• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Major League Baseball owner dislikes rape victims

jaeger66

Banned
Stories like these make me suicidal becasue I can't bear the thought of sharing the planet with people so crazy. If Colangelo's daughter got raped and potentially fatally pregnant, is he going to say "Sorry honey, but you have to die so we can get this kid born"?
 
So, "baseball hate rape victims" because 90 people associated with the sport don't believe in abortion?

In that case, Alabama hates black people.
 
Originally posted by: jaeger66
Stories like these make me suicidal becasue I can't bear the thought of sharing the planet with people so crazy. If Colangelo's daughter got raped and potentially fatally pregnant, is he going to say "Sorry honey, but you have to die so we can get this kid born"?

The man has a different view from yourself on the abortion issue, and you call him crazy.
Since you are the one suicidal over this, maybe you are crazy?
I don't have an opinion on the abortion issue. But I do understand why some people who consider it murder would be against it under any circumstances.
They aren't bad people, just have a different opinion.
 
Originally posted by: SuperTool
Originally posted by: jaeger66
Stories like these make me suicidal becasue I can't bear the thought of sharing the planet with people so crazy. If Colangelo's daughter got raped and potentially fatally pregnant, is he going to say "Sorry honey, but you have to die so we can get this kid born"?

The man has a different view from yourself on the abortion issue, and you call him crazy.
Since you are the one suicidal over this, maybe you are crazy?
I don't have an opinion on the abortion issue. But I do understand why some people who consider it murder would be against it under any circumstances.
They aren't bad people, just have a different opinion.

bingo.
 
The core of the issue is if you believe abortion is murder. These people obviously believe it is murder no matter what, and see no way of justifing the murder of an unborn child. It doesn't make them stupid. It doesn't mean they hate rape victims. It simply means that they will not condone murder under any circumstances.

That being said, opinions are like... well, you know the rest.

Ryan
 
Originally posted by: SuperTool

The man has a different view from yourself on the abortion issue, and you call him crazy.
Since you are the one suicidal over this, maybe you are crazy?

Maybe you should go back to stealing electricity.
 
Originally posted by: rgwalt
The core of the issue is if you believe abortion is murder. These people obviously believe it is murder no matter what, and see no way of justifing the murder of an unborn child. It doesn't make them stupid. It doesn't mean they hate rape victims. It simply means that they will not condone murder under any circumstances.

That being said, opinions are like... well, you know the rest.

Ryan

I'm sorry, but people who put their own sense of self satisfaction above a woman whose life has already been destroyed are not good or moral. They are evil.
 
Originally posted by: jaeger66
Originally posted by: SuperTool

The man has a different view from yourself on the abortion issue, and you call him crazy.
Since you are the one suicidal over this, maybe you are crazy?

Maybe you should go back to stealing electricity.

Maybe you should stop stealing my air. Weren't you feeling suicidal there for a second?
 
Originally posted by: jaeger66
Originally posted by: rgwalt
The core of the issue is if you believe abortion is murder. These people obviously believe it is murder no matter what, and see no way of justifing the murder of an unborn child. It doesn't make them stupid. It doesn't mean they hate rape victims. It simply means that they will not condone murder under any circumstances.

That being said, opinions are like... well, you know the rest.

Ryan

I'm sorry, but people who put their own sense of self satisfaction above a woman whose life has already been destroyed are not good or moral. They are evil.

what makes the woman any more important than the child?? you said it yourself her life has already been destroyed. you aren't even giving the child a chance to live a full life.

*not that i would back letting a woman die so that a baby would be born, just playing devil's advocate*
 
Originally posted by: jaeger66
Originally posted by: rgwalt
The core of the issue is if you believe abortion is murder. These people obviously believe it is murder no matter what, and see no way of justifing the murder of an unborn child. It doesn't make them stupid. It doesn't mean they hate rape victims. It simply means that they will not condone murder under any circumstances.

That being said, opinions are like... well, you know the rest.

Ryan

I'm sorry, but people who put their own sense of self satisfaction above a woman whose life has already been destroyed are not good or moral. They are evil.

