Because Verizon has more control over it's users on Android than they do on the iPhone.If Verizon already bought the iPhones, why do their salesman push Android?
Because Verizon has more control over it's users on Android than they do on the iPhone.If Verizon already bought the iPhones, why do their salesman push Android?
If Verizon is so pro Android why did they drop $23B on the iPhone? Seems like a stupid move for them if they weren't planning to put any effort into selling iPhones.
Nice tittle OP.
All the Android fan boys, come let yourselves be know!
Salemen work on commission, Android phones offer better commissions.
There wasn't any bickering or fanboy-ism until you posted.
If Verizon is so pro Android why did they drop $23B on the iPhone? Seems like a stupid move for them if they weren't planning to put any effort into selling iPhones.
There should be a semicolon in the title so it's less misleading. By having a comma, you imply that Apple was found guilty of price fixing the iPhone.
Im guessing they figured they would sell themselves. However, Android wasn't what it was a few years ago. Mainstream people actually go for the Galaxy phones now and I see a relatively even number between those and iPhones. Add in the Note for people who like huge ass phones.
Cuz the OP has a history of just trolling about Apple? If you notice his posts he'll laugh at every fall Apple takes. It's one thing to have a negative opinion of Apple but another to try so hard in every thread to slam Apple.Yeah, it's honestly two separate threads. Not sure why OP decided to make one thread about two different things.
Depends on where you are, of course. People with the money often buy iPhones, I think.
Cuz the OP has a history of just trolling about Apple? If you notice his posts he'll laugh at every fall Apple takes. It's one thing to have a negative opinion of Apple but another to try so hard in every thread to slam Apple.
lol, iphone is for dum fokes, android is fa po' fokes...
Pretty ironic coming from you. Considering the amount of slamming you do on Android.
If you can't tell the difference between people like jpeyton and phokus vs. dlerium then you are already a lost cause.
Depends on where you are, of course. People with the money often buy iPhones, I think.
Since flagship phones all pretty much cost the same $199 (plus or minus $50) on contract that's patently false. Outside of hot deals and promotions the typical retail paying consumer is looking at the same price tag on an iPhone 5 as a Galaxy S4 as the HTC One. Even the Lumia 920 was priced like a flagship phone when it came out.
Apple is no Vertu. And Vertu's product *is* a phone that only people with tons of money can buy ($10k for a handset before you get into accessories). It's also Android based.
Pretty ironic coming from you. Considering the amount of slamming you do on Android.
I was on Android. I spent something like $5 on a single app - and that was a backup app. On iOS, everything costs something. The costs of the phones are more than just the handset.
And while we're looking at handsets, an S3 with 32GB of memory on board cost $50 more than the 16GB model, and had an SD card slot to let you add more at proper cost. Apple charges an extra $100 I think for each new tier of storage. On top of that, let's not forget iPhones have proprietary plugs and all that. They just cost more.
I was on Android. I spent something like $5 on a single app - and that was a backup app. On iOS, everything costs something. The costs of the phones are more than just the handset.
And while we're looking at handsets, an S3 with 32GB of memory on board cost $50 more than the 16GB model, and had an SD card slot to let you add more at proper cost. Apple charges an extra $100 I think for each new tier of storage. On top of that, let's not forget iPhones have proprietary plugs and all that. They just cost more.