Majority of Middle East hates Jews, supports Hezbollah and Hamas

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

SamurAchzar

Platinum Member
Feb 15, 2006
2,422
3
76
2. Why was Lebanese dislike of Israel , particularly Lebanese Christian dislikes , higher for Lebanese when compared to the rest of the Arab world.

That's the only question I think I know the answer to - the Lebanese Christians probably felt betrayed by Israel after it left them to Hizballah when it retreated. Israel took many of the SLA (Southern Lebanon Army, Christian Lebanese) into Israel but they must have negative sentiments following that.

Even guys that used to fiercely oppose Hizballah and the Iranian intervention in Lebanon, now swapped sides - they know the balance of power (e.g. Hariri's son sucking up to Assad Jr.)
 

Jhhnn

IN MEMORIAM
Nov 11, 1999
62,365
14,681
136
How is this? If you compare the level of development in any Arab country compared to Israel, you'd see the development gap is huge. The only viable explanation to that is the cultural/mentality difference between Muslims and Israelis.
Why do you think a Palestinian state would be any different than any other Arab state? Would Israelis, living in one of the most advanced countries in the world, agree to live in a place resembling Syria or Egypt?

The Arabs in Israel are a minority. A very significant one (~20%), but they don't call the shots. What happens when they do, and again, why wouldn't it degenerate to the situation of all other Arab states?

What makes Israel non-secular in your eyes?

Israel is no less secular than the good ol' USA. Israel was built by a bunch of Leninists that completely ignored religion. Israelis dislike extremist Hassidic Jews just as much as they dislike Arabs, if not more. The law in Israel is based on the British mandate and carries no reference to Jewish justice (in stark contrast to Muslim Sharia laws). Most of the Israeli population is non-orthodox. So again, how is Israel a non-secular state?



While historically I can only agree with you, the question remains on what goes on from here. Mixing the populations is just as a bad idea as tearing down the border with Mexico (probably much worse). It's either you dismantle Israel or get to a two state solutions with no right of return.
Actually the best solution would just be Egypt and Jordan assuming responsibility over Gaza and West Bank respectively - after all it was their territory that was taken - but no one wants these hornet nests.

Development? The US and Europe have poured untold monies into the development of Israel both in public and private. Fewer than six million people were the recipients of that largesse. Per capita investment in the rest of the region, outside of KSA, has been miniscule. It hasn't helped neighboring countries that Israeli bombs fall out of the sky periodically, knocking down whatever they build, or that Israelis actively invade or destabilize their govts, pitting one faction against another, as in Lebanon.

As for the rest of it, particularly the whole secular basis of Israel, even you know you're lying-

http://israelinsider.ning.com/forum/topics/netanyahu-jewish-state-is-key

He *is* the Prime Minister of Israel, right?

Both Jordan and Egypt copped out wrt Gaza and the West Bank, leaving the Pals to attempt to work it out with the Israelis, who're basically not interested in working out anything, other than the expansion of their Jewish State, trading peace for territory every chance they've had since those copouts took place... both the west bank and gaza were part of a british mandate and a proposed independent palestine prior to 1948, anyway, neither Egyptian nor Jordanian.

Israelis withdrew from southern Lebanon after 10 years of occupation only because of extreme international pressure and the fact that it was more than they could reasonably handle in addition to Gaza and the West Bank... and didn't hesitate to reduce the habitability of the region with their recent campaign to mine it using cluster munitions... they didn't waste much time after the US forced the withdrawal of Syrian peacekeepers, and are probably disappointed that their efforts to provoke another civil war haven't been successful...

You're definitely a better propagandist than the OP, but it's all pretty facile and transparent...
 

fallout man

Golden Member
Nov 20, 2007
1,787
0
0
Past animosities between Israelis and Palestinians aside, what would it look like if you took predominately Muslim population and mixed it with any other group, in equal parts?

And specifically:
3. Will Muslim Arabs agree to live in a secular state?

lol_que.jpg
 

Noobtastic

Banned
Jul 9, 2005
3,721
0
0
so Jhhnn, I see you haven't responded to my total debunking of your original post one page ago. Care to respond?


Development? The US and Europe have poured untold monies into the development of Israel both in public and private.

So? Israel is #2 in venture capital per capita, 2nd only to the USA.

