they switch political sides, do they take that brain defect with them? Still waiting for him to get back to me on that
The burden of proof is on him. He is quoting a study of 1500 College Grad students and using it as representative of our entire nation. That automatically leaves out 75% of the population due to the fact that only 25% of our workforce ever graduates college. Do you see anyone else using the same Brain Defect lines Moonie uses? No. They are hogwash. I thoroughly stumped him the other day asking if one side has a brain defect and they switch political sides, do they take that brain defect with them? Still waiting for him to get back to me on that
Matt1970
I'm going to go out on a limb here and say you're not a scientist, let alone someone who understands statistics and sampling methods.
PS - Having a degree in math and having taken probability, statistics, numerical analysis, etc, I will tell you 1500 people in any study is a freaking awesome sample regardless of any predisposition. You only really need a sample of 377 to get 95% +- 5% accuracy. At the very least you could probably add some error factor to the conclusion, but I doubt you would be able to directly dumbunk it without doing an equal or greater study.
Then you should know that you don't go after a 25% group saying it is representative of our entire nation. A study like this is already biased to begin with so don't you think they are going to pick a sub-group to fit their needs?
It depends on the sample. Where did the sample come from? They would have stated this in the study.
Your better offense/defense would be move away from statistics and focus on how speculations are being called facts.
Sad that no one else is willing to report the reason the man did this.
Then you should know that you don't go after a 25% group saying it is representative of our entire nation. A study like this is already biased to begin with so don't you think they are going to pick a sub-group to fit their needs?
Because its obvious, he did it because he was nuts.
Try to remember that you are basing what you consider obvious on the assumptions you make about truth. The notion that energy and mass are the same thing is obviously a lie. The notion that something can come from nothing is also obviously a lie. The real facts are, however, that these statements are true. The notion that you have unconscious motivations that influence your behavior and especially create denial, is also obviously false because you think you know what you're doing. The enemy of truth is being filled to the top with assumptions.
Its not that something comes from nothing. Even if the guy listened to RW hate speech 18 hours a day and it caused his paranoid delusions, fact remains clinically sane people dont murder based on such influence.
So we are left with cause and effect, was it his RW paranoia the cause of his actions or mental illness?
Since there are many RW paranoid idiots right here on thsi forum not murdering anyone that it was his mental illness.