Man arrested at airport for wearing too many clothes to avoid luggage fees

madoka

Diamond Member
Jun 22, 2004
4,344
712
121
I suppose those luggage fees were higher than whatever shame/embarrassment/discomfort he would feel taking a flight with 8 pants and 10 shirts on.

https://icelandmonitor.mbl.is/news/..._arrested_at_iceland_international_airport_f/

A tourist travelling from Iceland to England was arrested for wearing eight trousers and ten shirts. The reason he put on all his clothes was to evade a fee for excess luggage.

Mbl.is got hold of the tourist, Ryan Carney Williams who calls himself Ryan Hawaii the day that finally got back to England after having been refused entry to his plane twice. Media reported this weekend that Hawaii had been barred entry to his plane for having put on all his clothes and for rowdiness.

Hawaii was denied a boarding pass at the British Airways desk when he had put on all his clothes and was about to register for the flight. The reason given was that he was rude and he was asked to leave the flight desk and a security guard was called when he refused.

Finally, police were called to interfere and according to Hawaii they were violent towards him, using pepper spray and holding him to the ground. He tells mbl.is that he had been polite during all of this.

After giving a report to police he was sent back to the airport in a taxi which he had to pay for with money borrowed from his mum. The next day he had a flight booked back home with EasyJet. Check in went fine but when he arrived at the gate a man told him he wasn't allowed to board due to his behaviour the previous day. He was therefore stuck in Iceland without his luggage and without money. Hawaii has been in contact with British Airways and he's being refunded by them, and EasyJet have refunded him. Yesterday he was finally able to fly back using the Norwegian airline but his luggage is still stuck at another airport in England.

Hawaii believes his treatment was due to racial prejudice because he had dreadlocks, wore flashy clothes and nail polish.
 

Exterous

Super Moderator
Jun 20, 2006
20,568
3,760
126
Sounds like he was arrested for being an asshole - not for wearing too many clothes. It takes a fair bit of effort to get barred from two different airlines on back to back days
 

Paladin3

Diamond Member
Mar 5, 2004
4,933
878
126
OP needs to correct the thread title. Did you not even read the article you posted about?
 

madoka

Diamond Member
Jun 22, 2004
4,344
712
121
OP needs to correct the thread title. Did you not even read the article you posted about?

I've been banned for changing the title of articles before, so even though I disagree with how it was described, I kept to the original title as was in the article.

No, you haven't and no, you didn't keep to the title of the article you linked to.
admin allisolm
 
Last edited by a moderator:

purbeast0

No Lifer
Sep 13, 2001
53,580
6,423
126
Yeah the title is completely misleading, even if it's click bait on the actual article.

Sounds like this is just an "internet star" douchebag trying to get views for being a douchebag.
 

madoka

Diamond Member
Jun 22, 2004
4,344
712
121
What ass would do that?

Asses. . . it happened to me twice.

I also learned over the years, talking about mods outside of their private mod forum is a "mod callout" and I've been banned for that several times, including once for quoting what they said.

Wow. That's doubling down. Obviously you didn't retain what you learned. You can add one more to those "several times."
admin allisolm
 
Last edited by a moderator:

brandonbull

Diamond Member
May 3, 2005
6,363
1,222
126
Asses. . . it happened to me twice.

I also learned over the years, talking about mods outside of their private mod forum is a "mod callout" and I've been banned for that several times, including once for quoting what they said.

Sounds like you are talking about them.
 

BurnItDwn

Lifer
Oct 10, 1999
26,343
1,856
126
poor people avoid $100 baggage fee by wearing 30 pairs of pants.

Rich People avoid many thousands in taxes by wearing 100K worth of Jewelry to bring money into another country without bringing cash.
 

Svnla

Lifer
Nov 10, 2003
17,986
1,388
126
poor people avoid $100 baggage fee by wearing 30 pairs of pants.

Rich People avoid many thousands in taxes by wearing 100K worth of Jewelry to bring money into another country without bringing cash.

The hard thing is to converse those high end jewelry into USD and how to bring back those USD to the US.

I do not know it is possible to wear more than 2-3 full size pants at once. How the heck do you sit down?
 

BurnItDwn

Lifer
Oct 10, 1999
26,343
1,856
126
The hard thing is to converse those high end jewelry into USD and how to bring back those USD to the US.

I do not know it is possible to wear more than 2-3 full size pants at once. How the heck do you sit down?
Historically, I believe they usually would buy gold or high end watches in tax havens and then wear them back home to the US and then sell them for market value for cash. Essentially, the income would be invisible to the IRS.
 

Red Squirrel

No Lifer
May 24, 2003
70,334
13,668
126
www.anyf.ca
Wow how much are these fees? I think it's ridiculous how they nickel and dime you but seems to me it would not be worth doing that. I can't imagine how uncomfortable it would be, and all those clothes would now be dirty clothes by the time you get to your destination considering the sweat.

Seems odd to me that the airline gave him that much trouble though. I guess they really want their luggage fee money! I guess they see it the same way as the government sees tax evasion.
 

WelshBloke

Lifer
Jan 12, 2005
32,901
11,038
136
Seems odd to me that the airline gave him that much trouble though. I guess they really want their luggage fee money! I guess they see it the same way as the government sees tax evasion.

My guess is that he's fucking mental. Airlines are leary of letting obvious lunatics on their planes.
 
Mar 16, 2005
13,856
109
106
what if he was just protecting his body from a beatdown from the flight attendants?

there is precedence.