Ask Bill Gates, Warren Buffet, and Larry Ellison what they think of Israel and its industry.

And then ask them what they think of the Arab tribes and their economic competitiveness.

Fewer than six million people were the recipients of that largesse. Per capita investment in the rest of the region, outside of KSA, has been
miniscule.

Yes, cause Israel is a progressive economic state.

It hasn't helped neighboring countries that Israeli bombs fall out of the sky periodically, knocking down whatever they build, or that Israelis actively invade or destabilize their govts, pitting one faction against another, as in Lebanon.

Proof?



As for the rest of it, particularly the whole secular basis of Israel, even you know you're lying-

http://israelinsider.ning.com/forum/topics/netanyahu-jewish-state-is-key

He *is* the Prime Minister of Israel, right?

Being a Jewish state is the whole mandate of Israel. The original Etzel fighters saw a Jewish state with an Arab minority.

In the end the Jews are more progressive and tolerant than the irreligious leftists and the Islamist. Any attempt at dismantling the Jewishness of Israel would compromise the freedom it comes with, enabling hostile Muslims and Arabs to fill in the gaps.

That's exactly what happened in Egypt and Lebanon. Israel needs a Jewish identity to survive in such a terrible neighborhood.

Both Jordan and Egypt copped out wrt Gaza and the West Bank, leaving the Pals to attempt to work it out with the Israelis

Wrong. Jordan and Egypt left Gaza and the West Bank after Israel seized the land in a war they started. Jordan had already annexed the West Bank, and Gaza was used to launch thousands of attacks into Israel.


, who're basically not interested in working out anything, other than the expansion of their Jewish State, trading peace for territory every chance they've had since those copouts took place

Proof? Israel was offering to give back every inch of land with the exception of Jerusalem for a peaceful surrender. Israel agreed to a negotiated peace according to UN242, and the Arabs rejected the resolution - passing the 3 No's, and declaring a belligerent state of war even after they suffered the most humiliating defeat in their history.

Regardless, the land was never considered Palestinian - not even by the Palestinians.

Why didn't Egypt and Jordan create a Palestinian state? Tell me?




... both the west bank and gaza were part of a british mandate and a proposed independent palestine prior to 1948, anyway, neither Egyptian nor Jordanian.

Yes, and this was rejected by the Arabs. Jordan annexed the West Bank and Britain recognized it, and the UN said nothing.

Jordan is Palestine btw. Hashemites almost called their country Palestine, but the British told them not to.

What if Jordan today was Palestine?

What would we call Palestine then? West Palestine?


Israelis withdrew from southern Lebanon after 10 years of occupation only because of extreme international pressure and the fact that it was more than they could reasonably handle in addition to Gaza and the West Bank

For starters, Israel did not occupy southern Lebanon. The a team of 500 IDF soldiers sat on a sliver of land 15 kilometers inside Lebanon. They exerted zero control over the Lebanese government or people. The whole reasoning behind the presence was to deter attacks from Hezbollah, which were frequent. Israel withdrew only because the UN, US, and Europe promised Israel's security - and the UN resolution said all movements with Lebanon must disarm.

Of course Hezbollah didn't, and war started - even though not a single Israeli lived in Lebanon.





... and didn't hesitate to reduce the habitability of the region with their recent campaign to mine it using cluster munitions

Oh boohoo. You pick fights with the military superior, you get burned.

Israel doesn't fight like its critics. Maybe it should. Next time Lebanon won't be so lucky. The new government has allied itself with Hezbollah. During the last war Israel exclusively targeted Shia areas and made great attempts to avoid conflict with the Lebanese military.

In round 3, Israel won't differentiate between Lebanon and Hezbollah.

More target practice I guess. :D

... they didn't waste much time after the US forced the withdrawal of Syrian peacekeepers, and are probably disappointed that their efforts to provoke another civil war haven't been successful...

Syrian peacekeepers? LOL! What??????????


You're definitely a better propagandist than the OP, but it's all pretty facile and transparent...

And you're a fucking tool.
 

SamurAchzar

Platinum Member
Feb 15, 2006
2,422
3
76
Development? The US and Europe have poured untold monies into the development of Israel both in public and private.

All the combined external aid is still a fraction of the Israeli GDP - and don't forget this money is a drop in the ocean compared to what Israel had to spend to defend itself from Arab aggression during its existence.