No, you are wrong here. It has nothing to do with a sense of self satisfaction. I'm curious as to what leads you to that sort of opinion. The fact is that this group of people believes that aborting and unborn child is murder. They will not condone these murders for any reason. Now, whether their opinion is right or wrong is another question. However, their opinion does not make them "evil".

Here is a thought experiment for you jaeger... If a woman is murdered while carrying a child, or someone intentionally does something to a woman to cause her child to be aborted, then they can be (and typically are) charged with the murder of the unborn child. Fundamentally what sets that senario apart from a woman going in to have her pregnancy terminated? In both instances an unborn child is removed from the mother and "dies". I haven't heard any compelling arguments as to why one situation is different from the other.

Now, this all being said, you may make some assumptions as to my opinion on abortion. Don't, as you will likely be completely wrong. What I'm trying to point out is that you are making some significant assumptions about these people that support the anti-abortion crusade without trying to understand their point of view.

Ryan
 
Originally posted by: Spoooon
They can do what they want, I don't see abortion being outlawed anytime soon.

All we need is for one of the liberal supreme court justices to retire, and Bush will (100% certain) appoint a pro-life judge. That will tip the scale 5-4 in favor of abortion to 5-4 in opposition. It will effectively outlaw abortion. I guarantee if one of the liberal justices retires, that will happen with Bush in office.
 
Originally posted by: HendrixFan
Originally posted by: Spoooon
They can do what they want, I don't see abortion being outlawed anytime soon.

All we need is for one of the liberal supreme court justices to retire, and Bush will (100% certain) appoint a pro-life judge. That will tip the scale 5-4 in favor of abortion to 5-4 in opposition. It will effectively outlaw abortion. I guarantee if one of the liberal justices retires, that will happen with Bush in office.

I don't know. I think that Barbara and Laura Bush will make a good case against it being outlawed altogehter.
 
*sigh*Another Abortion Thread. The two sides to this story are as opposite as it gets. The bottom line TODAY is this: abortion is safe and legal in the USA...despite the best efforts of the pro-lifers to make it illegal, unsafe and relegated to the alleys of yesteryear.
 
Originally posted by: HendrixFan


All we need is for one of the liberal supreme court justices to retire, and Bush will (100% certain) appoint a pro-life judge. That will tip the scale 5-4 in favor of abortion to 5-4 in opposition. It will effectively outlaw abortion. I guarantee if one of the liberal justices retires, that will happen with Bush in office.

Reagan appointed 2 justices who voted pro-choice. You never know. Plus, his frontrunner if Rehnquist retires has views on abortion that are wishy washy at best.
 
Originally posted by: rgwalt


Here is a thought experiment for you jaeger... If a woman is murdered while carrying a child, or someone intentionally does something to a woman to cause her child to be aborted, then they can be (and typically are) charged with the murder of the unborn child. Fundamentally what sets that senario apart from a woman going in to have her pregnancy terminated? In both instances an unborn child is removed from the mother and "dies". I haven't heard any compelling arguments as to why one situation is different from the other.

Ryan

The "opinion" argument only goes so far. I can't murder somebody becasue it's my opinion that they needed to die. But the law in this country says a woman has the right to decide, which is different than if the termination comes through being shot or otherwise assaulted. Giving money to a foundation that wishes to remove a person's right to save her life is...I'm sorry but it's just evil.

 
Originally posted by: MichaelD
*sigh*Another Abortion Thread. The two sides to this story are as opposite as it gets. The bottom line TODAY is this: abortion is safe and legal in the USA...despite the best efforts of the pro-lifers to make it illegal, unsafe and relegated to the alleys of yesteryear.

I'm sorry. I never read the abortion threads because they just end it stupid flame wars and nobody will ever change anyone else's mind, but this is too much.
 
Originally posted by: jaeger66
Originally posted by: MichaelD
*sigh*Another Abortion Thread. The two sides to this story are as opposite as it gets. The bottom line TODAY is this: abortion is safe and legal in the USA...despite the best efforts of the pro-lifers to make it illegal, unsafe and relegated to the alleys of yesteryear.

I'm sorry. I never read the abortion threads because they just end it stupid flame wars and nobody will ever change anyone else's mind, but this is too much.