Fewer than six million people were the recipients of that largesse. Per capita investment in the rest of the region, outside of KSA, has been miniscule.

Arabs had oil money, which Israel never had. It didn't help them one bit, as you see today.

It hasn't helped neighboring countries that Israeli bombs fall out of the sky periodically, knocking down whatever they build, or that Israelis actively invade or destabilize their govts, pitting one faction against another, as in Lebanon.

Your example of Lebanon is very good - if only because the Israeli invasion only came in after Lebanon willfully hosted the PLO who carried across-the-border attack on Northern Israel. So who's destabilizing who?

As for the rest of it, particularly the whole secular basis of Israel, even you know you're lying-

http://israelinsider.ning.com/forum/topics/netanyahu-jewish-state-is-key

He *is* the Prime Minister of Israel, right?

What's between that and religion? He never called for a religious Israeli state. You can be Jewish while being an Atheist (like I am), and many of the Israeli public are. It's not strictly religious (you don't have to believe in god to be Jewish) and it's not racial either (after all you can become a Jew if you want to convert).

who're basically not interested in working out anything, other than the expansion of their Jewish State,
trading peace for territory every chance they've had since those copouts took place...

You gotta be kidding, right?

And just for the irony of it, that thing is fucking THREE TIMES as big as Israel itself. How does this settle with the evil Zionist expansion plans? BTW Israel was completely suckered there, getting cold peace from Egypt, and essentially having US arming them to the teeth, in exchange for this magnificent piece of land. Hardly a good deal.

Yes, you are surely kidding.

Israelis withdrew from southern Lebanon after 10 years of occupation only because of extreme international pressure and the fact that it was more than they could reasonably handle in addition to Gaza and the West Bank...

18 years, 1982 until 2000. Do you know the reason this area was occupied in the first place?

and didn't hesitate to reduce the habitability of the region with their recent campaign to mine it using cluster munitions... they didn't waste much time after the US forced the withdrawal of Syrian peacekeepers, and are probably disappointed that their efforts to provoke another civil war haven't been successful...

So let me get this straight - US and Hizballah timed the Hizballah attack on Israeli soldiers for right after Syrian "peacekeepers" are withdrawn, all for starting a new civil war in Lebanon? I'd like to hear your account of the events, maybe I missed something.

(We'll later deal with the question of what the fuck does an Iranian controlled and sponsored, recognized terrorist organization do controlling one third of a sovereign nation)
 

Jhhnn

IN MEMORIAM
Nov 11, 1999
62,365
14,681
136
So, uhh, Judaism isn't a religion, but rather an ethnicity? Which makes Israeli policy not one that discriminates on the basis of religion, but on the basis of that ethnicity? Which makes it acceptable? But, as you say, a person can convert to Judaism, because it's not a religion? Yet the Israeli govt extends citizenship to all Jews, regardless of their apparent ethnicity?

Fantastic bit of circular reasoning. "Jewish" apparently means whatever conveniences the Israeli govt at the time... or your own efforts at propaganda. Clearly, it means something, and that something is the basis for the existence of the Jewish State and their apartheid-like policies of expropriation towards the people who live (or formerly lived) in the territory Israel has taken by force.

There's no point in trying to tell you the truth- you already know it, and do your best to obfuscate it.

Maybe if the Palestinians converted to Judaism they'd be granted the same rights as other Jews by the Israeli govt... probably not, huh?
 

SamurAchzar

Platinum Member
Feb 15, 2006
2,422
3
76
So, uhh, Judaism isn't a religion, but rather an ethnicity? Which makes Israeli policy not one that discriminates on the basis of religion, but on the basis of that ethnicity? Which makes it acceptable? But, as you say, a person can convert to Judaism, because it's not a religion? Yet the Israeli govt extends citizenship to all Jews, regardless of their apparent ethnicity?

It's very easy to judge and dismiss as racist or discriminatory, but don't forget that Jews were persecuted on the basis of their bloodlines, which made them react like that. They were all pretty content with the life around the globe, but rising antisemitism forced to find a national home - ironically, one that harbors them based on the same criteria they were persecuted because.

The entire idea behind Israel was a place where Jews can finally control their own destiny, and that means to have a majority, unless it degenerates to an apartheid state.
The Jewish majority is what allows granting equal rights to minorities (and Israel has one of the largest Muslim minority groups around the world, 20%), without losing control of their fate.

In terms of separation between church and state, Israel is generally no different than other countries in the sense that formally, the two are separate, but in practice religious groups put pressure on some issues. It's the same in the USA, if you look at gay marriage and abortions for example.

If you accept the idea the Jews are entitled to their own country, you need to understand why they must have the majority in it. If you reject it, well, that's another discussion altogether.

Maybe if the Palestinians converted to Judaism they'd be granted the same rights as other Jews by the Israeli govt... probably not, huh?

I don't know where you're getting with that, but consider the fact that Israel is on of the most ethnically diverse countries in the world. Israel brought in Jews from Arab countries (ones that looked and behaved like Arabs, mind), from Europe, from Africa (Ethiopians), so its perhaps the least discriminatory in terms of physical features (skin color, etc).

The Palestinians issue must be solved, but NOT by mixing the populations.
 

Moonbeam

Elite Member
Nov 24, 1999
72,430
6,088
126
It's very easy to judge and dismiss as racist or discriminatory, but don't forget that Jews were persecuted on the basis of their bloodlines, which made them react like that. They were all pretty content with the life around the globe, but rising antisemitism forced to find a national home - ironically, one that harbors them based on the same criteria they were persecuted because.

The entire idea behind Israel was a place where Jews can finally control their own destiny, and that means to have a majority, unless it degenerates to an apartheid state.
The Jewish majority is what allows granting equal rights to minorities (and Israel has one of the largest Muslim minority groups around the world, 20%), without losing control of their fate.

In terms of separation between church and state, Israel is generally no different than other countries in the sense that formally, the two are separate, but in practice religious groups put pressure on some issues. It's the same in the USA, if you look at gay marriage and abortions for example.

If you accept the idea the Jews are entitled to their own country, you need to understand why they must have the majority in it. If you reject it, well, that's another discussion altogether.



I don't know where you're getting with that, but consider the fact that Israel is on of the most ethnically diverse countries in the world. Israel brought in Jews from Arab countries (ones that looked and behaved like Arabs, mind), from Europe, from Africa (Ethiopians), so its perhaps the least discriminatory in terms of physical features (skin color, etc).

The Palestinians issue must be solved, but NOT by mixing the populations.

I don't know that you've ever noticed this or not, the facts being that folk close to an issue can't really think rationally about it at all, but it is precisely because an issue can't be be solved one way is what makes it an issue.
 

Jhhnn

IN MEMORIAM
Nov 11, 1999
62,365
14,681
136
You again argue in circles, SamurAchzar.

The "ethnic diversity" you attribute to Israel is a sham, because all the immigrants you reference, who carry some of the characteristics of the people where they lived and intermarried for centuries, are, by the definition of the Israeli govt, "Jewish". Otherwise, they wouldn't have been allowed to immigrate. That's nobody's definition of diversity other than Israelis'.

The "rising antisemitism" you reference came to an end with the Third Reich, prior to the formation of Israel. If anything, sympathy for Jews was extremely high in the aftermath, and remains so in much of the world. Witness the knee-jerk reactions of support from many Americans, regardless of Israeli actions. As a nation, America has assumed a mantle of guilt wrt the Holocaust, even though we were not the perpetrators. If anything, the Holocaust served the purposes of Zionists in a way that nothing else possibly could have done- it provided justification for the idea of a "Jewish State". The truth is that Zionists had been planning and working towards that long before the holocaust, and had basically planned for the removal of non-Jews from their long sought "Jewish State" to be formed from the then British mandate of Palestine. Ben-Gurion and others admitted as much, many times. When the opportunity arose, they did just that, insofar as they could while maintaining any sort of Image in the process. Which meant that the palestinians who had not fled in 1947 &1948 had to be allowed to remain, even though they're basically treated as second class citizens in many ways.

After the "pre-emptive" 1967 conquests, Israelis were presented with a very large palestinian population who didn't flee. But they wanted theirwater and agricultural resources, their land, and set out to take it in a very methodical and prolonged process of expropriation and separation, essentially apartheid in every way other than the name.