I agree that abortion threads tend to be a waste of all our time. But I believe what he was getting at, is the fact that abortions have been taking place for a loooong time, and even when they are not on the up and up, they still happen. People will leave the country, find some doctor their or here that is not regulated and get it done. I am sure, as the modern form is not its only form, that their are herbs and other physical means to abort a fetus. When its illegal, there is a higher chance that we not just lose the babies, but we also lose our daughters who carry them.

Night
 
Originally posted by: Turin39789

I agree that abortion threads tend to be a waste of all our time. But I believe what he was getting at, is the fact that abortions have been taking place for a loooong time, and even when they are not on the up and up, they still happen. People will leave the country, find some doctor their or here that is not regulated and get it done. I am sure, as the modern form is not its only form, that their are herbs and other physical means to abort a fetus. When its illegal, there is a higher chance that we not just lose the babies, but we also lose our daughters who carry them.

Night

What gets me here is just the hypocrisy, because you can't tell me that if abortion was outlawed that the rich politicians who made it happen wouldn't fly their daughters off to Sweden to get one post-haste should it become necessary. Like you said, those less fortunate will resort to coat hangers and vacuum cleaners. The problem is only compounded by these same politicians who want sex ed and contraception removed from school curriculum.
 
Originally posted by: jaeger66
Originally posted by: SuperTool


Maybe you should stop stealing my air. Weren't you feeling suicidal there for a second?

I don't need moralizing from a 2-bit thief like you.


There is already a thread open on the matter. Maybe you should do search, and post it in there thread I would gladly debate you there.
You are trying to change the subjects and bring in bits and pieces of other threads because this debate is not exactly going your way. Trying to change the subject and argue two things at once maybe a bit too much for you, since you couldn't even develope a convincing argument for your original post.
That said, I don't need to steal anything. Why would I need to steal electricity if my local energy company was giving it to me for 4 bucks a month of their own free will and negligence? LOL 🙂 It would be like stealing a car when a dealer is giving you a brand new one for 300 bucks.
I don't go around moralizing on these abortion subjects because I don't care about them. I am an atheist, and a registered democrat. Frankly I am undecided on the abortion issue. Mostly because it's not very relevant to me, so I didn't give it much thought. At the same time, claiming that someone who is against abortion is crazy or dislikes rape victims, and even feeling suicidal over the whole thing, is very misguided, and I was just pointing it out to you.
 
All we need is for one of the liberal supreme court justices to retire, and Bush will (100% certain) appoint a pro-life judge. That will tip the scale 5-4 in favor of abortion to 5-4 in opposition. It will effectively outlaw abortion. I guarantee if one of the liberal justices retires, that will happen with Bush in office.
Sorry, you are misinformed, it is currently 6-3 for abortion rights. Bush would have to replace two justices in order to fundamentally jeapordize Roe v. Wade.

5-4 is the current weight of the court on ABSOLUTE UNRESTRICTED access to abortion on demand, including minors.

 
Originally posted by: jaeger66
Originally posted by: rgwalt


Here is a thought experiment for you jaeger... If a woman is murdered while carrying a child, or someone intentionally does something to a woman to cause her child to be aborted, then they can be (and typically are) charged with the murder of the unborn child. Fundamentally what sets that senario apart from a woman going in to have her pregnancy terminated? In both instances an unborn child is removed from the mother and "dies". I haven't heard any compelling arguments as to why one situation is different from the other.

Ryan

The "opinion" argument only goes so far. I can't murder somebody becasue it's my opinion that they needed to die. But the law in this country says a woman has the right to decide, which is different than if the termination comes through being shot or otherwise assaulted. Giving money to a foundation that wishes to remove a person's right to save her life is...I'm sorry but it's just evil.

The thought experiement was designed to help you realize that it is reasonable to believe that ending an unborn child's life is murder. This group of people feel that murdering an unborn child is unacceptable no matter the situation. Thus, they are forming an organization to try and stop the murder of an unborn child. What they are doing is perfectly reasonable, and it isn't evil. Whether they are right or wrong is another question that we don't need to try and answer. I'm trying to help you see things from their perspective instead of simply saying "They are evil.", but I think you may be too fired up. *sigh*

Ryan
 
Back
Top