Although I'm generally not surprised at any sort of willful blindness by American Righties, their stance wrt Israelis and Palestinians is a truly prime example of it. They rant, rave, and raise hell in general when any part of our own govt exercises the right of eminent domain, compensates the parties for the takings, yet fully support the outright expropriation of palestinian resources which are taken w/o compensation of any sort... those takings are ongoing, deliberate, relentless, and have progressed to a point where the whole idea of a separate palestinian state is basically impossible. They don't have enough left to support themselves, even if Israel set out to make that possible.

It's greed, plain and simple, exercised in a very callous and calculated fashion, covered by excellent propaganda and a guilt trip wrt to the holocaust.

If you can't tell, I don't support the whole idea of a "Jewish State", a "Muslim State", "White America" or "Black Separatism" in any way, shape, or form. They're all based on concepts that run counter to true democracy and tolerance, on the whole "Us vs Them" dehumanizing headset that allows things like the holocaust to keep happening.

Which is not to say that I support some of the extreme attitudes and actions of those who oppose Israel, either. I will offer, however, that Israel brings much of that onto themselves, quite knowingly, because they can then use it as justification for further takings in the name of "Security". They parley with the Palestinians only when America demands it, offer only enough to look good rather than to arrive at any sort of lasting solution, keep doing what they've been doing all along... they're very much in control of the situation, and they know it.
 

Noobtastic

Banned
Jul 9, 2005
3,721
0
0
Jhhnn I am sick and tired of your fucking Arab propaganda bullshit, and am really pissed you failed to respond to 3 of my posts. I took the time to respond, only fair you respond in a similar manner.

However, I will fucking own you again simply cause I'm bored and know more than you.

Jhhnn;29353379]You again argue in circles, SamurAchzar.

The "ethnic diversity" you attribute to Israel is a sham, because all the immigrants you reference, who carry some of the characteristics of the people where they lived and intermarried for centuries, are, by the definition of the Israeli govt, "Jewish". Otherwise, they wouldn't have been allowed to immigrate. That's nobody's definition of diversity other than Israelis'.
Israel is one of the most ethnically and religiously diverse country on the planet. It has one of the largest Muslim minorities in the developed world - 15%. Druze and Christian make up 4% of the population, and Jews are 75%. But of the 75% of Jews, more than half are secular.

In fact, proportional to population Israel is more secular than the United States.
The "rising antisemitism" you reference came to an end with the Third Reich, prior to the formation of Israel. If anything, sympathy for Jews was extremely high in the aftermath, and remains so in much of the world.
More bullshit. Antisemitism never ended. Europe attempted over-come its 20 centuries of antisemitism after WWII. For some time, it worked - but by the 60s and 70s antisemitism returned and now Western Europe accounts for over 50% of all world-wide antisemitic acts. A sizable minority of Europeans - especially in Italy, France, and Ireland - have prejudiced against their Jewish population.

Europe's media is known to be extremely antisemitic and projects hatred of Israel unto its Jewish population. This has increased exponentially with the influx of Arab immigrants.




Witness the knee-jerk reactions of support from many Americans, regardless of Israeli actions
What knee jerk response? I see many users explaining their support for meticulously. Half the posters here posted less than a paragraph. You, however, cannot get passed it. Yes, you won't even recognize it, instead condemning it as knee-jerk activism.

Facts and figures, ahhh....too hard.


. As a nation, America has assumed a mantle of guilt wrt the Holocaust, even though we were not the perpetrators.
LOL! Since when? What a fuckin JOKE. America has protected leaders of the Arab world and have propped up Muslim dictators who romanticize Adolf Hitler.

If anything, the Holocaust served the purposes of Zionists in a way that nothing else possibly could have done- it provided justification for the idea of a "Jewish State".
You are a fucktard. Zionism predates the holocaust. It predates the USA. Hell, it predates Islamic and the Arab identity.

The holocaust created millions of Jewish immigrants who had no place to go. Antisemitism was still rampant in Western Europe, and Jews in the Arab world were being attacked. Jewish nationalism suddenly saw an increase, mostly as a reaction to hateful trolls like yourself.

The truth is that Zionists had been planning and working towards that long before the holocaust, and had basically planned for the removal of non-Jews from their long sought "Jewish State" to be formed from the then British mandate of Palestine.
PROOF? PLEASE PROOF THIS BULLSHIT. Have you read the Jewish state by Herzl? No, of course you haven't. He talks nothing about removing the Arab/Ottoman population of Palestine. And the book was written more than 20 years before the British conquered Palestine, DUMBASS.

Leaders of Etzel, including Jabotinsky, argued for a Zionist state where Arabs and Jews have equal rights. Many early Zionists considered mass-converting Jewish immigrants to Christianity to placate Arab prejudice.

But guess what? In Israel - ARABS AND JEWS HAVE EQUAL RIGHTS!

Now, would you like to know what happened to the Jewish population of the arab world - whose presence predates arab civilization?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jewish_exodus_from_Arab_lands




Ben-Gurion and others admitted as much, many times. When the opportunity arose, they did just that, insofar as they could while maintaining any sort of Image in the process. Which meant that the palestinians who had not fled in 1947 &1948 had to be allowed to remain, even though they're basically treated as second class citizens in many ways.
Proof.

Proof proof proof. Arabs that did not flee during the war - a war started by the Arabs and this is not a dispute - became citizens of Israel.

Period.

Over 200,000 Arabs left voluntarily before the war began, mostly the wealthy arabs, under the impression that the Arabs would conquer Israel.

Israel knew a war was coming well before the Arab's invaded.
After the "pre-emptive" 1967 conquests, Israelis were presented with a very large palestinian population who didn't flee. But they wanted theirwater and agricultural resources, their land, and set out to take it in a very methodical and prolonged process of expropriation and separation, essentially apartheid in every way other than the name.
PROOF?

As stated by many members, Israel has returned 94% of all land captured during the Six Day War for peace with Egypt, Jordan, and the PLO.

Israel was prepared to give up land when they agreed to UN242, which called for a negotiated peace. This was soundly rejected by the Arab's who demanded Israel give back all the land for nothing, or else they would continue their pointless aggression.

Israeli settlements did not begin until 1970s, designed as a buffer zone and send a message to the Arab world that aggressors get occupied. Even then Jewish presence in the West Bank was less than 50,000 well into the 1980s, and overwhelmingly sat on under-developed land.

As far as water is concerned, Arabs of the West Bank only had access to 10% of the water allocated by Jordan. When Israel showed up, Arabs gained 20%.

here are some stats contrasting the standard of living of Arab residents in the West Bank before and after Israeli management:

Some facts about the Israeli occupation of Palestine:"
------------------------------------------
Here are facts, of which Arabs or their sympathizers DO NOT want you to know:

DURING 20 YEARS (1947 - 1967) OF ARAB RULE :
* Palestinian Male life expectancy grew from 42 to 44.
* Palestinian Female life expectancy grew from 45 to 46
* Palestinian Infant mortality rate decreased from 200 per thousand to 170 per thousand.
* Cruse death rate decreased from 21 per thousand to 19 per thousand.
* Before 1967, only 113 hospitals had been built in the territories
* Before 1967 only 23 Mother & Child Centers had been established.
* Before 1967 the percentage of illiterates on average had been 27.8% among men and among women even higher at 65.1%.

DURING THE NEXT 22 YEARS (1967 - 1989) OF ISRAELI RULE :
* Palestinian Male life expectancy grew from 44 to 63.
* Palestinian Female life expectancy grew from 46 to 67.
* Palestinian Infant mortality rate decreased from 170 per thousand to 60 per thousand.
* Infant mortality rate decreased from 19 per thousand to 6 per thousand.
* Malaria, which had existed in the territories before 1967 was finally eliminated during the Israeli occupation.

Israel also more than tripled the number of Palestinian teachers and boosted the Palestinian educational system by establishing a number of universities. Among them:
College of Scientists (Abu Dis) - est. 1982. (Yeh, that famous Abu-Dis).
College of Social Welfare (El Bira) - est. 1979.
College of Religion (Beit Hanina) - est. 1978
Islamic College in Hebron- est.1971.

Fact: Jordan banned Arabs in the West Bank from building universities.

By 1983 Israel had helped reduce illiteracy to only 13.5% among men and 38.9% among women.

In 2010, Palestinians have an average life expectancy of 75 - higher than Egypt, Syria, Pakistan, Yemen, India and Indonesia.

Literacy is 91%, 3rd highest in the Middle East - behind Jordan and Israel.

Standard of living has increased exponentially since Arabs gained access into Israel. Over 40,000 Palestinians work in the settlements, and before the intifada 1 in 4 Palestinian families had a member working in Israel.

the West Bank also has one of the fastest growing economies in the Middle East, mostly because of Israel.


Although I'm generally not surprised at any sort of willful blindness by American Righties, their stance wrt Israelis and Palestinians is a truly prime example of it. They rant, rave, and raise hell in general when any part of our own govt exercises the right of eminent domain, compensates the parties for the takings, yet fully support the outright expropriation of palestinian resources which are taken w/o compensation of any sort... those takings are ongoing, deliberate, relentless, and have progressed to a point where the whole idea of a separate palestinian state is basically impossible. They don't have enough left to support themselves, even if Israel set out to make that possible.
The only one ranting and raving is you. I've provided specific facts and numbers that completely demolish your victimhood. Palestinians are one of the most prized people on the planet. Their leadership is richer than any American politician. They are world record holders in humanitarian aid.

And they are the god-fathers of modern terrorism.

You have been owned, sir.

qanaproductionsresized.jpg


pallywood.jpg


manpointing.jpg
 

Jhhnn

IN MEMORIAM
Nov 11, 1999
62,365
14,681
136
I must be getting entirely too close to the truth for you to bear, SamurAchzar- you're raving, using really big fonts, dragging out the usual unsourced statistics as "facts" in support of your position- all canned, prepared ahead of time, cut and pasted from wherever you derive your inspiration and guidance. Basically, you've run out of tricks, and now rely on the principle that he who yells loudest wins.

I particularly like the stipulation that it was the arabs who started the conflict in 1947&1948- not the Stern Gang, the Haganah, the Irgun, the other well armed and organized jewish militias who systematically terrorized the palestinians... well in advance of any statements by neighboring arab govts about invasion.

The establishment of a jewish majority in what became Israel was achieved at gunpoint, with the expulsion of many of the former residents via a campaign of terror. They fled for their lives. Very simple, really, despite your protestations to the contrary. And you act as if the Israelis did the palestinians a favor after the 1967 invasion, taking their property and denying them a political voice, portray them as the international equivalent of welfare queens in the process. That's a new twist, anyway...

Victimhood? The state of Israel is based on the concept, that the only way jews can avoid it is to inflict it on others. You admit the first, deny the second, when they're just opposite faces of the same coin.

Personally, I don't have a dog in the fight, other than the fact that I see the Israeli tail wagging the American dog a lot more than is really healthy for America. Left to your own devices, you'll obviously destroy yourselves, and I just don't want us to be dragged down in the process.
 

Noobtastic

Banned
Jul 9, 2005
3,721
0
0
I must be getting entirely too close to the truth for you to bear, SamurAchzar- you're raving, using really big fonts, dragging out the usual unsourced statistics as "facts" in support of your position- all canned, prepared ahead of time, cut and pasted from wherever you derive your inspiration and guidance. Basically, you've run out of tricks, and now rely on the principle that he who yells loudest wins.

Can you not respond to my post? Please, feel free to debate?
I particularly like the stipulation that it was the arabs who started the conflict in 1947&1948- not the Stern Gang, the Haganah, the Irgun, the other well armed and organized jewish militias who systematically terrorized the palestinians... well in advance of any statements by neighboring arab govts about invasion.

For starters, the Haganah, Irgun, and Stern Gang were 3 entirely separate an independent organizations. The Haganah was a decedent of the modern Israeli Defense Forces. It began after the Arab revolts - when the Arab population started harassing and assaulting the Jewish population.

Over 5,000 Arabs were killed in the ensuing conflict, mostly by the British.

Jews were a minority. They had no beef with the Arabs. Hebron massacre occurred well before any self-defense forces began. Etzel was hunted by the Haganah.

And btw, Arabs were not called Palestinians before 1967. No British, Arab, or Jew knew of a specific ethnic identity known as "Palestinian." In fact, Palestinian was a term used to refer to anyone living in the vicinity of Palestine irrelevant of religion. But most Arabs considered themselves Syrians first, Ottoman second, subjects of the British 3rd, and maybe "Palestinian" which didn't even begin until the late 19th century.

you are a fucking idiot and I hope you go move to the arab states. the states you are loyal to.